Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing the landside operation of a container terminal

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the problem of operating a landside container exchange area that is serviced by multiple semi-automated rail mounted gantry cranes (RMGs) that are moving on a single bi-directional traveling lane. Such a facility is being built by Patrick Corporation at the Port Botany terminal in Sydney. The gantry cranes are a scarce resource and handle the bulk of container movements. Thus, they require a sophisticated analysis to achieve near optimal utilization. We present a three-stage algorithm to manage the container exchange facility, including the scheduling of cranes, the control of associated short-term container stacking, and the allocation of delivery locations for trucks and other container transporters. The key components of our approach are a time scale decomposition, whereby an integer program controls decisions across a long time horizon to produce a balanced plan that is fed to a series of short time scale online subproblems, and a highly efficient space-time divisioning of short-term storage areas. A computational evaluation shows that our heuristic can find effective solutions for the planning problem; on real-world data it yields a solution at most 8% above a lower bound on optimal RMG utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke K (2002) Modeling and optimization of the inter-model terminal Mega Hub. OR Spectrum 24:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballas A, Golias J (2002) Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals. Transp Res A 36:593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramel J, Chen X, Simchi-Levi D (2005) The logic of logistics: theory, algorithms, and applications for logistics and supply chain management, 2nd Edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung RK, Li C-L, Lin W (2002) Interblock crane deployment in container terminals. Transp Sci 36(1): 79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry P, Kozan E (2006) An assignment model of dynamic load planning of intermodel trains. Comput Oper Res 33:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker R, Voogd P, van Asperen E (2006) Advanced methods for container stacking. OR Spectrum 28:563–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther H-O, Kim KH (2005) Container terminals and automated transport systems. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Günther H-O, Kim KH (2006) Container terminals and terminal operations. OR Spectrum 28:437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillet P, Wagner MR(2006) Online routing problems: value of advanced information as improved competitive ratios. Transp Sci 40:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH (2005) Models and methods for operations in port container terminals. In: Langevin A, Riopel D (eds) Logistics systems: design and optimization, Gerad 25th Anniversary Series, chap. 7. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 213–243

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Park YM, Ryu KR (2000) Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards. Eur J Oper Res 124:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch T (2004) Rapid mathematical programming. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin

  • Kozan E (2000) Optimising container transfers at multi-modal terminals. Math Comput Modell 31:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozan E, Preston P (2006) Mathematical modelling of container transfers and storage locations at seaport terminals. OR Spectrum 28:519–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2006) An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs. OR Spectrum 28:539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy CSR, Manimaran G (2001) Resource management in real-time systems and networks. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng WC (2005) Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference. Eur J Oper Res 164:64–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruhs KR, Sgall J, Torng E (2004) Online scheduling. In: JY-T, Leung (ed) Handbook of scheduling: algorithms, models, and performance analysis, chap 15. Chapman & Hall/CRC

  • Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research—a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26(1):3–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wan YW, Liu J, Linn R (2002) Dynamic crane deployment in the container storage yards. Transp Res B 36(6):537–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Koch.

Additional information

Research supported by Patrick Technology and Systems, the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematics and Statistics of Complex Systems (MASCOS), and the German Research Foundation Research Center Mathematics for key technologies: Modelling, simulation, and optimization of real-world processes (Matheon).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Froyland, G., Koch, T., Megow, N. et al. Optimizing the landside operation of a container terminal. OR Spectrum 30, 53–75 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-007-0082-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-007-0082-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation