Skip to main content
Log in

Designing a fuzzy cognitive map to evaluate drilling and blasting problems of the tunneling projects in Iran

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of drilling and blasting processes in excavation projects, especially in Iran, demonstrates various challenges and problems that eventually affect the technical and economic aspects of project performance. This paper introduces a methodology based on a computer-based fuzzy cognitive map approach to find and prioritize the problematic drilling and blasting factors in tunneling projects‏ in Iran. A particular cognitive map of the problem was designed by use of 34 problematic factors that selected by tunneling engineers in Iran. In the designed map, the weights of the problematic factors and their interactions were considered on the basis of the opinions of engineers. The designed map was finally solved by considering the causes and effects of the problematic factors. Results indicated that the most critical factors were respectively identified as the disregard for geomechanical changes, the lack of accurate drilling supervision and management, and the insufficient knowledge of blasting teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murthy VMSR., Dey K, Raitani R (2003) Prediction of over break in underground tunnel blasting a case study. J Can Tunn:109–115

  2. Rodriguez R, Torano J, Mene´ndez M (2007) Prediction of the airblast wave effects near a tunnel advanced by drilling and blasting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei XY, Zhao ZY, Gu J (2009) Numerical simulations of rock mass damage induced by underground explosion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1206–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez R, Lombardía C, Torno S (2010) Prediction of the air wave due to blasting inside tunnels: Approximation to a ‘phonometric curve’. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haibo L, Xiang X, Jianchun L, Jian Z, Bo L, Yaqun L (2011) Rock damage control in bedrock blasting excavation for a nuclear power plant. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton N (2012) Reducing risk in long deep tunnels by using TBM and drill-and-blast methods in the same project–the hybrid solution. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(2):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dey K, Murthy VMSR. (2012) Prediction of blast-induced overbreak from uncontrolled burn-cut blasting in tunnels driven through medium rock class. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia X, Li HB, Li JC, Liu B, Yu C (2013) A case study on rock damage prediction and control method for underground tunnels subjected to adjacent excavation blasting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 35:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardu M, Seccatore J (2016) Quantifying the difficulty of tunnelling by drilling and blasting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 60:178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng M, Prayogo D (2017) A novel fuzzy adaptive teaching–learning‑based optimization (FATLBO) for solving structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 33(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasanipanah M, Bagheri Golzar S, Abbasi Larki I, Yazdanpanah Maryaki M, · Ghahremanians T (2017) Estimation of blast-induced ground vibration through a soft computing framework. Eng Comput 33(4):951–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mottahedi A, Sereshki F, Ataei M (2017) Development of overbreak prediction models in drill and blast tunneling using soft computing methods. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0520-3

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shirani Faradonbeh R, Monjezi M, Jahed Armaghani D (2015) Genetic programing and non-linear multiple regression techniques to predict backbreak in blasting operation. Eng Comput 32(1):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakhtavar E, Khoshrou H, Badroddin M (2015) Using dimensional-regression analysis to predict the mean particle size of fragmentation by blasting at the Sungun copper mine. Arab J Geosci 8:2111–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasanipanah M, Jahed Armaghani D, Monjezi M, Shams S (2016) Risk assessment and prediction of rock fragmentation produced by blasting operation: a rock engineering system. Environ Earth Sci 75:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taheri K, Hasanipanah M, Bagheri Golzar S, Abd Majid MZ (2017) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm-artificial neural network for forecasting the blast-produced ground vibration. Eng Comput 33(3):689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasanipanah M, Shahnazar A, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Jahed Armaghani D (2017) Prediction of air-overpressure caused by mine blasting using a new hybrid PSO–SVR model. Eng Comput 33(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amiri M, Bakhshandeh Amineh H, Hasanipanah M, Mohammad Khanli L (2016) A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure. Eng Comput 32(4):631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fouladgar N, Hasanipanah M, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H (2017) Application of cuckoo search algorithm to estimate peak particle velocity in mine blasting. Eng Comput 33(2):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdollahisharif J, Bakhtavar E, Nourizadeh H (2016) Green biocompatible approach to reduce the toxic gases and dust caused by the blasting in surface mining. Environ Earth Sci 75:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakhtavar E, Abdollahisharif J, Ahmadi M (2017) Reduction of the undesirable bench-blasting consequences with emphasis on ground vibration using a developed multi-objective stochastic programming. Int J Min Reclam Environ 31(5):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakhtavar E, Nourizadeh H, Sahebi AA (2017) Toward predicting blast-induced flyrock: a hybrid dimensional analysis fuzzy inference system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Axelrod R (1976) Structure of decision: the cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24:65–75

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez-Repiso L, Setchi R, Salmeron JL (2007) Modelling IT projects success with fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider M, Shnaider E, Kandel A, Chew G (1998) Automatic construction of FCMs. Fuzzy Sets Syst 93:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the experts of the tunneling companies helped us during our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Bakhtavar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakhtavar, E., Shirvand, Y. Designing a fuzzy cognitive map to evaluate drilling and blasting problems of the tunneling projects in Iran. Engineering with Computers 35, 35–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0581-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0581-y

Keywords

Navigation