Skip to main content
Log in

How canonical is the canonical model? A comment on Aumann's interactive epistemology

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Aumann (1989) argued that the natural partitions on the space of all maximally consistent sets of formulas in multi-player S5 logic are necessarily “commonly known” by the players. We show, however, that there are many other sets of partitions on this space that conform with the formulas that build the states – as many as there are subsets of the continuum! Thus, assuming a set of partitions on this space is “common knowledge” is an informal but meaningful meta-assumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heifetz, A. How canonical is the canonical model? A comment on Aumann's interactive epistemology. Game Theory 28, 435–442 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050118

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050118

Navigation