Skip to main content
Log in

Material characterization of composite laminates using dynamic response and real parameter-coded microgenetic algorithm

  • Original article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient nondestructive evaluation procedure is proposed for inversely determining material constants of composite laminates using dynamic response at one point on the plate surface. Material constants of composite laminates are determined by minimizing the difference between the measured dynamic response of the actual plate and the computed response of the plate with assumed material properties. For robust and efficient function minimization, a real parameter-coded microgenetic algorithm (real-μGA) is proposed on the basis of the existing binary coded uniform microgenetic algorithm (uniform μGA). Four different crossover operators are constructed for the real-μGA. Performances of the present real-μGA and the existing uniform μGA are studied using several typical benchmark test functions and an order-3 deceptive function. The present real-μGA is then implemented as the inverse solver in the minimization process of material characterization. From hundreds of tests conducted on the benchmark functions, the order-3 deceptive function, and the material characterization problems, it is found that the real-μGA is two to five times faster in converging to the global optimum compared with the uniform μGA. Numerical examples for material characterization of composite laminates have demonstrated the robustness, efficiency, and accuracy of the proposed procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayorinde EO, Gibson RF (1993) Elastic constants of orthotropic composite materials using plate resonance frequencies, classical lamination theory and an optimized three-mode Rayleigh formulation. Compos Eng 3:395–407

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balasubramaniam K, Rao NS (1998) Inversion of composite material elastic constants from ultrasonic bulk wave phase velocity data using genetic algorithms. Composite B 29B:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chai JF, Wu TT (1994) Determination of anisotropic elastic constants using laser generated surface waves. J Acoust Soc Am 95(6):3232–3241

    Google Scholar 

  4. David LC (1996) Genetic algorithms and optimizing chemical oxygen-iodine lasers. Dev Theor Appl Mech 411–424

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Jong KA (1975) An analysis of the behaviour of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Doctoral Disertation, University of Michigan

  6. Deobald LR, Gibson RF (1988) Determination of elastic constatnts of orthotropic plates by a modal analysis/Rayleigh-Ritz technique. J Sound Vibr 124:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dymek A (1992) An examination of hypercube implementation of genetic algorithms. M.S. and Report No. AFIT/GCS/ENG/92 M-02 Thesis, Air Force, Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

  8. Eshelman LJ (1989) The CHC adaptive search algorithm: how to have safe search when engaging in nontraditional genetic recombination. In: Spatz BM (ed) Foundations of genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 265–283

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg DE (1990) Real-coded genetic algorithms, virtual alphabets, and block. Technical report no. 90001, University of Illinois

  10. Goldberg DE, Korb B, Deb K (1989) Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first research. Complex Systems 3, Complex Systems Publications, pp 490–530

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hallquist JO (ed) (1998) LS_DYNA Theoretical manual. Livemore Software Technology Corporation

  12. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with application to biology, control and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  13. Janikow CZ, Michalewicz Z (1991) An experimental comparison of binary and floating-point representations in genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on genetic algorithms, pp 31–36

  14. Krishnakumar K (1989) Micro-genetic algorithms for stationary and non-stationary function optimization. In: SPIE: intelligent control and adaptive systems, Philadelphia, p 1196

  15. Omitted

  16. Man KF, Tang KS, Kwong S (1998) Genetic algorithms: concepts and designs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rose WR, Rokhlin SI, Adler L (1986) Evaluation of anisotropic properties of graphite composites using lamb waves. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructuve evaluation, vol 6B. Plenum, New York, p 1111

  18. Wright AH (1991) Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. In: Rawlins JE (ed) Foundations of genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 205–218

  19. Wu T-T, Liu Y-H (1999) On the measurement of anisotropic elastic constants of fiber-reinforced composite plate using ultrasonic bulk wave and laser generated lamb wave. Ultrasonics 37:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. J. Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, G.R., Ma, H.J. & Wang, Y.C. Material characterization of composite laminates using dynamic response and real parameter-coded microgenetic algorithm. Engineering with Computers 20, 295–308 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-004-0298-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-004-0298-y

Keywords

Navigation