Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of interfacial/interphase conductivity on the electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes nanocomposites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the effective length and concentration of carbon nanotubes (CNT) in polymer CNT nanocomposites (PCNT) are formulated by conductivity transferring between nanoparticles and polymer matrix as well as interfacial conductivity. The effective terms and interphase thickness are applied to suggest the percolation threshold of CNT and the volume fraction of networked CNT in PCNT. In addition, a simple model is developed for conductivity of PCNT by the mentioned parameters and the tunneling distance between adjacent CNT. The predictions of conductivity are compared to the experimental results and the significances of all parameters on the conductivity are justified to validate the advanced model. The predictions of developed model show fine agreement with the experimental data. High conductivity transportation and large CNT can improve the conductivity of PCNT. Additionally, the optimized levels of conductivity are obtained by thick interphase and high interfacial conductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rostami A, Moosavi MI (2019) High-performance thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites induced by hybrid application of functionalized graphene and carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci 137:48520

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ebrahimi F, Farazmandnia N, Kokaba MR, Mahesh V (2019) Vibration analysis of porous magneto-electro-elastically actuated carbon nanotube-reinforced composite sandwich plate based on a refined plate theory. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00864-4

  3. Hajmohammad MH, Nouri AH, Zarei MS, Kolahchi R (2019) A new numerical approach and visco-refined zigzag theory for blast analysis of auxetic honeycomb plates integrated by multiphase nanocomposite facesheets in hygrothermal environment. Eng Comput 35:1141–1157

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oskouie MF, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Ansari R (2019) A new numerical approach for low velocity impact response of multiscale-reinforced nanocomposite plates. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00851-9

  5. Ibrahim NI, Wasfi AS (2019) A comparative study of polyaniline/MWCNT with polyaniline/SWCNT nanocomposite films synthesized by microwave plasma polymerization. Synth Met 250:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mottet L, Le Cornec D, Noël J-M, Kanoufi F, Delord B, Poulin P, Bibette J, Bremond N (2018) A conductive hydrogel based on alginate and carbon nanotubes for probing microbial electroactivity. Soft Matter 14:1434–1441

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karimiasl M, Ebrahimi F, Mahesh V (2019) Postbuckling analysis of piezoelectric multiscale sandwich composite doubly curved porous shallow shells via Homotopy Perturbation Method. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00841-x

  8. Ghassabi M, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R (2019) Investigation of state vector computational solution on modeling of wave propagation through functionally graded nanocomposite doubly curved thick structures. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00773-6

  9. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Ansari R, Mahmoodi MJ (2019) Thermo-mechanical properties of shape memory polymer nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Mech Mater 129:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Mahmoodi M, Jamali J, Ansari R (2019) A new micromechanical method for the analysis of thermal conductivities of unidirectional fiber/CNT-reinforced polymer hybrid nanocomposites. Compos B Eng 175:107137

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park SJ (2019) Simple model for hydrolytic degradation of poly (lactic acid)/poly (ethylene oxide)/carbon nanotubes nanobiosensor in neutral phosphate-buffered saline solution. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 107:2706–2717

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) Prediction of loss factor (tan δ) for polymer nanocomposites as a function of yield tress, relaxation time and the width of transition region between Newtonian and power-law behaviors. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 96:136–143

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of piezoelectric-bonded FG-CNTR composite structures using an improved FSDT theory. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00891-1

  14. Ebrahimi F, Habibi M, Safarpour H (2019) On modeling of wave propagation in a thermally affected GNP-reinforced imperfect nanocomposite shell. Eng Comput 35:1375–1389

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ebrahimi F, Mahesh V (2019) Chaotic dynamics and forced harmonic vibration analysis of magneto-electro-viscoelastic multiscale composite nanobeam. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00865-3

  16. Hasanzadeh M, Ansari R, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M (2019) Evaluation of effective properties of piezoelectric hybrid composites containing carbon nanotubes. Mech Mater 129:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Ansari R (2019) Thermal conductivity of shape memory polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes: a micromechanical approach. Compos B Eng 162:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rostami A, Eskandari F, Masoomi M, Nowrouzi M (2019) Evolution of microstructure and physical properties of PMMA/MWCNTs nanocomposites upon the addition of organoclay. J Oil Gas Petrochem Technol 6:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rostami A, Vahdati M, Alimoradi Y, Karimi M, Nazockdast H (2018) Rheology provides insight into flow induced nano-structural breakdown and its recovery effect on crystallization of single and hybrid carbon nanofiller filled poly (lactic acid). Polymer 134:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rostami A, Vahdati M, Nazockdast H (2018) Unraveling the localization behavior of MWCNTs in binary polymer blends using thermodynamics and viscoelastic approaches. Polym Compos 39:2356–2367

    Google Scholar 

  21. Naghib SM (2019) Two dimensional functionalized methacrylated graphene oxide nanosheets as simple and inexpensive electrodes for biosensing applications. Micro Nano Lett 14:462–465

    Google Scholar 

  22. Askari E, Naghib SM, Seyfoori A, Maleki A, Rahmanian M (2019) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis and in vitro biological assessments of a novel herceptin-stabilized graphene using three dimensional cell spheroid. Ultrasonics Sonochem 58:104615

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mamaghani KR, Naghib SM, Zahedi A, Mozafari M (2018) Synthesis and microstructural characterization of GelMa/PEGDA hybrid hydrogel containing graphene oxide for biomedical purposes. Mater Today Proc 5:15635–15644

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naghib SM (2016) Fabrication of nafion/silver nanoparticles/reduced graphene nanosheets/glucose oxidase nanobiocomposite for electrochemical glucose biosensing. Anal Bioanal Electrochem 8:453–465

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bharadiya PS, Singh MK, Mishra S (2019) Influence of graphene oxide on mechanical and hydrophilic properties of epoxy/banana fiber composites. JOM 71:838–843

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alhusaiki-Alghamdi H (2019) Improve spectroscopic structural and AC electrical conductivity of PC/PEO blend using graphene. Res Phys 12:793–798

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qiao Y, Xiao J, Jia Q, Lu L, Fan H (2019) Preparation and microwave absorption properties of ZnFe2O4/polyaniline/graphene oxide composite. Res Phys 13:102221

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mamaghani KR, Naghib SM, Zahedi A, Rahmanian M, Mozafari M (2018) GelMa/PEGDA containing graphene oxide as an IPN hydrogel with superior mechanical performance. Mater Today Proc 5:15790–15799

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mamaghani KR, Naghib SM, Zahedi A, Kalkhoran AHZ, Rahmanian M (2018) Fast synthesis of methacrylated graphene oxide: a graphene-functionalised nanostructure. Micro Nano Lett 13:195–197

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gooneh-Farahani S, Naghib SM, Naimi-Jamal MR (2019) A critical comparison study on the pH-sensitive nanocomposites based on graphene-grafted chitosan for cancer theragnosis. Multidiscip Cancer Investig 3:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2019) Modeling the roles of carbon nanotubes and interphase dimensions in the conductivity of nanocomposites. Res Phys 15:102562

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2019) A developed equation for electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes (CNT) nanocomposites based on Halpin-Tsai model. Res Phys 14:102406

    Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Saleh MH (2015) Influence of conductive network structure on the EMI shielding and electrical percolation of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Synth Met 205:78–84

    Google Scholar 

  34. Du F, Scogna RC, Zhou W, Brand S, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2004) Nanotube networks in polymer nanocomposites: rheology and electrical conductivity. Macromolecules 37:9048–9055

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li C, Thostenson ET, Chou T-W (2007) Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Appl Phys Lett 91:223114

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) A multistep methodology for effective conductivity of carbon nanotubes reinforced nanocomposites. J Alloy Compd 793:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rostami A, Masoomi M, Fayazi MJ, Vahdati M (2015) Role of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on rheological, thermal and electrical properties of PC/ABS blend. RSC Adv 5:32880–32890

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maiti S, Suin S, Shrivastava NK, Khatua B (2013) Low percolation threshold in polycarbonate/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites through melt blending with poly (butylene terephthalate). J Appl Polym Sci 130:543–553

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) Development of a conventional model to predict the electrical conductivity of polymer/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites by interphase, waviness and contact effects. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 100:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  40. Takeda T, Shindo Y, Kuronuma Y, Narita F (2011) Modeling and characterization of the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based polymer composites. Polymer 52:3852–3856

    Google Scholar 

  41. Feng C, Jiang L (2013) Micromechanics modeling of the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube (CNT)-polymer nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 47:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  42. Haghgoo M, Ansari R, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Nankali M (2019) Analytical formulation for electrical conductivity and percolation threshold of epoxy multiscale nanocomposites reinforced with chopped carbon fibers and wavy carbon nanotubes considering tunneling resistivity. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 126:105616

    Google Scholar 

  43. Haghgoo M, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Ansari R (2019) A comprehensive evaluation of piezoresistive response and percolation behavior of multiscale polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 130:105735

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haghgoo M, Ansari R, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M (2019) Prediction of electrical conductivity of carbon fiber-carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer hybrid composites. Compos Part B Eng 167:728–735

    Google Scholar 

  45. Taherian R (2016) Experimental and analytical model for the electrical conductivity of polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 123:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zare Y, Garmabi H, Rhee KY (2018) Prediction of complex modulus in phase-separated poly (lactic acid)/poly (ethylene oxide)/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Polym Test 66:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) Effects of interphase regions and filler networks on the viscosity of PLA/PEO/carbon nanotubes biosensor. Polym Compos 40:4135–4141

    Google Scholar 

  48. Peng W, Rhim S, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) Effect of “Z” factor for strength of interphase layers on the tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites. Polym Compos 40:1117–1122

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) Tensile modulus prediction of carbon nanotubes-reinforced nanocomposites by a combined model for dispersion and networking of nanoparticles. J Mater Res Technol 9:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Mahmoodi MJ, Ansari R (2019) Creep performance of CNT polymer nanocomposites-An emphasis on viscoelastic interphase and CNT agglomeration. Compos B Eng 168:274–281

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) A multistep methodology for calculation of the tensile modulus in polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites above the percolation threshold based on the modified rule of mixtures. RSC Adv 8:30986–30993

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jamalzadeh N, Heidary S, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) A multistep methodology based on developed Takayanagi, Paul and Ouali models for tensile modulus of polymer/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites above percolation threshold assuming the contribution of interphase regions. Polym Test 69:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) Study on the effects of the interphase region on the network properties in polymer carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polymers 12:182

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou Z, Sarafbidabad M, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) Prediction of storage modulus in solid-like poly (lactic acid)/poly (ethylene oxide)/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites assuming the contributions of nanoparticles and interphase regions in the networks. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 86:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chen S, Sarafbidabad M, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) Estimation of the tensile modulus of polymer carbon nanotube nanocomposites containing filler networks and interphase regions by development of the Kolarik model. RSC Adv 8:23825–23834

    Google Scholar 

  56. Berhan L, Sastry A (2007) Modeling percolation in high-aspect-ratio fiber systems. I. Soft-core versus hard-core models. Phys Rev E 75:041120

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lazzeri A, Phuong VT (2014) Dependence of the Pukánszky’s interaction parameter B on the interface shear strength (IFSS) of nanofiller-and short fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 93:106–113

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shia D, Hui C, Burnside S, Giannelis E (1998) An interface model for the prediction of Young’s modulus of layered silicate-elastomer nanocomposites. Polym Compos 19:608–617

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rafiee R (2013) Influence of carbon nanotube waviness on the stiffness reduction of CNT/polymer composites. Compos Struct 97:304–309

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li J, Ma PC, Chow WS, To CK, Tang BZ, Kim JK (2007) Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv Func Mater 17:3207–3215

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rittigstein P, Torkelson JM (2006) Polymer–nanoparticle interfacial interactions in polymer nanocomposites: confinement effects on glass transition temperature and suppression of physical aging. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 44:2935–2943

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) The effective conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes (CNT) nanocomposites. J Phys Chem Solids 131:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  63. Thongruang W, Spontak RJ, Balik CM (2002) Correlated electrical conductivity and mechanical property analysis of high-density polyethylene filled with graphite and carbon fiber. Polymer 43:2279–2286

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) A simulation work for the influences of aggregation/agglomeration of clay layers on the tensile properties of nanocomposites. JOM 71:3989–3995

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mamunya Y, Boudenne A, Lebovka N, Ibos L, Candau Y, Lisunova M (2008) Electrical and thermophysical behaviour of PVC-MWCNT nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 68:1981–1988

    Google Scholar 

  66. Logakis E, Pissis P, Pospiech D, Korwitz A, Krause B, Reuter U, Pötschke P (2010) Low electrical percolation threshold in poly (ethylene terephthalate)/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 46:928–936

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mai F, Habibi Y, Raquez J-M, Dubois P, Feller J-F, Peijs T, Bilotti E (2013) Poly (lactic acid)/carbon nanotube nanocomposites with integrated degradation sensing. Polymer 54:6818–6823

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kim YJ, Shin TS, Do Choi H, Kwon JH, Chung Y-C, Yoon HG (2005) Electrical conductivity of chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 43:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  69. Baxter SC, Robinson CT (2011) Pseudo-percolation: critical volume fractions and mechanical percolation in polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 71:1273–1279

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) Calculation of the electrical conductivity of polymer nanocomposites assuming the interphase layer surrounding carbon nanotubes. Polymers 12:404

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) Simulation of percolation threshold, tunneling distance, and conductivity for carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced nanocomposites assuming effective CNT concentration. Polymers 12:114

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) Significances of interphase conductivity and tunneling resistance on the conductivity of carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Polym Compos 41:748–756

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong Yop Rhee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zare, Y., Rhee, K.Y. Effect of interfacial/interphase conductivity on the electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Engineering with Computers 38, 315–324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01062-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01062-3

Keywords

Navigation