Skip to main content
Log in

Acyclic sets of linear orders: A progress report

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let f(n) be the maximum cardinality of an acyclic set of linear orders on {1, 2, … , n}. It is known that f(3)=4, f(4)=9, f(5)=20, and that all maximum-cardinality acyclic sets for n≤ 5 are constructed by an “alternating scheme”. We outline a proof that this scheme is optimal for n=6, where f (6)=45. It is known for large n that f (n) >(2.17)n and that no maximum-cardinality acyclic set conforms to the alternating scheme. Ran Raz recently proved that f (n)<c n for some c>0 and all n. We conjecture that f (n + m)≤f (n + 1) f (m + 1) for n , m≥ 1, which would imply f (n)<(2.591)n − 2 for all large n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 12 April 2000/Accepted: 4 December 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishburn, P. Acyclic sets of linear orders: A progress report. Soc Choice Welfare 19, 431–447 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100120

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100120

Navigation