Skip to main content
Log in

Der Bazar der Anforderungen

Open Innovation in emergenten Communities

  • HAUPTBEITRAG
  • DER BAZAR DER ANFORDERUNGEN
  • Published:
Informatik-Spektrum Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Traditionelles Requirements Engineering ist auf die Ermittlung, Festschreibung und Nachvollziehbarkeit von Anforderungen in den Informationssystemen einer Organisation fokussiert. Die fortschreitende Globalisierung und Vernetzung hat neue Formen der Zusammenarbeit und der informationstechnischen Unterstützung hervorgebracht. Auf Basis von zwei Fallstudien zu offenen Innovationsprozessen haben wir die Anforderungen an ein adaptives Requirements Engineering für emergente Communities ermittelt. Zur informatischen Unterstützung haben wir ein i*-Modell für die Beschreibung der wechselseitigen Abhängigkeiten zwischen den Communities und den von ihnen genutzten Informationssystemen aus der Sichtweise des adaptiven RE entwickelt. Wir unterstützen das adaptive RE durch einen Dienstbaukasten, der in die zu entwickelnden Informationssysteme integriert werden kann. Dadurch entsteht im Sinne der Open-Source-Bewegung ein Bazar von Anforderungen. Diesen Vorgang haben wir prototypisch in einen Store für webbasierte Widgets zur Gestaltung von personalisierten Lernumgebungen umgesetzt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hagel J, Brown JS (2005) The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chesbrough HW (2003) Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bächle M (2008) Ökonomische Perspektiven des Web 2.0 – Open Innovation, Social Commerce und Enterprise 2.0. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(2):129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muraschko I (2009) Cross-Community Communication Analysis and its Implications for Requirements Engineering and Project Management. Masterarbeit. RWTH Aachen

  5. Barcellini F, Détienne F, Burkhardt JM (2007) Cross-Participants: Fostering Design-Use Mediation in an Open Source Software Community. In: Proceedings of the ECCE 2007 Conference, London, 28–31 Aug 2007

  6. Bird C, Pattison D, D’Souza R, Filkov V, Devanbu P (2008) Latent Structure in Open Source Projects. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Georgia, pp 24–35

  7. Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(12):7821–7826

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown J S, Adler R P (2008) Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Rev 43(1):16–32

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson C (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Reilly T (2005) What Is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  11. Ramesh B, Jarke M (2001) Toward reference models for requirements traceability. IEEE Trans Softw Engin 27(1):58–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung G, Lee B (2010) Analysis on social network adoption according to the change of network topology – the impact of ,,Open API“ on the adoption of Facebook. Proc. 12th Intl. Conf. Electronic Commerce. Honolulu, pp 22–31

  13. Hirschman A (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty – Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA

  14. Sutcliffe AG (1995) Requirements Rationales: Integrating Approaches to Requirement Analysis. Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, pp 33–42

  15. von Hippel E (1986) Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Manag Sci 32(7): 791–805

  16. Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K, Sonnack M, von Hippel E (2003) Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development. Manag Sci 48(8):1042–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sitou W, Spanfelner B (2007) Towards Requirements Engineering for Context Adaptive Systems. In: Proceedings 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Washington, DC, pp 593–600

  18. Raymond ES (2005) The Cathedral and the Bazaar. http://www.catb.org/ esr/writings/cathedral bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  19. Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: ,,Free“ user-to-user assistance. Res Policy 32(6):923–943, doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00095-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. von Hippel E (2001) Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 42(4):82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cox A (1998) Cathedrals, Bazaars and the Town Council. http://slashdot.org/features/98/10/13/1423253.shtml, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  22. Michaelides R, Kehoe D (2007) Internet Communities and Open innovation: an Information System Design Methodology. In: 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Melbourne, Qld., pp 769–775

  23. Lohmann S, Dietzold S, Heim P, Heino N (2009) A web platform for social requirements engineering. In: Münch J, Liggesmeyer P (Eds) Software Engineering 2009 – Workshopband, 20–24 Sep 2009, Kaiserslautern, pp 309–315

  24. Decker B, Ras E, Rech J, Jaubert P, Rieth M (2007) Wikibased stakeholder participation in requirements engineering. IEEE Softw 24:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heß J, Offenberg S, Pipek V (2008) Community-Driven Development as participation? – Involving User Communities in a Software Design Process. In: Participatory Design Conference, Bloomington

  26. Castro-Herrera C, Cleland-Huang J, Mobasher B (2009) Enhancing stakeholder profiles to improve recommendations in online requirements elicitation. In: IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Atlanta, pp 37–46

  27. Baeza-Yates R, Calderón-Benavides L, González-Caro C (2006) The intention behind web queries. In: Crestani F, Ferragina P, Sanderson M (Eds) Proceedings of String Processing and Information Retrieval, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4209, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 98–109

  28. Strohmaier M, Kroell M (2009) Studying Databases of Intentions: Do Search Query Logs Capture Knowledge about Common Human Goals? In: The Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Redondo Beach, 1–4 Sep 2009

  29. Kroell M, Strohmaier M (2009) Analyzing Human Intentions in Natural Language Text. In: The Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Redondo Beach, 1–4 Sep 2009

  30. Yu E (1997) Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering, Washington D.C., 6–8 Jan 1997, pp 226–235

  31. Bryl V, Giorgini P, Mylopoulos J (2009) Designing socio-technical systems: from stakeholder goals to social networks. Requirem Engin 14(1):47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hannemann A, Hocken C, Klamma R (2009) Community Driven Elicitation of Requirements with Entertaining Social Software. In: Münch J, Liggesmeyer P (eds) Software Engineering 2009 Workshop-Band, Kaiserslautern, pp 317–328

  33. Wang Y (2009) The CONTici Dashboard for Community-Aware Requirements Engineering. Diplomarbeit. RWTH Aachen

  34. Chatterjee A, Law E, Verbert K (2009) EU FP7 IP ROLE (Responsive Open Learning Environments) Deliverable 1.3/4: Functional and non-functional requirements analysis and specification. Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT, Sankt Augustin

  35. Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lave J, Wenger E (2001) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jarke M, Klamma R (2006) Reflective community information systems. In: Manolopoulos Y et al (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2006, Paphos

  38. Spaniol M, Klamma R, Janssen H, Renzel D (2006) LAS: A Lightweight Application Server for MPEG-7 Services in Community Engines. In: Tochtermann K, Maurer H (eds) Proceedings of I-KNOW ’06, 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, Austria, J.UCS Proceedings, Springer, pp 592–599

  39. Cao Y, Klamma R, Martini A (2008) Collaborative Storytelling in the Web 2.0. In: Proceedings First International Workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games at EC-TEL 08, Maastricht

  40. Sharda N (2005) Movement Oriented Design: A New Paradigm for Multimedia Design. Intern J Lat Comp 1:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dey A (2001) Understanding and Using Context. Pers Ubiquitous Comp 5(1):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Renzel D, Klamma R, Spaniol M (2008) MobSOS – A Testbed for Mobile Multimedia Community Services. In: 9th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, Klagenfurt, Mai 2008

  43. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  44. Kidane Y, Gloor P (2007) Correlating Temporal Communication Patterns of the Eclipse Open Source Community with Performance and Creativity. Comp Math Organ Theory 13(1):17–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Roger EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Google Inc.: OpenSocial Specification 1.1 DRAFT. http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/1.1/OpenSocial-Specification.xml, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  47. Cáceres M (2009) Widget Packaging and Configuration. W3C Candidate Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-20091201/, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  48. Recordon D, Hoyt J, Bufu J, Fitzpatrick B, Hardt D, et al (2007) OpenID Authentication 2.0 – Final Specification. http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0.html, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  49. Hammer-Lahav E, Recordon D, Hardt D (2010) The OAuth 2.0 Protocol. IETF Draft Standard. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-10, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  50. O’Reilly T, Batelle J (2009) Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Web 2.0 Summit Special Report. http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf, letzter Zugriff 16.10.2010

  51. Canetti E (1968) Die Stimmen von Marrakesch: Aufzeichnungen nach einer Reise. Fischer, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  52. Merton R (1968) The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159(3810):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Keen PGW (1981) Value Analysis: Justifying Decision Support Systems. MIS Quart 5(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Klamma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klamma, R., Jarke, M., Hannemann, A. et al. Der Bazar der Anforderungen. Informatik Spektrum 34, 178–191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0516-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0516-5

Navigation