Skip to main content
Log in

Choice of optimal second stage designs in two-stage experiments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In real-life projects, in order to obtain precious information about the process, we often partition the experiment into two stages with equal size. The main purpose of this article is to study how to choose the first stage experimental designs (FSED) and the second stage experimental designs (SSED) to construct uniform or at least good approximation to uniform (GATU) two-stage experimental designs (TSED) that involve a mixture of \(\omega _1\ge 1\) factors with \(\mu _1\ge 2\) levels and \(\omega _2\ge 1\) factors with \(\mu _2\ge 2\) levels whether regular or nonregular. Through theoretical justification, this paper proves that the SSED is uniform (GATU) if and only if the FSED is uniform (GATU), the TSED is uniform (GATU) if and only if its corresponding complementary TSED is uniform (GATU), and the TSED is uniform or at least GATU if and only if the FSED is uniform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althöfer I, Koschnick K-V (1991) On the convergence of “Threshold Accepting”. Appl Math Optim 24:183–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JR, Buck R, Riccomagno E, Wynn HP (1996) Experimental design and observation for large eystems. J R Stat Soc B 57:77–94

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experiments. Wiley, NewYork

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bullington KE, Hool JN, Maghsoodloo S (1990) A simple method for obtaining resolution IV designs for use with Taguchis orthogonal arrays. J Qual Technol 22(4):260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong KTW, Htay K, Tan RHC, Lim M (2012) Identifying combinatorial growth inhibitory effects of various plant extracts on leukemia cells through systematic experimental design. Am J Plant Sci 3:1390–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM (2016) Constructing optimal asymmetric combined designs via Lee discrepancy. Stat Probab Lett 118:24–31

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM (2017a) A closer look at de-aliasing effects using an efficient foldover technique. Statistics 51(3):532–557

  • Elsawah AM (2017b) A powerful and efficient algorithm for breaking the links between aliased effects in asymmetric designs. Aust N Z J Stat 59(1):17–41

  • Elsawah AM (2017c) Constructing optimal router bit life sequential experimental designs: new results with a case study. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1397164

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2016) An efficient methodology for constructing optimal foldover designs in terms of mixture discrepancy. J Korean Stat Soc 45:77–88

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2017a) A new look on optimal foldover plans in terms of uniformity criteria. Commun Stat Theory Methods 46(4):1621–1635

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2017b) Optimum mechanism for breaking the confounding effects of mixed-level designs. Comput Stat 32(2):781–802

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT (1980) The uniform design: application of number-theoretic methods in experimental design. Acta Math Appl Sin 3:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Lin DKJ, Qin H (2003) A note on optimal foldover design. Stat Probab Lett 62:245–250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Tang Y, Yin J (2005) Lower bounds for the wrap-around \(L_2\)- discrepancy of symmetrical uniform designs. J Complex 21:757–771

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Ke X, Elsawah AM (2017) Construction of uniform designs via an adjusted threshold accepting algorithm. J Complex 43:28–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hickernell FJ (1998) A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Math Comput 67:299–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Lin DKJ (2003) Optimal foldover plans for two-level fractional factorial designs. Technometrics 45:142–149

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Lin DKJ, Ye KQ (2003) Optimal foldover plans for non-regular orthogonal designs. Technometrics 45:347–351

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li PF, Liu MQ, Zhang RC (2005) Choice of optimal initial designs in sequential experiments. Metrika 61(2):127–135

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1996) Foldover of \(2^{k-p}\) resolution IV experimental designs. Qual Technol 28:446–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou Z, Qin H (2017) Optimal foldover plans of asymmetric factorials with minimum wrap-around \(L_2\)-discrepancy. Pap Stat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-017-0892-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fang KT (1981) A note on uniform distribution and experimental design. Chin Sci Bull 26:485–489

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Robert GM, John FB (2010) A note on the selection of optimal foldover plans for 16- and 32-run fractional factorial designs. J Stat Plan Inference 140:1497–1500

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YD, Ning JH (2008) Lower bounds of the wrap-around \(L_2\)-discrepancy and relationships between MLHD and uniform design with a large size. J Stat Plan Inference 138:2330–2339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YD, Ning JH, Song XB (2008) Lee discrepancy and its applications in experimental designs. Stat Probab Lett 78:1933–1942

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author greatly appreciate helpful suggestions of the two referees that significantly improved the paper. The author also thank Prof. Kai-Tai Fang for his guidance and support. This work was partially supported by the UIC Grants (Nos. R201409 and R201712) and the Zhuhai Premier Discipline Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Elsawah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsawah, A.M. Choice of optimal second stage designs in two-stage experiments. Comput Stat 33, 933–965 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0778-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0778-3

Keywords

Navigation