Skip to main content
Log in

On sequential and simultaneous contributions under incomplete information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When contributors to a common cause (or public good) are uncertain about each others’ valuations, early contributors are likely to be cautious in free-riding on future contributors. Contrary to the case of complete information, when contributors have independent private valuations for the public good, the expected total contribution generated in a sequential move game may be higher than in a simultaneous move game. This is established in a conventional framework with quasi-linear utility where agents care only about the total provision of the public good (rather than individual contribution levels) and there is no non-convexity in the provision of the public good. We allow for arbitrary number of agents and fairly general distribution of types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admati A, Perry M (1991) Joint projects without commitment. Rev Econ Stud 58: 259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agastya M (2009) Transparency of peer activities confounds cheap talk in joint projects. University of Sydney (Economics) Working paper

  • Agastya M, Menezes F, Sengupta K (2007) Cheap talk, efficiency and egalitarian cost sharing in joint projects. Games Econ Behav 60: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni J (1998) Toward a theory of charitable fund-raising. J Polit Econ 106: 1186–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni J (2006) Philanthropy. In: Kolm S-C, Mercier Ythier J (eds) Handbook of giving, reciprocity and altruism. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1201–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bag PK, Roy S (2008) Repeated charitable contributions under incomplete information. Econ J 118: 60–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessen J, Maskin E (2009) Sequential innovation, patents and imitation. Rand J Econ 40: 611–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss C, Nalebuff B (1984) Dragon-slaying and ballroom dancing. J Public Econ 25: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coats JC, Gronberg TJ, Grosskopf B (2009) Simultaneous versus sequential public good provision and the role of refunds—an experimental study. J Public Econ 93: 326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer J, Riordan MH (1985) A sequential solution to the public goods problem. Econometrica 53: 77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman C, Nitzan S (1991) Dynamic voluntary provision of public goods. Eur Econ Rev 35: 1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer A, Konrad KC (1996) A signaling explanation for charity. Am Econ Rev 86: 1019–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein M (1992) Time dynamics and incomplete information in the private provision of public goods. J Polit Econ 100: 581–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh W (1998) What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J Public Econ 67: 269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MO, Moulin H (1992) Implementing a public project and distributing its cost. J Econ Theory 57: 125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List J, Lucking-Reiley D (2002) The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. J Polit Econ 110: 215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx LM, Matthews SA (2000) Dynamic voluntary contribution to a public project. Rev Econ Stud 67: 327–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes F, Monteiro PK, Temimi A (2001) Private provision of discrete public goods with incomplete information. J Math Econ 35: 493–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey TR, Rosenthal H (1988) Private incentives in social dilemmas: the effects of incomplete information and altruism. J Public Econ 35: 309–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potters J, Sefton M, Vesterlund L (2005) After you—endogenous sequencing in voluntary contribution games. J Public Econ 89: 1399–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano R, Yildirim H (2001) Why charities announce donations: a positive perspective. J Public Econ 81: 423–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman WK, Robertson SJ, Middlebrook JL, Drabman RS (1984) An investigation of pledging behaviour to a national charitable telethon. Behav Ther 15: 304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetevent AR (2005) Anonymity in giving in a natural context—a field experiment in thirty churches. J Public Econ 89: 2301–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1994) Sequential contributions to public goods. J Public Econ 53: 165–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Redondo F (1995) Public subscriptions and private contributions. Soc Choice Welfare 12: 193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterlund L (2003) The informational value of sequential fundraising. J Public Econ 87: 627–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter E (2006) Optimal incentives for sequential production processes. Rand J Econ 37: 376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parimal Kanti Bag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bag, P.K., Roy, S. On sequential and simultaneous contributions under incomplete information. Int J Game Theory 40, 119–145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0230-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0230-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation