Skip to main content
Log in

Heterogeneity Measures in Customer Satisfaction Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we deal with the problem of identifying a valid way to characterize heterogeneity in the analysis of customer satisfaction observing the phenomenon through a new perspective. In the literature, the variability of a Customer Satisfaction index is measured by the standard deviation or the coefficient of variation. In this way, heterogeneity among customers may be masked. To overcome this drawback, we provide a new approach to the construction of a multi-dimensional measure of heterogeneity of the Customer Satisfaction index not depending on the choice of a particular heterogeneity index. The approach is based on heterogeneity profiles which lead to a more detailed description of heterogeneity than alternative measures. Moreover, a latent class model is used for classifying individuals into distinct groups based on responses to a set of items. Once groups are formed, Customer Satisfaction researchers can make conclusions about the level of satisfaction and the characteristics of groups in terms of heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • AKAIKE, H. (1973), “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle”, in Second International Symposium on Information Theory, eds. B. Petrov and F. Csake, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRONIN, J.J. Jr., and TAYLOR, S.A. (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Re-Examination and Extension”, Journal of Marketing, 56, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAGIDSON, J., and VERMUNT, J.K. (2001), “Latent Class Factor and Cluster Models, Bi-Plots and Related Graphical Displays”, Sociological Methodology, 31, 223–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOUSTAKI, I. (1996), “A Latent Trait and a Latent Class Model for Mixed Observed Variables”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 313–334.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • PATIL, G.P., and TAILLIE, C. (1979), “An Overview of Diversity”, in Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, eds. J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W.K. Smithad, and C. Taillie, Burtonsville: International Co-operative Publishing House, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • PATIL, G.P., TAILLIE, C. (1982), “Diversity as a Concept and its Measurements”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 548–561.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • PARASURAMAN, A., BERRY, L.L., and ZEITHAML, V.A. (1991), “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale”, Journal of Retailing, 67 (4), 420–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, G. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model”, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • THURSTONE, L.L. (1927), “The Unit of Measurement in Educational Scales, Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 505–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, B.D., and MASTERS, G.N. (1982), Rating Scale Analysis, Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZANELLA A. (2001), Valutazione e modelli interpretativi di Customer Satisfaction: una presentazione di insieme, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Istituto di Statistica, Serie E. P. N. 105.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasquale Valentini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valentini, P., Di Battista, T. & Antonio Gattone, S. Heterogeneity Measures in Customer Satisfaction Analysis. J Classif 28, 38–52 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-011-9075-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-011-9075-y

Keywords

Navigation