Skip to main content
Log in

The Balloon Popping Problem Revisited: Lower and Upper Bounds

  • Published:
Theory of Computing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the balloon popping problem introduced by Immorlica et al. (Proceedings of FOCS’07, pp. 104–112, 2007). This problem is directly related to the problem of profit maximization in online auctions, where an auctioneer is selling a collection of identical items to anonymous unit-demand bidders. The auctioneer has the full knowledge of bidders’ private valuations for the items and tries to maximize his profit. Compared with the profit of fixed price schemes, the competitive ratio of Immorlica et al.’s algorithm was in the range [1.64,4.33]. In this paper, we narrow the gap to [1.6595,2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams, Z.: Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets. In: Proceedings of SODA’06, pp. 1074–1082 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andelman, N., Mansour, Y.: Auctions with budget constraints. In: Proceedings of SWAT’04, pp. 26–38 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balcan, M.F., Blum, A., Mansour, Y.: Item pricing for revenue maximization. In: Proceedings of EC’08, pp. 50–59 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Yossef, Z., Hildrum, K., Wu, F.: Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods. In: Proceedings of SODA’02, pp. 964–970 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blum, A., Hartline, J.: Near-optimal online auctions. In: Proceedings of SODA’05, pp. 1156–1163 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Saberi, A.: Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders. In: Proceedings of EC’05, pp. 44–51 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dobzinski, S.: Two randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of APPROX-RANDOM’07, pp. 89–103 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of STOC’06, pp. 644–652 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dvoretzky, A., Motzkin, Th.: A problem of arrangements. Duke Math. J. 14, 305–313 (1947)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Feige, U.: On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. In: Proceedings of STOC’06, pp. 41–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guruswami, V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R., Kempe, D., Kenyon, C., McSherry, F.: On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing. In: Proceedings of SODA’05, pp. 1164–1173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Immorlica, N., Karlin, A.R., Mahdian, M., Talwar, K.: Balloon popping with applications to ascending auctions. In: Proceedings of FOCS’07, pp. 104–112 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahdian, M., Saberi, A.: Multi-unit auctions with unknown supply. In: Proceedings of EC’06, pp. 243–249 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U., Vazirani, V.: Adwords and generalized on-line matching. In: Proceedings of FOCS’05, pp. 264–273 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mirrokni, V., Schapira, M., Vondrak, J.: Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of EC’08, pp. 70–77 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohanty, S.G.: Lattice Path Counting and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Young, R.M.: Euler’s constant. Math. Gaz. 75(472), 187–190 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Yong Chwa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, H., Chwa, KY. The Balloon Popping Problem Revisited: Lower and Upper Bounds. Theory Comput Syst 49, 182–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-011-9314-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-011-9314-y

Keywords

Navigation