Skip to main content
Log in

Approximability of open k-monopoly problems

  • Published:
Theory of Computing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider approximability of two optimization problems called Minimum Open k-Monopoly (Min-Open-k-Monopoly) and Minimum Partial Open k-Monopoly (Min-P-Open-k-Monopoly), where k is a fixed positive integer. The objective, in Min-Open-k-Monopoly, is to find a minimum cardinality vertex set \(S \subseteq V\) in a given graph G = (V,E) such that \(|N(v) \cap S| \geq \frac {1}{2} |N(v)| + k\), for every vertex vV. On the other hand, given a graph G = (V,E), in Min-P-Open-k-Monopoly it is required to find a minimum cardinality vertex set \(S \subseteq V\) such that \(|N(v) \cap S| \geq \frac {1}{2} |N(v)| + k\), for every vVS. We prove that Min-Open-k-Monopoly and Min-P-Open-k-Monopoly are approximable within a factor of \(O(\log n)\). Then, we show that these two problems cannot be approximated within a factor of \((\frac {1}{3} - \epsilon )\ln n\) and \((\frac {1}{4} - \epsilon )\ln n\), respectively, for any 𝜖 > 0, unless \(\mathsf {NP} \subseteq \mathsf {Dtime}(n^{O(\log \log n)}).\) For 4-regular graphs, we prove that these two problems are APX-complete. Min-Open-1-Monopoly can be approximated within a factor of \(\frac {26}{21} \approx 1.2381\) where as Min-P-Open-1-Monopoly can be approximated within a factor of 1.65153. For k ≥ 2, we also present approximation algorithms for these two problems for (2k + 2)-regular graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alimonti, P., Kann, V.: Some apx-completeness results for cubic graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 237(1), 123–134 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bermond, J.-C., Bond, J., Peleg, D., Perennes, S.: The power of small coalitions in graphs. Discret. Appl. Math. 127(3), 399–414 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsimas, D., Vohra, R.: Rounding algorithms for covering problems. Math. Program. 80(1), 63–89 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Feige, U.: A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J. ACM (JACM) 45(4), 634–652 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Halldórsson, M. M., Radhakrishnan, J.: Greed is good Approximating independent sets in sparse and bounded-degree graphs. Algorithmica 18(1), 145–163 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedetniemi, S., Hedetniemi, S., Kristiansen, P.: Alliances in graphs. J. Combin. Math Combin. Comput. 48, 157–177 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hochbaum, D.S.: Efficient bounds for the stable set, vertex cover and set packing problems. Discret. Appl. Math. 6(3), 243–254 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, J.M., Yannakakis, M.: The node-deletion problem for hereditary properties is np-complete. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 20(2), 219–230 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Linial, N., Peleg, D., Rabinovich, Y., Saks, M.: Sphere packing and local majorities in graphs. In: Theory and Computing Systems, 1993., Proceedings of the 2nd Israel Symposium on the, pp 141–149. IEEE (1993)

  10. Mishra, S.: Complexity of majority monopoly and signed domination problems. J. Discrete Algorithms 10, 49–60 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra, S., Radhakrishnan, J., Sivasubramanian, S.: On the hardness of approximating minimum monopoly problems. In: FSTTCS, pp 277–288. Springer (2002)

  12. Papadimitriou, C.H., Yannakakis, M.: Optimization, approximation, and complexity classes. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 43(3), 425–440 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Peleg, D.: Local majority voting, small coalitions and controlling monopolies in graphs: A review. In: Proceedings of 3rd Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity, pp 152–169 (1997)

  14. Shafique, K., Dutton, R.: A tight bound on the cardinalities of maximum alliance-free and minimum alliance-cover sets. J. Comb. Math. Comb. Comput. 56, 139 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yero, I.G., Peterin, I., Kuziak, D.: Open k-monopolies in graphs: complexity and related concepts. Discret. Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 18 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped to improve the clarity, correctness and presentation of an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sounaka Mishra.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S., Krishna, B.A. & Rajakrishnan, S. Approximability of open k-monopoly problems. Theory Comput Syst 65, 798–814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-10027-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-10027-4

Keywords

Navigation