Abstract.
A neurobiological argument has been used to defend the measurability and interpersonal comparability of cardinal utility. If true, a strong case could be made for the practical relevance of utility-based social welfare functions. In this paper I demonstrate that the current evidence does not corroborate the cardinal measurability and comparability of utility. Electrical stimulation of brain parts, or asymmetries in brain hemispherical activation, cannot be used to build a hedonimeter. The role of the neurotransmitter dopamine is that of a saliency detector or alternatively one validating adaptive learning models, but either way is not that of a general cardinal utility measure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 3 March 2000/Accepted: 8 January 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zizzo, D. Neurobiological measurements of cardinal utility: Hedonimeters or learning algorithms?. Soc Choice Welfare 19, 477–488 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100122
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100122