Skip to main content
Log in

Hesitant fuzzy programming technique for multidimensional analysis of hesitant fuzzy preferences

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preferences (LINMAP) is the most representative method for handling the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems with respect to the preference information over alternatives. This paper utilizes the main structure of LINMAP to develop a novel hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming technique to handle MCDM problems within the decision environment of hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs). Considering the hesitancy of the decision maker, both the pair-wise comparison preference information over alternatives and the evaluation information of alternatives with criteria are represented by the HFEs. Based on the incomplete pair-wise preference judgments over alternatives, we propose the concepts of the hesitant fuzzy consistency and inconsistency indices. Furthermore, we construct a hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming model to derive the weights of criteria and the positive-ideal solution. In this hesitant fuzzy programming model both the objective function and partial constraints’ coefficients take the form of HFEs, and an effective approach based on the ranking method of HFEs is further developed to solve the new derived model. To address the incomplete and inconsistent preference structures of criteria weights, we introduce several deviation variables and establish the bi-objective nonlinear programming model. At length, we employ a green supplier selection problem to illustrate the feasibility and applicability of the proposed technique and conduct a comparison analysis to validate its effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedregal B, Reiser R, Bustince H, Lopez-Molina C, Torra V (2014) Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms. Inf Sci 255:82–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereketli I, Erol Genevois M, Esra Albayrak Y, Ozyol M (2011) WEEE treatment strategies’ evaluation using fuzzy LINMAP method. Expert Syst Appl 38:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2013) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy LINMAP method with inclusion comparison possibilities and hybrid averaging operations for multiple criteria group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 45:134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2014) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf Sci 261:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2015) An interval type-2 fuzzy LINMAP method with approximate ideal solutions for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf Sci 297:50–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li D-F, Wan S-P (2013) Fuzzy linear programming approach to multiattribute decision making with multiple types of attribute values and incomplete weight information. Appl Soft Comput 13:4333–4348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D-F, Wan S-P (2014) Fuzzy heterogeneous multiattribute decision making method for outsourcing provider selection. Expert Syst Appl 41:3047–3059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D-F, Yang J-B (2004) Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments. Inf Sci 158:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D-F, Chen G-H, Huang Z-G (2010) Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets. Inf Sci 180:1591–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Kim SH (1997) Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information. Eur J Oper Res 98:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei Z, Yi L (2015) A note on operations of hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8:226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Torra V, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2014) Hesitant fuzzy sets: state of the art and future directions. Int J Comput Intell Syst 29(6):495–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadi-Nezhad S, Akhtari P (2008) Possibilistic programming approach for fuzzy multidimensional analysis of preference in group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 8:1703–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Shocker AD (1973) Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika 38:337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S-P, Li D-F (2013) Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. Omega 41:925–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Chan HK (2013) A hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS approach to assess improvement areas when implementing green supply chain initiatives. Int J Prod Res 51:3117–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z-J, Li KW (2012) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute group decision making framework with incomplete preference over alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 39:13509–13516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ, Wang DD, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2014) Multi-criteria outranking approach with hesitant fuzzy sets. OR Spectr 36:1001–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reas 52:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011a) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011b) On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst 26:410–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Zhang XL (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl Based Syst 52:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZM (2013) Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 234:150–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Wei GW (2013) Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Appl Math Model 37(7):4938–4947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl Based Syst 61:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2015) Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst Appl 42(2):873–884

  • Zhang H, Zheng Q, Liu T, Yang Z, Liu J (2013) A discrete region-based approach to improve the consistency of pair-wise comparison matrix. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 1–7 July 2013

  • Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that have led to an improved version of this paper. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61273209, 71263020629 and 71363020), and the Central University Basic Scientific Research Business 526 Expenses Project (No. skgt201501).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeshui Xu.

Appendix

Appendix

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \min \;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} \left\{ {0.5,0.6,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{12} +\left\{ {0.6,0.65,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{23} +\left\{ {0.8,0.85,0.9} \right\} \otimes z_{24} +\left\{ {0.5,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{25} \\ +\left\{ {0.4,0.5,0.6} \right\} \otimes z_{31} +\left\{ {0.6,0.7,0.95} \right\} \otimes z_{34} +\left\{ {0.7,0.9} \right\} \otimes z_{45} \\ \end{array}} \right\} \\ \mathrm{s.t.}\;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} -0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 + 0.0667\vartheta _1^1 -0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{12} \ge 0 \\ -0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 + 0.0933w_4 + 0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 +z_{23} \ge 0 \\ -0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 + 0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 +0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 \\ -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{24} \ge 0 \\ 0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 +0.267\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.267\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{25} \ge 0 \\ 0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 + 0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{31} \ge 0 \\ 0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{34} \ge 0 \\ 0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 +z_{45} \ge 0 \\ \left\{ {0.5,0.6,0.7} \right\} \otimes (-0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 + 0.0667\vartheta _1^1 \\ -0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.6,0.65,0.7} \right\} \otimes (-0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 + 0.0933w_4 + 0.133\vartheta _1^1 \\ + 0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.8,0.85,0.9} \right\} \otimes (-0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 + 0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ + 0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ + \left\{ {0.5,0.7} \right\} \otimes (0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 \\ + 0.267\vartheta _2^2 +0.267\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.4,0.5,0.6} \right\} \otimes (0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 +0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.6,0.7,0.95} \right\} \otimes (0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.7,0.9} \right\} \otimes (0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 ){\succeq }\left\{ {0.01} \right\} \\ w_4 \ge w_1 ,\;0.05\le w_2 -w_2 \le 0.3,\;\;w_4 -w_3 \ge w_2 -w_1 ,\;w_2 \ge 2w_1 ,\;0.15\le w_4 \le 0.5 \\ w_1 +w_2 +w_3 +w_4 =1,\;0.01\le w_j \le 1\quad (j=1,2,3,4) \\ z_{12} ,z_{23} ,z_{24} ,z_{31} ,z_{34} ,z_{25} ,z_{45} \ge 0 \\ 0\le \vartheta _j^1 \le \vartheta _j^2 \le \vartheta _j^3 \le w_j \;(j=1,2,3,4) \\ \end{array}} \right. \\ \end{array}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(5.1)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \min \;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} \left\{ {0.5,0.6,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{12} +\left\{ {0.6,0.65,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{23} +\left\{ {0.8,0.85,0.9} \right\} \otimes z_{24} +\left\{ {0.5,0.7} \right\} \otimes z_{25} \\ +\left\{ {0.4,0.5,0.6} \right\} \otimes z_{31} +\left\{ {0.6,0.7,0.95} \right\} \otimes z_{34} +\left\{ {0.7,0.9} \right\} \otimes z_{45} \\ \end{array}} \right\} \\ \min \left\{ {\varpi _{141}^- +\varpi _{132}^- +\varpi _{223}^- +\varpi _{223}^+ +\varpi _{34321}^- +\varpi _{421}^- +\varpi _{54}^+ +\varpi _{54}^- } \right\} \\ \mathrm{s.t.}\;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} -0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 + 0.0667\vartheta _1^1 -0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{12} \ge 0 \\ -0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 + 0.0933w_4 + 0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 +z_{23} \ge 0 \\ -0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 + 0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 +0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 \\ -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{24} \ge 0 \\ 0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 +0.267\vartheta _2^2 +0.267\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{25} \ge 0 \\ 0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 + 0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{31} \ge 0 \\ 0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{34} \ge 0 \\ 0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 +z_{45} \ge 0 \\ \left\{ {0.5,0.6,0.7} \right\} \otimes (-0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 + 0.0667\vartheta _1^1 -0.2\vartheta _1^2 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.6,0.65,0.7} \right\} \otimes (-0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 + 0.0933w_4 + 0.133\vartheta _1^1 \\ +0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 ) \\ + \left\{ {0.8,0.85,0.9} \right\} \otimes (-0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 + 0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ +0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.5,0.7} \right\} \otimes (0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 \\ +0.267\vartheta _2^2 +0.267\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.4,0.5,0.6} \right\} \otimes (0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 +0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.6,0.7,0.95} \right\} \otimes (0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +\left\{ {0.7,0.9} \right\} \otimes (0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 ){\succeq }\left\{ {0.01} \right\} \\ z_{12} ,z_{23} ,z_{24} ,z_{31} ,z_{34} ,z_{25} ,z_{45} \ge 0 \\ 0\le \vartheta _j^1 \le \vartheta _j^2 \le \vartheta _j^3 \le w_j \;(j=1,2,3,4) \\ w_4 +\varpi _{141}^- \ge w_1 , w_3 +\varpi _{132}^- \ge w_2 ,w_2 -w_3 \;+\varpi _{223}^- \ge 0.05\text{, } w_2 -w_3 -\varpi _{223}^+ \le 0.3, \; \\ w_4 -w_3 -w_2 +w_1 +\varpi _{34321}^- \ge 0 \text{, } {w_2 } /{w_1 }+\varpi _{421}^- \ge 2, w_4 -\varpi _{54}^+ \le 0.5,\;w_4 +\varpi _{54}^- \ge 0.15\; \\ w_1 +w_2 +w_3 +w_4 =1,\;\;0.01\le w_j \le 1\quad (j=1,2,3,4) \\ \varpi _{141}^- ,\varpi _{132}^- ,\varpi _{223}^- ,\varpi _{223}^+ ,\varpi _{34321}^- ,\varpi _{421}^- ,\varpi _{54}^+ ,\varpi _{54}^- \ge 0 \\ \end{array}} \right. \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(5.2)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \min \;\left\{ \chi \right\} \\ \mathrm{s.t.}\;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} 0.6z_{12} +0.65z_{23} +0.85z_{24} +0.6z_{25} +0.5z_{31} +0.75z_{34} +0.8z_{45} \le \chi \\ \varpi _{141}^- +\varpi _{132}^- +\varpi _{223}^- +\varpi _{223}^+ +\varpi _{34321}^- +\varpi _{421}^- +\varpi _{54}^+ +\varpi _{54}^- \le \chi \\ -0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 +0.0667\vartheta _1^1 -0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{12} \ge 0 \\ -0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 +0.0933w_4 +0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 +z_{23} \ge 0 \\ -0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 +0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 +0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 \\ -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{24} \ge 0 \\ 0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 +0.267\vartheta _2^2 +0.267\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{25} \ge 0 \\ 0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 +0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 +z_{31} \ge 0 \\ 0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 +z_{34} \ge 0 \\ 0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 \\ +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 +z_{45} \ge 0 \\ 0.6\times (-0.00667w_1 +0.157w_2 +0.0175w_3 -0.321w_4 +0.0667\vartheta _1^1 -0.2\vartheta _1^2 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.0333\vartheta _2^3 +0.133\vartheta _4^1 +0.167\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +0.65\times (-0.133w_1 -0.137w_2 +0.0433w_3 + 0.0933w_4 +0.133\vartheta _1^1 \\ +0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^2 +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 -0.0667\vartheta _3^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.0667\vartheta _4^2 ) \\ +0.85\times (-0.09w_1 -0.39w_2 +0.522w_3 -0.345w_4 + 0.333\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ +0.2\vartheta _2^2 +0.2\vartheta _2^3 -0.2\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.267\vartheta _4^1 +0.233\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +0.6\times (0.203w_1 -0.48w_2 -0.0983w_3 -0.095w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 -0.133\vartheta _1^3 \\ +0.267\vartheta _2^2 +0.267\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.1\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.0333\vartheta _4^1 +0.1\vartheta _4^2 +0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +0.5\times (0.14w_1 -0.02w_2 -0.608w_3 +0.288w_4 -0.2\vartheta _1^1 -0.0667\vartheta _1^2 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 -0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.0667\vartheta _3^1 +0.0333\vartheta _3^2 -0.0667\vartheta _4^1 -0.1\vartheta _4^2 -0.133\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +0.75\times (0.0433w_1 -0.253w_2 +0.478w_3 -0.438w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 +0.2\vartheta _1^2 +0.0667\vartheta _1^3 \\ -0.0667\vartheta _2^2 +0.133\vartheta _2^3 -0.133\vartheta _3^1 -0.233\vartheta _3^2 -0.3\vartheta _3^3 +0.333\vartheta _4^1 +0.3\vartheta _4^2 +0.3\vartheta _4^3 ) \\ +0.8\times (0.293w_1 -0.09w_2 -0.63w_3 +0.25w_4 -0.133\vartheta _1^1 -0.133\vartheta _1^2 +0.2\vartheta _1^3 +0.0667\vartheta _2^2 \\ +0.0667\vartheta _2^3 +0.267\vartheta _3^1 +0.333\vartheta _3^2 +0.0333\vartheta _3^3 -0.3\vartheta _4^1 -0.133\vartheta _4^2 -0.167\vartheta _4^3 )\ge 0.01 \\ z_{12} ,z_{23} ,z_{24} ,z_{31} ,z_{34} ,z_{25} ,z_{45} \ge 0 \\ w_4 +\varpi _{141}^- \ge w_1 , w_3 +\varpi _{132}^- \ge w_2 ,w_2 -w_3 \;+\varpi _{223}^- \ge 0.05\text{, } w_2 -w_3 -\varpi _{223}^+ \le 0.3, \; \\ w_4 -w_3 -w_2 +w_1 +\varpi _{34321}^- \ge 0 \text{, } {w_2 } /{w_1 }+\varpi _{421}^- \ge 2, w_4 -\varpi _{54}^+ \le 0.5,\;w_4 +\varpi _{54}^- \ge 0.15\; \\ w_1 +w_2 +w_3 +w_4 =1,\;\;0.01\le w_j \le 1\quad (j=1,2,3,4) \\ 0\le \vartheta _j^1 \le \vartheta _j^2 \le \vartheta _j^3 \le w_j \;(j=1,2,3,4) \\ \varpi _{141}^- ,\varpi _{132}^- ,\varpi _{223}^- ,\varpi _{223}^+ ,\varpi _{34321}^- ,\varpi _{421}^- ,\varpi _{54}^+ ,\varpi _{54}^- \ge 0 \\ \end{array}} \right. \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(5.3)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \min \;\left\{ {\left\langle {0.5,0.3} \right\rangle z_{12} +\left\langle {0.6,0.3} \right\rangle z_{23} +\left\langle {0.8,01} \right\rangle z_{24} +\left\langle {0.5,0.3} \right\rangle z_{25} +\left\langle {0.4,0.4} \right\rangle z_{31} +\left\langle {0.6,0.05} \right\rangle z_{34} +\left\langle {0.7,0.1} \right\rangle z_{45} } \right\} \\ \mathrm{s.t.}\;\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} 0.2u_2 -0.1u_1 +0.6u_4 -0.2v_1 +0.4v_2 -0.2v_4 +0.13w_1 -0.26w_2 -0.1w_4 +z_{12} \ge 0 \\ 0.2u_2 -0.2u_1 +0.1u_3 +0.5u_4 -0.4v_1 +0.1v_2 +0.2v_3 +0.2v_4 +0.28w_1 -0.17w_2 -0.14w_3 -0.13w_4 +z_{23} \ge 0 \\ 0.2u_1 +0.3u_2 -0.6u_3 +0.2u_4 +0.1v_1 -0.3v_2 +0.15v_3 -0.35v_4 -0.14w_1 -0.19w_2 -0.3675w_3 -0.02w_4 +z_{24} \ge 0 \\ 0.4u_2 -0.2u_1 +0.05u_4 +0.2v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.15v_3 +0.3v_4 -0.36w_1 -0.48w_2 +0.0725w_3 -0.595w_4 +z_{25} \ge 0 \\ 0.3u_1 -0.4u_2 -0.1u_3 +0.5u_4 +0.6v_1 -0.5v_2 -0.2v_3 -0.48w_1 +0.36w_2 +0.13w_3 +0.22w_4 +z_{31} \ge 0 \\ 0.4u_1 +0.1u_2 -0.7u_3 +0.1u_4 +0.5v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.05v_3 -0.55v_4 -0.48w_1 +0.07w_2 +0.4825w_3 +0.105w_4 +z_{34} \ge 0 \\ 0.4u_2 -0.2u_1 +0.05u_4 +0.2v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.15v_3 +0.3v_4 +0.04w_1 -0.08w_2 +0.0725w_3 -0.395w_4 +z_{45} \ge 0 \\ \left\langle {0.5,0.3} \right\rangle ( {0.2u_2 -0.1u_1 +0.6u_4 -0.2v_1 +0.4v_2 -0.2v_4 +0.13w_1 -0.26w_2 -0.1w_4 })\, + \\ \left\langle {0.6,0.3} \right\rangle (0.2u_2 -0.2u_1 + 0.1u_3 + 0.5u_4 -0.4v_1 +0.1v_2 +0.2v_3 +0.2v_4 + 0.28w_1 -0.17w_2 -0.14w_3 -0.13w_4 ) \,+ \\ \left\langle {0.8,01} \right\rangle ( {0.2u_1 + 0.3u_2 -0.6u_3 + 0.2u_4 +0.1v_1 -0.3v_2 +0.15v_3 -0.35v_4 -0.14w_1 -0.19w_2 -0.3675w_3 -0.02w_4 })\, + \\ \left\langle {0.5,0.3} \right\rangle (0.4u_2 -0.2u_1 + 0.05u_4 +0.2v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.15v_3 +0.3v_4 -0.36w_1 -0.48w_2 + 0.0725w_3 -0.595w_4 )\, + \\ \left\langle {0.4,0.4} \right\rangle (0.3u_1 -0.4u_2 -0.1u_3 +0.5u_4 +0.6v_1 -0.5v_2 -0.2v_3 -0.48w_1 +0.36w_2 + 0.13w_3 +0.22w_4 ) \,+ \\ \left\langle {0.6,0.05} \right\rangle (0.4u_1 + 0.1u_2 -0.7u_3 +0.1u_4 +0.5v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.05v_3 -0.55v_4 -0.48w_1 + 0.07w_2 + 0.4825w_3 \,+ \\ 0.105w_4 )+\left\langle {0.7,0.1} \right\rangle (0.4u_2 -0.2u_1 +0.05u_4 +0.2v_1 -0.4v_2 -0.15v_3 +\,0.3v_4\, + \\ 0.04w_1 -0.08w_2 +0.0725w_3 -0.395w_4 ){\succeq }\left\langle {0.01,0.99} \right\rangle \\ w_2 \ge 2w_1 ,\;0.05\le w_2 -w_2 \le 0.3,\;\;0.15\le w_4 \le 0.5 \\ w_1 +w_2 +w_3 +w_4 =1,\;0.05\le w_j \le 1\quad (j=1,2,3,4) \\ z_{12} {,}z_{23} {,}z_{24} {,}z_{31} {,}z_{34} {,}z_{25} {,}z_{45} \ge 0 \\ u_j ,v_j \ge 0,\;u_j +v_j \le w_j \quad (j=1,2,3,4) \\ \end{array}} \right. \\ \end{array}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(5.4)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Xu, Z. & Xing, X. Hesitant fuzzy programming technique for multidimensional analysis of hesitant fuzzy preferences. OR Spectrum 38, 789–817 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0420-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0420-0

Keywords

Navigation