Abstract
Ion source operation and control is a challenging task, and the manual search of the optimized input parameter by the operator becomes a time consuming and cumbersome process. HELicon Experiment for Negative Ion Source (HELEN-I) with single driver developed at the Institute for Plasma Research (IPR) for the production negative hydrogen ion involves a multitude of interacting systems (such as Radio Frequency (RF) power, gas feed pressure, magnetic fields). This paper presents an Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven multiple-input and multiple-output model for HELEN-I to get optimized values of ion saturation current (mA) and high plasma density of order 1018/m3. The developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based model predicts the outputs of the HELEN-I and is further utilizes a heuristic global optimization Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm to select optimal source parameters to predict the desired outputs without conducting real-time experiments. The experimental studies further validate the results obtained by the proposed approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pandey A, Bandyopadhyay M, Sudhir D, Chakraborty A (2017) Performance evaluation of a permanent ring magnet based helicon plasma source for negative ion source research. Rev Sci Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994058
Boswell RW (1984) Very efficient plasma generation by whistler waves near the lower hybrid frequency. Plasma Phys Control Fusion 26:1147–1162. https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/26/10/001
Pandey A, Sudhir D, Bandyopadhyay M, Chakraborty A (2016) Conceptual design of a permanent ring magnet based helicon plasma source module intended to be used in a large size fusion grade ion source. Fusion Eng Des 103:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.11.025
Edelen AL, Biedron SG, Chase BE, Edstrom D, Milton SV, Stabile P (2016) Neural networks for modeling and control of particle accelerators. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 63(2):878–897. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2016.2543203
Scheinker A, Edelen A, Bohler D, Emma C, Lutman A (2018) Demonstration of model-independent control of the longitudinal phase space of electron beams in the linac-coherent light source with femtosecond resolution. Phys Rev Lett 121:44801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.044801
Huang X, Corbett J, Safranek J, Wu J (2013) An algorithm for online optimization of accelerators. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers Detect Assoc Equip 726:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.046
Brown SK, Mead WC, Bowling PS, Jones RD, Barnes CW (1994) Optimization and control of a small angle ion source using an adaptive neural network controller (invited). Rev Sci Instrum 65:1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144978
Kong YB, Hur MG, Lee EJ, Park JH, Park YD, Yang SD (2016) Predictive ion source control using artificial neural network for RFT-30 cyclotron. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers Detect Assoc Equip 806:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.095
Scheinker DBA, Rees D, Garnett B, Milton S, Edelen AL (2018) Applying artificial intelligence to accelerators. IPAC 2018 Ninth Int Part Accel Conf. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACOW-IPAC2016-TUOBB02
Pandey A, Mukherjee D, Borah D, Bandyopadhyay M, Tyagi H, Yadav R, Chakraborty A (2019) Characterization of hydrogen plasma in a permanent ring magnet based helicon plasma source for negative ion source research. Plasma Phys Control Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab0f09
Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I, Bruna J, Erhan D, Goodfellow I, Fergus R (2014) Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations ICLR 2014 - Conference Track Proceedings. Banff, pp 1–10
Shanmuganathan S, Samarasinghe S (2016) Artificial neural network modelling. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/12/004
R. Murray-Smith, D. Neumerkel, D. Sbarbaro-Hofer (1992) Neural networks for modelling and control of a nonlinear dynamic system. IEEE Int Symp Intell Control—Proc https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.1992.225125
Fernandez FG, Santos ISL, Redondo FL, Izquierdo S, Vega-carrillo HR, Cervantes-viramontes JM, Martín V, Caocci G, Radi A, Luis J, Rosa G, Mareš J (2013) Artificial neural networks – architectures and applications. In Tech. https://doi.org/10.5772/3409
Hussain MA (1999) Review of the applications of neural networks in chemical process control—simulation and online implementation. Artif Intell Eng 13:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-1810(98)00011-9
Shen YF, Pokharel R, Nizolek TJ, Kumar A, Lookman T (2019) Convolutional neural network-based method for real-time orientation indexing of measured electron backscatter diffraction patterns. Acta Mater 170:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.026
Pieck M (2009) Artificial intelligence research in particle accelerator control systems for beam line tuning. In: Proceedings 24th LINAC 2008, Victoria, British Columbia, pp 314–316
Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Demuth H, Beale M (2005) MATLAB neural networks toolbox v4 user's guide. Mathworks Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2005.10.002
Wilamowski B, Irwin J (eds) (2011) The industrial electronics handbook - five volume set. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/NOE1439802892
Wang W, Pedretti G, Milo V, Carboni R, Calderoni A, Ramaswamy N, Spinelli AS, Ielmini D (2019) Computing of temporal information in spiking neural networks with ReRAM synapses. Faraday Discuss 213:453–469. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fd00097b
Abdi H, Valentin D, Edelman B, O'Toole AJ (1996) A Widrow-Hoff learning rule for a generalization of the linear auto-associator. J Math Psychol 40:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1996.0017
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation (No. ICS-8506). Calif Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst Cogn Sci 1:318–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50035-2
Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1996) Brief Papers. Brain Cogn 32:273–344. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1996.0066
Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6:525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5
Awolusi TF, Oke OL, Akinkurolere OO, Sojobi AO, Aluko OG (2019) Performance comparison of neural network training algorithms in the modeling properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Heliyon 5:e01115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01115
Mukherjee I, Routroy S (2012) Comparing the performance of neural networks developed by using Levenberg–Marquardt and Quasi-Newton with the gradient descent algorithm for modelling a multiple response grinding process. Expert Syst Appl 39:2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.087
Andrei N (2007) Scaled conjugate gradient algorithms for unconstrained optimization. Comput Optim Appl 38:401–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9055-7
Lourakis MIA (2005) A brief description of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm implemened by levmar. Matrix 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.10.001
Botchkarev A (2018) Evaluating performance of regression machine learning models using multiple error metrics in azure machine learning studio. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3177507
Hagan MT, Demuth HB, De Jesús O (2002) An introduction to the use of neural networks in control systems. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 12:959–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.727
Ian G, Yoshua B, Aaron C (2016) Deep learning. https://www.deeplearningbook.org/front_matter.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2020
Kang KU, An DH, Chang HS, Chai JS (2008) Performance optimization of H—multicusp ion source for KIRAMS-30 cyclotron. Rev Sci Instrum 79:2006–2009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2819336
Abdmouleh Z, Gastli A, Ben-Brahim L, Haouari M, Al-Emadi NA (2017) Review of optimization techniques applied for the integration of distributed generation from renewable energy sources. Renew Energy 113:266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.087
Bai Q (2016) Analysis of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Comput Inf Sci 3:180–184
Chunkai Zhang, Huihe Shao, Yu Li (2002) Particle swarm optimisation for evolving artificial neural network, pp 2487–2490. 1https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2000.88436610.1109/icsmc.2000.884366
P.N. Suganthan (1999) Particle swarm optimiser with neighbourhood operator. In: Proc 1999 Congr Evol Comput CEC 1999. Vol 3, pp 1958–1962 10.1109/CEC.1999.785514
Ribeiro MI (2004) Gaussian probability density functions: properties and error characterization. Institute for systems and robotics, Instituto superior tcnico. [Online]. Available: http://hans.fugal.net/comps/papers/ribeiro_2004.pdf Accessed 08 May 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shukla, V., Bandyopadhyay, M., Pandya, V. et al. Artificial neural network based predictive negative hydrogen ion helicon plasma source for fusion grade large sized ion source. Engineering with Computers 38, 347–364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01060-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01060-5