Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Boosted binary Harris hawks optimizer and feature selection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feature selection is a required preprocess stage in most of the data mining tasks. This paper presents an improved Harris hawks optimization (HHO) to find high-quality solutions for global optimization and feature selection tasks. This method is an efficient optimizer inspired by the behaviors of Harris' hawks, which try to catch the rabbits. In some cases, the original version tends to stagnate to the local optimum solutions. Hence, a novel HHO called IHHO is proposed by embedding the salp swarm algorithm (SSA) into the original HHO to improve the search ability of the optimizer and expand the application fields. The update stage in the HHO optimizer, which is performed to update each hawk, is divided into three phases: adjusting population based on SSA to generate SSA-based population, generating hybrid individuals according to SSA-based individual and HHO-based individual, and updating search agent in the light of greedy selection and HHO’s mechanisms. A large group of experiments on many functions is carried out to investigate the efficacy of the proposed optimizer. Based on the overall results, the proposed IHHO can provide a faster convergence speed and maintain a better balance between exploration and exploitation. Moreover, according to the proposed continuous IHHO, a more stable binary IHHO is also constructed as a wrapper-based feature selection (FS) approach. We compare the resulting binary IHHO with other FS methods using well-known benchmark datasets provided by UCI. The experimental results reveal that the proposed IHHO has better accuracy rates over other compared wrapper FS methods. Overall research and analysis confirm the improvement in IHHO because of the suitable exploration capability of SSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu Y et al (2019) An efficient chaotic mutative moth-flame-inspired optimizer for global optimization tasks. Expert Syst Appl 129:135–155

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luo J et al (2018) An improved grasshopper optimization algorithm with application to financial stress prediction. Appl Math Model 64:654–668

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Heidari AA, Pahlavani P (2017) An efficient modified grey wolf optimizer with Lévy flight for optimization tasks. Appl Soft Comput 60:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu G et al (2020) Predicting cervical hyperextension injury: a covariance guided sine cosine support vector machine. IEEE Access 8:46895–46908

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Q et al (2019) Chaos-induced and mutation-driven schemes boosting Salp chains-inspired optimizers. IEEE Access 7:31243–31261

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deng W, Xu J, Zhao H (2019) An improved ant colony optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategies for scheduling problem. IEEE Access 7:20281–20292

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deng W et al (2017) A novel collaborative optimization algorithm in solving complex optimization problems. Soft Comput 21(15):4387–4398

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deng W et al (2020) An improved quantum-inspired differential evolution algorithm for deep belief network. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.2983233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao X et al (2014) Feature selection based on improved ant colony optimization for online detection of foreign fiber in cotton. Appl Soft Comput 24:585–596

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang M, Chen H (2020) Chaotic multi-swarm whale optimizer boosted support vector machine for medical diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput 88:105946

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao X et al (2019) Chaos enhanced grey wolf optimization wrapped ELM for diagnosis of paraquat-poisoned patients. Comput Biol Chem 78:481–490

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu X, Chen H-L (2014) Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization. Soft Comput 18(4):797–807

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen L et al (2016) Evolving support vector machines using fruit fly optimization for medical data classification. Knowl-Based Syst 96:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang M et al (2017) Toward an optimal kernel extreme learning machine using a chaotic moth-flame optimization strategy with applications in medical diagnoses. Neurocomputing 267:69–84

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H et al (2020) An enhanced Bacterial Foraging Optimization and its application for training kernel extreme learning machine. Appl Soft Comput 86:105884

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang X et al (2019) Robust low-rank tensor recovery with rectification and alignment. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2019.2929043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen H et al (2019) A balanced whale optimization algorithm for constrained engineering design problems. Appl Math Model 71:45–59

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo J et al (2019) Multi-strategy boosted mutative whale-inspired optimization approaches. Appl Math Model 73:109–123

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu H et al (2020) Chaos-enhanced synchronized bat optimizer. Appl Math Model 77:1201–1215

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen H et al (2020) Efficient multi-population outpost fruit fly-driven optimizers: framework and advances in support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 142:500

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen H, Wang M, Zhao X (2020) A multi-strategy enhanced sine cosine algorithm for global optimization and constrained practical engineering problems. Appl Math Comput 369:124872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124872

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X et al (2020) Gaussian mutational chaotic fruit fly-built optimization and feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 141:112976

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta S, Deep K (2019) Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 165:374–406

    Google Scholar 

  24. Syed MA, Syed R (2019) Weighted Salp Swarm Algorithm and its applications towards optimal sensor deployment. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 10:50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228–249

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kannan S et al (2004) Application of particle swarm optimization technique and its variants to generation expansion planning problem. Electr Power Syst Res 70(3):203–210

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salimi H (2015) Stochastic Fractal Search: a powerful metaheuristic algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 75:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kitayama S, Arakawa M, Yamazaki K (2011) Differential evolution as the global optimization technique and its application to structural optimization. Appl Soft Comput 11(4):3792–3803

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mirjalili S et al (2017) Salp Swarm Algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a Sine Cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kiran MS (2017) Particle swarm optimization with a new update mechanism. Appl Soft Comput 60:670–678

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Hatamlou A (2015) Multi-Verse Optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 27(2):495–513

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mirjalili S (2015) The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2017) Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw 105:30–47

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang XS, Hossein Gandomi A (2012) Bat algorithm: a novel approach for global engineering optimization. Eng Comput 29(5):464–483

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tighzert L, Fonlupt C, Mendil B (2018) A set of new compact firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 40:92–115

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pan W-T (2012) A new fruit fly optimization algorithm: taking the financial distress model as an example. Knowl-Based Syst 26:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li S et al (2020) Slime mould algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yuan X et al (2014) On a novel multi-swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm and its application. Appl Math Comput 233:260–271

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu Y et al (2019) Enhanced Moth-flame optimizer with mutation strategy for global optimization. Inf Sci 492:181–203

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Abd Elaziz M, Oliva D, Xiong S (2017) An improved opposition-based sine cosine algorithm for global optimization. Expert Syst Appl 90:484–500

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kohli M, Arora S (2018) Chaotic grey wolf optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng 5(4):458–472

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tian X, Li J (2019) A novel improved fruit fly optimization algorithm for aerodynamic shape design optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 179:77–91

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hegazy AE, Makhlouf MA, El-Tawel GS (2018) Improved salp swarm algorithm for feature selection. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Singh N, Singh SB (2017) A novel hybrid GWO-SCA approach for optimization problems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(6):1586–1601

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chegini SN, Bagheri A, Najafi F (2018) PSOSCALF: a new hybrid PSO based on sine cosine algorithm and levy flight for solving optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 73:697–726

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mafarja MM, Mirjalili S (2017) Hybrid whale optimization algorithm with simulated annealing for feature selection. Neurocomputing 260:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods. Appl Soft Comput 66:208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Moayedi H, Rezaei A (2019) An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand. Neural Comput Appl 31(2):327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Applicability of a CPT-based neural network solution in predicting load-settlement responses of bored pile. Int J Geomech 18(6):06018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Qiao W, Moayedi H, Foong LK (2020) Nature-inspired hybrid techniques of IWO, DA, ES, GA, and ICA, validated through a k-fold validation process predicting monthly natural gas consumption. Energy and Buildings 217:110023

    Google Scholar 

  54. Qiao W, Bingfan L, Zhangyang K (2019) Differential scanning calorimetry and electrochemical tests for the analysis of delamination of 3PE coatings. Int J Electrochem Sci 7389–7400

  55. Faris H et al (2018) An efficient binary Salp swarm algorithm with crossover scheme for feature selection problems. Knowl-Based Syst 154:43–67

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen H et al (2019) An efficient double adaptive random spare reinforced whale optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 201:113018

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen H et al (2020) Efficient multi-population outpost fruit fly-driven optimizers: framework and advances in support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 142:112999

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chen H et al (2019) An opposition-based sine cosine approach with local search for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models. Energy Convers Manag 195:927–942

    Google Scholar 

  59. Abbassi A et al (2020) Parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models using enhanced exploratory salp chains-based approach. Energy 20:117333

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tang H et al (2020) Predicting green consumption behaviors of students using efficient firefly grey wolf-assisted k-nearest neighbor classifiers. IEEE Access 8:35546–35562

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang H et al (2020) Orthogonal Nelder-Mead moth flame method for parameters identification of photovoltaic modules. Energy Convers Manag 211:112764

    Google Scholar 

  62. Arora S, Anand P (2019) Binary butterfly optimization approaches for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 116:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mafarja M et al (2018) Binary dragonfly optimization for feature selection using time-varying transfer functions. Knowl-Based Syst 161:185–204

    Google Scholar 

  64. Baig MZ et al (2017) Differential evolution algorithm as a tool for optimal feature subset selection in motor imagery EEG. Expert Syst Appl 90:184–195

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gu S, Cheng R, Jin Y (2016) Feature selection for high-dimensional classification using a competitive swarm optimizer. Soft Comput 22(3):811–822

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rodrigues D et al (2014) A wrapper approach for feature selection based on Bat Algorithm and Optimum-Path Forest. Expert Syst Appl 41(5):2250–2258

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mafarja M et al (2019) Binary grasshopper optimisation algorithm approaches for feature selection problems. Expert Syst Appl 117:267–286

    Google Scholar 

  68. Arora S et al (2019) A new hybrid algorithm based on grey wolf optimization and crow search algorithm for unconstrained function optimization and feature selection. Ieee Access 7:26343–26361

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zorarpaci E, Ozel SA (2016) A hybrid approach of differential evolution and artificial bee colony for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 62:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shunmugapriya P, Kanmani S (2017) A hybrid algorithm using ant and bee colony optimization for feature selection and classification (AC-ABC hybrid). Swarm Evol Comput 36:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  71. Heidari AA et al (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ridha HM et al (2020) Boosted mutation-based Harris hawks optimizer for parameters identification of single-diode solar cell models. Energy Convers Manag 209:112660

    Google Scholar 

  73. Chen H et al (2020) Parameters identification of photovoltaic cells and modules using diversification-enriched Harris hawks optimization with chaotic driftse. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wei Y et al (2020) Predicting entrepreneurial intention of students: an extreme learning machine with gaussian barebone harris hawks optimizer. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen H et al (2020) Multi-population differential evolution-assisted Harris hawks optimization: framework and case studies. Future Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Abdel ASHE et al (2019) Harmonic overloading minimization of frequency-dependent components in harmonics polluted distribution systems using harris hawks optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 7:100824–100837

    Google Scholar 

  77. Amiri GN, Gao H, Demirel H (2019) Satellite image de-noising with harris hawks meta heuristic optimization algorithm and improved adaptive generalized gaussian distribution threshold function. IEEE Access 7:57459–57468

    Google Scholar 

  78. Qais MH, Hasanien HM, Alghuwainem S (2020) Parameters extraction of three-diode photovoltaic model using computation and Harris hawks optimization. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Rodríguez-Esparza E et al (2020) An efficient harris hawks-inspired image segmentation method. Expert Syst Appl 20:113428

    Google Scholar 

  80. Shehabeldeen TA et al (2019) Modeling of friction stir welding process using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system integrated with harris hawks optimizer. J Mater Res Technol 8(6):5882–5892

    Google Scholar 

  81. Moayedi H et al (2019) A novel Harris hawks’ optimization and k-fold cross-validation predicting slope stability. Eng Comput 20:19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00828-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Essa FA, Abd Elaziz M, Elsheikh AH (2020) An enhanced productivity prediction model of active solar still using artificial neural network and Harris hawks optimizer. Appl Thermal Eng 1:70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Houssein EH et al (2020) A novel hybrid Harris hawks optimization and support vector machines for drug design and discovery. Comput Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Moayedi H et al (2020) Herding Behaviors of grasshopper and Harris hawk for hybridizing the neural network in predicting the soil compression coefficient. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ridha HM et al (2020) Boosted mutation-based Harris hawks optimizer for parameters identification of single-diode solar cell models. Energy Convers Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen H et al (2020) Parameters identification of photovoltaic cells and modules using diversification-enriched Harris hawks optimization with chaotic drifts. J Clean Product. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Yousri D, Allam D, Eteiba MB (2020) Optimal photovoltaic array reconfiguration for alleviating the partial shading influence based on a modified harris hawks optimizer. Energy Conver Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Jia H et al (2019) Dynamic Harris hawks optimization with mutation mechanism for satellite image segmentation. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kamboj VK et al (2020) An intensify Harris hawks optimizer for numerical and engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ewees AA, Elaziz MA (2020) Performance analysis of Chaotic Multi-Verse Harris hawks optimization: a case study on solving engineering problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Abbassi A et al (2020) Parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models using enhanced exploratory salp chains-based approach. Energy 198:117333

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gupta S et al (2019) Harmonized salp chain-built optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00871-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Abbassi R et al (2019) An efficient salp swarm-inspired algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models. Energy Convers Manag 179:362–372

    Google Scholar 

  94. Qais MH, Hasanien HM, Alghuwainem S (2019) Enhanced salp swarm algorithm: application to variable speed wind generators. Eng Appl Artif Intell 80:82–96

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ibrahim RA et al (2018) Improved salp swarm algorithm based on particle swarm optimization for feature selection. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(8):3155–3169

    Google Scholar 

  96. Neggaz N et al (2020) Boosting salp swarm algorithm by sine cosine algorithm and disrupt operator for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Tubishat M et al (2020) Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm based on opposition based learning and novel local search algorithm for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Hussien AG, Hassanien AE, Houssein EH (2017) Swarming behaviour of salps algorithm for predicting chemical compound activities. In: 2017 eighth international conference on intelligent computing and information systems (ICICIS), pp 315–320

  99. El-Fergany AA (2018) Extracting optimal parameters of PEM fuel cells using Salp Swarm optimizer. Renew Energy 119:641–648

    Google Scholar 

  100. Asaithambi S, Rajappa M (2018) Swarm intelligence-based approach for optimal design of CMOS differential amplifier and comparator circuit using a hybrid salp swarm algorithm. Rev Sci Instrum 89(5):054702

    Google Scholar 

  101. Gao W, Wu H, Siddiqui MK, Baig AQ (2018) Study of biological networks using graph theory. Saudi J Biol Sci 25(6):1212–1219

    Google Scholar 

  102. Xu Z et al (2020) Orthogonally-designed adapted grasshopper optimization: a comprehensive analysis. Expert Syst Appl 150:113282

    Google Scholar 

  103. Gao W, Wang W, Dimitrov D, Wang Y (2018) Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating. Arab J Chem 11(6):793–801

    Google Scholar 

  104. Wei G, Guirao JLG, Basavanagoud B, Jianzhang Wu (2018) Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm. Inform Sci 467:35-58

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Gao W, Guirao JLG, Abdel-Aty M, Xi W (2019) An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs discrete & continuous dynamical systems-S. vol.12, no. 4&5, pp 877–886

  106. Jingqiao Z, Sanderson AC (2009) JADE: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(5):945–958

    Google Scholar 

  107. Qin AK, Huang VL, Suganthan PN (2009) Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(2):398–417

    Google Scholar 

  108. Brest J et al (2006) Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(6):646–657

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wang Y, Cai Z, Zhang Q (2011) Differential evolution with composite trial vector generation strategies and control parameters. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 15(1):55–66

    Google Scholar 

  110. Tanabe R, Fukunaga AS (2014) Improving the search performance of SHADE using linear population size reduction. IEEE Congress Evol Comput (CEC) 2014:1658–1665

    Google Scholar 

  111. Chen W-N et al (2013) Particle swarm optimization with an aging leader and challengers. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 17(2):241–258

    Google Scholar 

  112. Liang JJ et al (2006) Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(3):281–295

    Google Scholar 

  113. Zhao X et al (2016) An efficient and effective automatic recognition system for online recognition of foreign fibers in cotton. IEEE Access 4:8465–8475

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lynn N, Suganthan PN (2015) Heterogeneous comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization with enhanced exploration and exploitation. Swarm Evol Comput 24:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  115. Lynn N, Suganthan PN (2017) Ensemble particle swarm optimizer. Appl Soft Comput 55:533–548

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ratnaweera A, Halgamuge SK, Watson HC (2004) Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):240–255

    Google Scholar 

  117. Emary E, Zawbaa HM, Hassanien AE (2016) Binary grey wolf optimization approaches for feature selection. Neurocomputing 172:371–381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Huiling Chen and Chengye Li, these authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, Shaanxi, China

    Yanan Zhang & Renjing Liu

  2. Computer Information Network Center, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China

    Yanan Zhang

  3. Office of Educational Administration, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China

    Xin Wang

  4. College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China

    Huiling Chen

  5. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China

    Chengye Li

Authors
  1. Yanan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renjing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huiling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chengye Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huiling Chen or Chengye Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Liu, R., Wang, X. et al. Boosted binary Harris hawks optimizer and feature selection. Engineering with Computers 37, 3741–3770 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01028-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01028-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation