Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Expansion of the Probability Mass Function that may be used to Improve Poisson Approximations

  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Random variables defined on the natural numbers may often be approximated by Poisson variables. Just as normal approximations may be improved by the Edgeworth expansion, Poisson approximations may be substantially improved by a similar expansion. Both of these expansions require one to approximate a generating function. This paper will derive a separate expansion for improving Poisson approximations to tail probabilities by approximating the probability mass function directly. This new expansion is often useful for points in the tails of the distribution. Examples will be presented to illustrate the usefulness and accuracy of this new expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbour, A., Holst, L., and Janson, S. (1992). Poisson Approximation. Oxford University Press. New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbour, A. and Jensen, J. (1989). Local and tail approximations near the Poisson limit. Scand. J. Statist. 16. 75–87.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barndorff-Nielson, O.E., and Cox, D.R. (1979). Edgeworth and saddle-point approximations with statistical applications. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 41. 279–312.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedrick, E., and Hill, J. (1992). An empirical assessment of saddlepoint approximations for testing a logistic regression parameter. Biometrics. 48. 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniels, H.E. (1987). Tail probability approximations. International Statistical Review. 55. 37–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas, J.B. (1980). Analysis with Standard Contagious Distributions. International Co-operative Publishing House. Maryland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gray, H.L. and Wang, S. (1989). An extension of the Levin-Sidi class of nonlinear transformations for accelerating convergence of infinite integrals and series. Appl. Math. Comput. 33. 75–87.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray, H.L. and Wang, S. (1991). A general method for approximating tail probabilities. JASA. 86. 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, P. (1992). The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer-Verlag. New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Kathman, S. (1999). Discrete Small Sample Asymptotics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Tech.

  11. Levin, D. and Sidi, A. (1981). Two new classes of nonlinear transformations for accelerating the convergence of infinite integrals and series. Appl. Math. Comput. 9. 175–215.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Terrell, G. (2000). Density-based tail area approximation. Unpublished Manuscript.

  13. Weisstein, E. (1999). CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. Chapman and Hall. New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, USA

    Steven J. Kathman

Authors
  1. Steven J. Kathman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kathman, S.J. An Expansion of the Probability Mass Function that may be used to Improve Poisson Approximations. Computational Statistics 17, 123–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001800200095

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001800200095

Keywords

MSC

Search

Navigation