Skip to main content
Log in

On a Predator–Prey System with Digestion Delay and Anti-predation Strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Nonlinear Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predator–prey interactions are among the most complicated interactions between biological species, in which there may be both direct effect (through predation) and indirect effect (e.g., fear effect). In the literature, the indirect effect has been largely missing in predator–prey models, until some recent works. Based on the recent work (Wang et al. in J Math Biol 73:1179–1204, 2016) where a fear effect is considered in an ODE model as a cost, in this paper, we also consider a benefit from the anti-predation response in addition to the cost, as well as a time delay in the transfer of biomass from the prey to the predator after predation. This results in a system of delay differential equations (DDEs). By analyzing this nonlinear DDE system, we obtain some insights on how the anti-predation response level (indirect effect) and the biomass transfer delay jointly affect the population dynamics; particularly we show how the nonlinearity in the predation term mediated by the fear effect affects the long term dynamics of the model system. We also perform some numerical computations and simulations to demonstrate our results. These results seem to suggest a need to revisit existing predator–prey models in the literature by incorporating the indirect effect and biomass transfer delay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P.A., Ginzburg, L.R.: The nature of predation: Prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 337–341 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, R., Ginzburg, L.R.: Coupling in predator–prey dynamics: ratio dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 311–326 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Chavez, C., Thieme, H.R.: Asymptotically autonomous epidemic models. In: Arino, O., et al. (eds.) Mathematical Population Dynamics: Analysis of Heterogeneity, I. Theory of Epidemics, pp. 33–50. Wuerz, Winnipeg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, S., Christianson, D.: Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 194–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, W.: Predation in bird populations. J. Ornithol. 152, 251–263 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J.M.: Integro-Differential Equations and Delay Models in Population Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 20. Springer, Berlin (1977)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Samanta, G.P.: Modeling the fear effect on a stochastic prey–predator system with additional food for the predator. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 51, 465601 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J.K., Lunel, S.M.V.: Introduction to Functional Differential Equations. Springer, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N.D.: Roots of the transcendental equations associated with a certain differential-difference equation. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 25, 226–232 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S.: The functional response of predator to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45, 1–60 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M., Tollrian, R.: Predator function responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol. Monogr. 72(1), 95–112 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Li, H.: Hopf bifurcation of a predator–prey model with time delay and stage structure for the prey. Math. Comput. Model. 55, 672–679 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L.: Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator–prey interactions. Bioscience 48, 25–34 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L.: Predators and the breeding bird: behavioural and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol. Rev. 84, 85–513 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J.: Analytical note on certain rhythmic relations in organic systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 6, 410–415 (1920)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J.: Elements of Physical Biology. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia (1925)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, S., Maiti, A., Samanta, G.P.: Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator–prey model. Biophys. Rev. Lett. 13, 157–177 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L., MacArthur, R.H.: Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator–prey interactions. Am. Nat. 97, 209–223 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski, G.T., Gilliam, J.F.: Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82, 3083–3092 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.: Monotone Dynamical Systems: An Introduction to the Theory of Competitive and Cooperative Systems. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 41. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.: An Introduction to Delay Differential Equations with Applications to the Life Sciences. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V.: Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. Acad. Lincei Roma 2, 31–113 (1926)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V.: Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together. In: Chapman, R.N. (ed.) Animal Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Zou, X.: Modeling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions with adaptive avoidance of predators. Bull. Math. Biol. 79, 1325–1359 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Zou, X.: Pattern formation of a predator–prey model with the cost of anti-predator behaviours. Math. Biosci. Eng. 15, 775–805 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Zanette, L.Y., Zou, X.: Modelling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions. J. Math. Biol. 73, 1179–1204 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wangersky, P.J., Cunningham, W.J.: Time lag in prey–predator population models. Ecology 38, 136–139 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, R.: Global dynamics of a predator-prey model with time delay and stage structure for the prey. Nonlinear Anal. RWA 12, 2151–2162 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zanette, L.Y., White, A.F., Allen, M.C., Clinchy, M.: Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science 334(6061), 1398–1401 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingfu Zou.

Additional information

Communicated by Sue Ann Campbell.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research partially supported by NSERC of Canada (RGPIN-2016-04665).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zou, X. On a Predator–Prey System with Digestion Delay and Anti-predation Strategy. J Nonlinear Sci 30, 1579–1605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-020-09618-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-020-09618-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation