Skip to main content
Log in

Winning Ways of Weighted Poset Games

  • Published:
Graphs and Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the weighted poset game, which is defined as an extension of the poset (partially ordered set) game by adding a weight on every element of the poset. Each player has their own non-negative number of lives, and loses as many lives as the sum of the element weights they took. The player whose lives become negative first is the loser. We consider winning ways of this problem. First, for the problem with {0, 1}-weights, we find that (1) if the number of lives are different, then the player who has the large number of lives is the winner, (2) if the number of lives are the same and all maximal elements have positive weights, then the second player is a winner, and (3) otherwise, the game is reduced to an (unweighted) poset game. Next, for general weights, we consider the case where the partial order is a total order, and derive a polynomial-time algorithm for calculating who is the winner and the winning way for the winner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlekamp, E.R., Conway, J.H., Guy, R.K.: Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays. Academic Press, NewYork (1982)

  • Bouton, C., Nim, A.: Game with a Complete Mathematical Theory. Ann. Math. 3, 35–39 (1902)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, A.E.: Chomp. Online document, http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/games/chomp. html (2003)

  • Byrnes, S.: Poset game periodicity. Integers: Electron. J. Comb. Number Theory 3, G3 (2003)

  • Conway, J.H., Sloane, N.J.A.: Lexicographic codes: error correcting codes from game theory. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-32, 337–348 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuber, W., Thomasse, S.: Grundy sets of partial orders. Diskrete Strukturen Math. 96, 123 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, S., Shurman, J.: Transfinite chomp. In: Nowakowski, R.J. (ed.) More Games of No Chance pp. 183–212. Cambridge University Press, London (2002)

  • Muller, M., Gasser, R.: Experiments in computer go endgames. In: Nowakowski, R.J. (ed.) Games of No Chance, p. 273. Cambridge University Press, London (1996)

  • Sun, X.: The Sprague–Grundy function for Chomp. Online document, http://www.math. tamu.edu/~xsun/chomp/chomp.htm (2003)

  • Sun, X.: Improvements on Chomp. INTEGERS: Electron. J. Comb. Number Theory 2, G1 (2002)

  • Ulehla, J.: A complete analysis of Von Neumann’s Hackendot. Internat. J. Game Theory 9, 107–113 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilberger, D.: Chomp, Recurrences, and Chaos(?). J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 10(13–15), 1281–1293 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilberger, D.: Three-Rowed CHOMP. Adv. Appl. Math. 26(2), 168–179 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiro Ito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, H., Nakamura, G. & Takata, S. Winning Ways of Weighted Poset Games. Graphs and Combinatorics 23 (Suppl 1), 291–306 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-007-0710-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-007-0710-7

Keywords

Navigation