Skip to main content
Log in

A characterization of prudent choices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We define and axiomatize prudent choices for two criteria. Given two criteria, the alternatives chosen by the prudent choice procedure are the ones maximizing some composition of the criteria. This composition is such that (1) it contains the first criterion and a part of the second one, and (2) the new binary relation is not cyclic and cannot be enlarged with preferences of the second criterion without becoming cyclic. We also make the link between prudent choices, classical rational choices, sequentially rational choices (Manzini and Mariotti in Am Econ Rev 97(5):1824–1839, 2007a) and lexicographic binary choice rational choices (Tadenuma in J Econ Theory 104(2):462–472, 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizerman MA (1985) New problems in the general choice theory. Soc Choice Welf 2: 235–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman MA, Aleskerov FT (1995) Theory of choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Raynaud H (1986) Social choice and multicriterion decision making. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair DH, Bordes G, Kelly JS, Suzumura K (1976) Impossibility theorems without collective rationality. J Econ Theory 13: 361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houy N (2007) Rationality and order-dependent sequential rationality. Theory Decis 62(2): 119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houy N, Tadenuma K (2007) Lexicographic compositions of two criteria for decision making. J Econ Theory (forthcoming)

  • Lamboray C (2007) A characterization of the prudent order preference function. Math Soc Sci 57: 389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamboray C (2009) A characterization of the ranked pairs rule. Soc Choice Welf (forthcoming)

  • Lansdowne Z (1996) Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making. Nav Res Logist 43: 613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdowne Z (1997) Outranking methods for multicriterion decision-making: arrow’s and raynaud’s conjecture. Soc Choice Welf 14: 125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini P, Mariotti M (2007a) Sequentially rationalizable choice. Am Econ Rev 97(5): 1824–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini P, Mariotti M (2007b) Shorlisting. Working paper EconWPA ewp-pe/0503006

  • Sen A (1977) Social choice theory: a re-examination. Econometrica 45(1): 53–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1993) Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica 61(3): 495–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadenuma K (2002) Efficiency first or equity first? two principles and rationality of social choice. J Econ Theory 104(2): 462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tideman TN (1987) Independent of clones as a criterion for voting rules. Soc Choice Welf 4(3): 185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavist TM, Tideman TN (1989) Complete independence of clones in the ranked pairs rule. Soc Choice Welf 6(2): 167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Houy.

Additional information

I would like to thank Koichi Tadenuma for his valuable remarks as well as an anonymous referee and an associate editor who helped to improve this article very significantly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houy, N. A characterization of prudent choices. Soc Choice Welf 34, 181–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0392-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0392-6

Keywords

Navigation