Abstract
In this paper we deal with the problem of identifying a valid way to characterize heterogeneity in the analysis of customer satisfaction observing the phenomenon through a new perspective. In the literature, the variability of a Customer Satisfaction index is measured by the standard deviation or the coefficient of variation. In this way, heterogeneity among customers may be masked. To overcome this drawback, we provide a new approach to the construction of a multi-dimensional measure of heterogeneity of the Customer Satisfaction index not depending on the choice of a particular heterogeneity index. The approach is based on heterogeneity profiles which lead to a more detailed description of heterogeneity than alternative measures. Moreover, a latent class model is used for classifying individuals into distinct groups based on responses to a set of items. Once groups are formed, Customer Satisfaction researchers can make conclusions about the level of satisfaction and the characteristics of groups in terms of heterogeneity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
AKAIKE, H. (1973), “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle”, in Second International Symposium on Information Theory, eds. B. Petrov and F. Csake, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–281.
CRONIN, J.J. Jr., and TAYLOR, S.A. (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Re-Examination and Extension”, Journal of Marketing, 56, 55–68.
MAGIDSON, J., and VERMUNT, J.K. (2001), “Latent Class Factor and Cluster Models, Bi-Plots and Related Graphical Displays”, Sociological Methodology, 31, 223–264.
MOUSTAKI, I. (1996), “A Latent Trait and a Latent Class Model for Mixed Observed Variables”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 313–334.
PATIL, G.P., and TAILLIE, C. (1979), “An Overview of Diversity”, in Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, eds. J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W.K. Smithad, and C. Taillie, Burtonsville: International Co-operative Publishing House, pp. 3–27.
PATIL, G.P., TAILLIE, C. (1982), “Diversity as a Concept and its Measurements”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 548–561.
PARASURAMAN, A., BERRY, L.L., and ZEITHAML, V.A. (1991), “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale”, Journal of Retailing, 67 (4), 420–450.
SCHWARTZ, G. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model”, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
THURSTONE, L.L. (1927), “The Unit of Measurement in Educational Scales, Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 505–524.
WRIGHT, B.D., and MASTERS, G.N. (1982), Rating Scale Analysis, Chicago: MESA Press.
ZANELLA A. (2001), Valutazione e modelli interpretativi di Customer Satisfaction: una presentazione di insieme, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Istituto di Statistica, Serie E. P. N. 105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valentini, P., Di Battista, T. & Antonio Gattone, S. Heterogeneity Measures in Customer Satisfaction Analysis. J Classif 28, 38–52 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-011-9075-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-011-9075-y