Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) Variables

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bounds of association coefficients for binary variables are derived using the arithmetic-geometric-harmonic mean inequality. More precisely, it is shown which presence/absence coefficients are bounds with respect to each other. Using the new bounds it is investigated whether a coefficient is in general closer to either its upper or its lower bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABRAMOWITZ, M. and STEGUN, I.A. (1972), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (9th print.), New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARONI-URBANI, C. and BUSER, M.W. (1976), “Similarity of Binary Data,” Systematic Zoology, 25, 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BATAGELJ, V. and BREN, M. (1995), “Comparing Resemblance Measures,” Journal of Classification, 12, 73–90.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BAULIEU, F.B. (1989), “A Classification of Presence/Absence Based Dissimilarity Coefficients,” Journal of Classification, 6, 233–246.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BAULIEU, F.B. (1997), “Two Variant Axiom Systems for Presence/absence Based Dissimilarity Coefficients,” Journal of Classification, 14, 159–170.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BLACKMAN, N. J.-M. and KOVAL, J.J. (1993), “Estimating Rater Agreement in 2 × 2 Tables: Correction for Chance and Intraclass Correlation,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOYCE, R.L. and ELLISON, P.C. (2001), “Choosing the Best Similarity Index when Performing Fuzzy Set Ordination on Binary Data,” Journal of Vegetational Science, 12, 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. (1932), Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Communities (Authorized English translation of Pflanzensoziologie), New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • BREN, M. and BATAGELJ, V. (2006), “The Metric Index,” Croatica Chemica Acta, 79, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • BULLEN, P.S. (2003), Handbook of Means and Their Inequalities, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, J. (1960), “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DICE, L.R. (1945), “Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species”, Ecology, 26, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FICHET, B. (1986), “Distances and Euclidean Distances for Presence-Absence Characters and Their Application to Factor Analysis,” in Multidimensional Data Analysis, eds., J. de Leeuw, W.J. Heiser, J.J. Meulman, and F. Critchley, Leiden: DSWO Press, pp. 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLEISS, J.L. (1975), “Measuring Agreement Between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait,” Biometrics, 31, 651–659.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GLEASON, H.A. (1920), “Some Applications of the Quadrat Method,” Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 47, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, L.A. and KRUSKAL, W. H. (1954), “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GOWER, J.C. (1986), “Euclidean Distance Matrices,” in Multidimensional Data Analysis, eds., J. de Leeuw, W.J. Heiser, J.J. Meulman, and F. Critchley, Leiden: DSWO Press, pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOWER, J.C. and LEGENDRE, P. (1986), “Metric and Euclidean Properties of Dissimilarity Coefficients,” Journal of Classification, 3, 5–48.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • HUBÁLEK, Z. (1982), “Coefficients of Association and Similarity Based on Binary (Presence-Absence) Data: An Evaluation,” Biological Reviews, 57, 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JACCARD, P. (1912), “The Distribution of the Flora in the Alpine Zone,” The New Phytologist, 11, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JANSON, S. and VEGELIUS, J. (1981), “Measures of Ecological Association,” Oecologia, 49, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KULCZYÑSKI, S. (1927), “Die Pflanzenassociationen der Pienenen,” Bulletin International de L’Acad´emie Polonaise des Sciences et des Letters, classe des sciences mathematiques et naturelles, Serie B, Suppl´ement II, 2, 57–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEVINGER, J.A. (1948), “The Technique of Homogeneous Tests Compared with Some Aspects of Scale Analysis and Factor Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAXWELL, A.E. and PILLINER, A.E.G. (1968), “Deriving Coefficients of Reliability and Agreement for Ratings,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 21, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCCONNAUGHEY, B.H. (1964), “The Determination and Analysis of Plankton Communities,” Marine Research, Special No, Indonesia, 1–40.

  • MICHAEL, E.L. (1920), “Marine Ecology and the Coefficient of Association: A Plea in Behalf of Quantitative Biology,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 8, 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCHIAI, A. (1957), “Zoogeographic Studies on the Soleoid Fishes Found in Japan and Its Neighboring Regions,” Bulletin of the Japanese Society for Fish Science, 22, 526–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUSSEL, P.F. and RAO, T.R. (1940), “On Habitat and Association of Species of Anopheline Larvae in South-Eastern Madras,” Journal of Malaria Institute India, 3, 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, W.A. (1955), “Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, G.G. (1943), “Mammals and the Nature of Continents,” American Journal of Science, 241, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOKAL, R.R. and MICHENER, C. D. (1958), “A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships”, University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 38, 1409–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOKAL, R.R. and SNEATH, R. H. (1963), Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • SORGENFREI, T. (1958), Molluscan Assemblages from the Marine Middle Miocene of South Jutland and Their Environments, Copenhagen: Reitzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • YULE, G.U. (1900), “On the Association of Attributes in Statistics,” Philosophical Transactions, Series A, 194, 257–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YULE, G.U. (1912), “On the Methods of Measuring the Association between Two Attributes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75, 579–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WARRENS, M.J. (2008), “On the Indeterminacy of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) Data,” Journal of Classification, 25, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthijs J. Warrens.

Additional information

The author would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions on earlier versions of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warrens, M.J. Bounds of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) Variables. J Classif 25, 195–208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-008-9024-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-008-9024-6

Keywords

Navigation