Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable design of reinforced concrete frames with non-prismatic beams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, sustainable design of reinforced concrete frames with non-prismatic beams is studied and relationship between optimal cost and optimal carbon dioxide emission in design of this type of frames is investigated. The objective functions are minimizing the CO2 emissions and construction cost, and the design variables are defined as the geometry of the cross sections and reinforcing bars of the beams and columns, as well as the tapered length ratio for the non-prismatic beams. The performance of five metaheuristic algorithms consisting of the particle swarm optimization, colliding bodies optimization, enhanced colliding bodies optimization, vibrating particles system and enhanced vibrating particles system is compared for solution of Example 1. The most competent algorithm is identified, and the remaining examples are optimized using the identified algorithm to minimize the cost and CO2 emissions. Numerical examples include reinforced concrete frames with prismatic beams, and frames with non-prismatic beams are optimally designed under equivalent static analysis to evaluate the objectives. Study of the results shows that compared to prismatic beams, in addition to achieving acceptable height in the floor of the structure, the use of non-prismatic beams in RC frames reduces the optimal economic costs and optimal CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaveh A (2017) Advances in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05549-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh A (2017) Applications of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in civil engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48012-1_17

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaveh A, Bakhshpoori T (2019) Metaheuristics: outlines, MATLAB codes and examples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04067-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2019) Discrete sizing of steel frames using adaptive dimensional search algorithm. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63:1062–1079. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.14746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazemzadeh Azad S, Bybordiani M, Kazemzadeh Azad S et al (2018) Simultaneous size and geometry optimization of steel trusses under dynamic excitations. Multidiscip. Optim, Struct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2039-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bybordiani M, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2019) Optimum design of steel braced frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction. Multidiscip. Optim, Struct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02260-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Fadaee MJ, Grierson DE (1998) Design optimization of 3D reinforced concrete structures having shear walls. Eng Comput 14:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akin A, Saka MP (2015) Harmony search algorithm based optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete plane frames subject to ACI 318-05 provisions. Comput Struct 147:79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Esfandiari MJ, Urgessa GS, Sheikholarefin S, Dehghan Manshadi SH (2017) Optimum design of 3D reinforced concrete frames using DMPSO algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 115:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaveh A, Zakian P (2014) Seismic design optimisation of RC moment frames and dual shear wall-frame structures VIA CSS algorithm. Asian J Civ Eng 15(3):435–465

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee C, Ahn J (2003) Flexural design of reinforced concrete frames by genetic algorithm. J Struct Eng 129(6):762–774. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(762)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gheyratmand C, Gholizadeh S, Vababzadeh B (2015) Optimization of RC frames by an improved artificial bee colony algorithm. Int J Optim Civ Eng 5(2):189–203

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mergos PE (2018) Seismic design of reinforced concrete frames for minimum embodied CO2 emissions. Energy Build 162:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Greening P, James J, Stephenson B, Mumovic D (2018) Investigating relationships between cost and CO2 emissions in reinforced concrete structures using a BIM-based design optimisation approach. Energy Build 166:330–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon YC, Kim KH, Lee SH, Yeo D (2018) Sustainable design for reinforced concrete columns through embodied energy and CO2 emission optimization. Energy Build 174:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaveh A, Ardalani S (2016) Cost and CO2 emission optimization of reinforced concrete frames using enhanced colliding bodies algorithm. Asian J Civ Eng 17(6):831–858

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaveh A, Izadifard RA, Mottaghi L (2020) Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. J Build Eng 28:101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh BK, Park JS, Choi SW, Park HS (2016) Design model for analysis of relationships among CO2 emissions, cost, and structural parameters in green building construction with composite columns. Energy Build 118:301–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park HS, Hwang JW, Oh BK (2018) Integrated analysis model for assessing CO2 emissions, seismic performance, and costs of buildings through performance-based optimal seismic design with sustainability. Energy Build 158:761–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phan DT, Lim JBP, Tanyimboh TT, Lawson RM, Xu X, Martin S, Sha W (2013) Effect of serviceability limits on optimal design of steel portal frame. J Constr Steel Res 86:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McKinstray R, Lim JBP, Tanyimboh TT, Phan DT, Sha W (2016) Comparison of optimal designs of steel portal frames including topological asymmetry considering rolled, fabricated and tapered sections. Eng Struct 111:505–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaveh A, Kabir MZ, Bohlool M (2019) Optimal design of multi-span pitched roof frames with tapered members. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.13107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaveh A, Kabir MZ, Bohlool M (2019) Optimum design of three-dimensional steel frames with prismatic and non-prismatic elements. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00746-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yavari MS, Du G, Pacoste C, Karoumi R (2017) Environmental impact optimization of reinforced concrete slab frame bridges. J Civ Eng Archit 11:313–324. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2017.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2014) Colliding bodies optimization: a novel meta-heuristic method. Comput Struct 139:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2014) Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables. Adv Eng Softw 77:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2017) A new meta-heuristic algorithm: vibrating particles system. Sci Iran 24(2):551–566. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaveh A, Hoseini Vaez SR, Hosseini P (2019) Enhanced vibrating particles system algorithm for damage identification of truss structures. Sci Iran 26(1):246–256. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eberhart RC, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.1995.494215

  30. PEERS, OpenSEES (2012) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  31. ACI 318-08 (2008) A. C. Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary

  32. MATLAB. Math Works Inc (2016) The language of technical computing

  33. Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2013) Upper bound strategy for metaheuristic based design optimization of steel frames. Adv Eng Softw 57:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazemzadeh Azad S (2017) Seeding the initial population with feasible solutions in metaheuristic optimization of steel trusses. Eng Optim 50:89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1284833

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kaveh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaveh, A., Mottaghi, L. & Izadifard, R.A. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete frames with non-prismatic beams. Engineering with Computers 38, 69–86 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01045-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01045-4

Keywords

Navigation