Skip to main content
Log in

Objective Bayesian model selection approach to the two way analysis of variance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An objective Bayesian procedure for testing in the two way analysis of variance is proposed. In the classical methodology the main effects of the two factors and the interaction effect are formulated as linear contrasts between means of normal populations, and hypotheses of the existence of such effects are tested. In this paper, for the first time these hypotheses have been formulated as objective Bayesian model selection problems. Our development is under homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity, providing exact solutions in both cases. Bayes factors are the key tool to choose between the models under comparison but for the usual default prior distributions they are not well defined. To avoid this difficulty Bayes factors for intrinsic priors are proposed and they are applied in this setting to test the existence of the main effects and the interaction effect. The method has been illustrated with an example and compared with the classical method. For this example, both approaches went in the same direction although the large P value for interaction (0.79) only prevents us against to reject the null, and the posterior probability of the null (0.95) was conclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger JO, Pericchi LR (1996) The intrinsic Bayes factor for model selection and prediction. J Am Stat Assoc 91:109–122

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO, Pericchi LR (2015) Bayes factors. Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolino F, Moreno E, Racugno W (2000) Bayesian model selection approach to analysis of variance under heteroscedasticity. Statistician 49(4):503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano JA, Kessler M, Moreno E (2004) On intrinsic priors for nonnested models. Test 13:445–463

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cano JA, Carazo C, Salmerón D (2013) Bayesian model selection approach to the one way analysis of variance under homoscedasticity. Comput Stat 28:919–931

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cano JA, Carazo C, Salmerón D (2016) Objective Bayesian model selection approach to linear contrasts for the one way analysis of variance. Stat Prob Lett 109:54–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Casella G (2001) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rohatgi VK (1984) Statistical inference. Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Iowa City

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Séneca Foundation Programme for the Generation of Excellence Scientific Knowledge under Project 15220/PI/10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Cano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cano, J.A., Carazo, C. & Salmerón, D. Objective Bayesian model selection approach to the two way analysis of variance. Comput Stat 33, 235–248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1

Keywords

Navigation