Skip to main content
Log in

Axiomatizing core extensions

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We give an axiomatization of the aspiration core on the domain of all TU-games using a relaxed feasibility condition, non-emptiness, individual rationality, and generalized versions of the reduced game property (consistency) and superadditivity. Our axioms also characterize the C-core (Guesnerie and Oddou, Econ Lett 3(4):301–306, 1979; Sun et al. J Math Econ 44(7–8):853–860, 2008) and the core on appropriate subdomains. The main result of the paper generalizes Peleg’s (J Math Econ 14(2):203–214, 1985) core axiomatization to the entire family of TU-games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers W (1979) Core-and kernel-variants based on imputations and demand profiles. In: Moeschlin O, Pollaschke D (eds) Game theory and related fields. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (1985) An axiomatization of the non-transferable utility value. Econometrica 53: 599–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E (1981) The aspiration core, bargaining set, kernel and nucleolus. Technical report, working paper 488, School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo (revised 1983)

  • Bennett E (1983) The aspiration approach to predicting coalition formation and payoff distribution in sidepayment games. Int J Game Theory 12(1): 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondareva O (1963) Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. SIAM J Probl Kibernetiki 10: 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross JG (1967) Some theoretic characteristics of economic and political coalitions. J Confl Resolut 11: 184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Maschler M (1965) The kernel of a cooperative game. Nav Res Logist Quart 12(3): 223–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies DB (1959) Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. Contributions Theory Games 4: 47–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie R, Oddou C (1979) On economic games which are not necessarily superadditive: solution concepts and application to a local public good problem with few a agents. Econ Lett 3(4): 301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S (1985) An axiomatization of Harsanyi’s nontransferable utility solution. Econometrica 53:1295– 1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokari T, Kibris Ö (2003) Consistency, converse consistency, and aspirations in tu-games. Math Soc Sci 45(3): 313–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang YA, Sudhölter P (2001) Axiomatizations of the core on the universal domain and other natural domains. Int J Game Theory 29(4): 597–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiding H (1986) An axiomatization of the core of a cooperative game. Econ Lett 20(2):111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiding H (2006) An axiomatization of the aspiration core. Game Theory Math Econ 71:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldovanu B, Winter E (1994) Consistent demands for coalition formation. In: Megiddo N (ed) Essays in game theory in honor of Michael Maschler. Springer, New York, pp 129–140

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orshan G, Sudhölter P (2010) The positive core of a cooperative game. Int J Game Theory 39(1): 113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg B (1985) An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments. J Math Econ 14(2): 203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg B (1986) On the reduced game property and its converse. Int J Game Theory 15(3): 187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg B (1989) An axiomatization of the core of market games. Math Oper Res 14(3): 448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1969) The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J Appl Math 17(6): 1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano R, Volij O (1998) Axiomatizations of neoclassical concepts for economies. J Math Econ 30: 87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games. contributions to the theory of games. In Annals of mathematics studies, vol 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317

  • Shapley LS (1967) On balanced sets and cores. Nav Res Logist Quart 14(4): 453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey WW (1993) A characterization of some aspiration solutions with an application to spatial games. Working paper 95, Bell Communications-Economic Research Group

  • Sun N, Trockel W, Yang Z (2008) Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game. J Math Econ 44(7–8): 853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadenuma K (1992) Reduced games, consistency, and the core. Int J Game Theory 20(4): 325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorneveld M, Van Den Nouweland A (1998) A new axiomatization of the core of games with transferable utility. Econ Lett 60(2): 151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Camilo Gómez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bejan, C., Gómez, J.C. Axiomatizing core extensions. Int J Game Theory 41, 885–898 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-011-0316-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-011-0316-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation