Skip to main content
Log in

A model of force and impedance in human arm movements

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper describes a simple computational model of joint torque and impedance in human arm movements that can be used to simulate three-dimensional movements of the (redundant) arm or leg and to design the control of robots and human-machine interfaces. This model, based on recent physiological findings, assumes that (1) the central nervous system learns the force and impedance to perform a task successfully in a given stable or unstable dynamic environment and (2) stiffness is linearly related to the magnitude of the joint torque and increased to compensate for environment instability. Comparison with existing data shows that this simple model is able to predict impedance geometry well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW (1992) Time-varying of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88(2): 433–442

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett DJ (1993) Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 95(3): 488–498

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bicchi A, Rizzini SL, Tonietti G (2001) Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference of intelligent robots and systems, pp 1864–1869

  4. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (1999) Measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements. In: Proceedings of ASME symposium on haptic interfaces and virtual environments for teleoperator systems, pp 421–428

  5. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Yoshioka T, Milner TE, Kawato M (2000) A method for measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements. J Biomech 33(12): 1705–1709

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (2001) The central nervous system skillfully stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446–449

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burdet E, Franklin DW, Osu R, Tee KP, Kawato M, Milner TE (2004) How are internal models of unstable tasks formed? In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on engineering in medicine and biology

  8. Colgate JE and Hogan N (1988) Robust control of dynamically interacting systems. Int J Control 48: 65–88

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conditt MA, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1997) The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol 78(1): 554–560

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Wit CC, Siciliano B, Bastin G (1996) Theory of robot control. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  11. Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The co-ordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688–1703

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flash T, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1990) Human arm stiffness characteristics during the maintenance of posture. Exp Brain Res 82(2): 315–326

    Google Scholar 

  13. Franklin DW, Milner TE (2003a) Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads. Exp Brain Res 152(2): 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franklin DW, Burdet E, Osu R, Kawato M, Milner TE (2003b) Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics. Exp Brain Res 151: 145–157

    Google Scholar 

  15. Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner TE (2003c) Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90: 3270–3282

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomi H, Kawato M (1997) Human arm stiffness and equilibrium point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern 76(3): 163–171

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gomi H, Osu R (1998) Task-dependent viscoelasticity of human multijoint arm and its spatial characteristics for interaction with environments. J Neurosci 18: 8965–8978

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajecotry planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718–727

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lackner JR, Dizio P (1994) Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299–313

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milner TE (1993) Dependence of elbow viscoelastic behaviour on speed and loading in voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 93(1): 177–180

    Google Scholar 

  21. Milner TE, Cloutier C (1993) Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement. Exp Brain Res 94: 522–532

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Hogan N, Bizzi E (1985) Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. J Neurosci 5(10): 2732–2743

    Google Scholar 

  23. Osu R, Burdet E, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (2003) Different mechanisms involved in adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics. J Neurophysiol 90: 3255–3269

    Google Scholar 

  24. Perreault EJ, Kirsch RF, Crago PE (2001) Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness. Exp Brain Res 141(3): 312–323

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perreault EJ, Kirsch RF, Crago PE (2002) Voluntary control of static endpoint stiffness during force regulation tasks. J Neurophysiol 87(6): 2808–2816

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rancourt D, Hogan N (2001) Dynamics of pushing. J Mot Behav 33(4): 351–362

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47: 415–451

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of motor tasks. J Neurosci 14(5): 3208–3224

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH (1997) Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 277: 821–825

    Google Scholar 

  30. Slifkin AB, Newell KM (1999) Noise, information transmission, and force variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(3): 837–851

    Google Scholar 

  31. Surgical robots (2004) http://www.computermotion.com/ productsandsolutions/products/zeus/index. cfm;http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/da-vinci.html

  32. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (1999) Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements. J Neurosci 19(19): 8573–8588

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tsuji T, Morasso PG, Goto K, Ito K (1995) Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture. Biol Cyber 72(6): 475–485

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang H, Burdet E, Hutmacher DW, Poo AN, Bellouard Y, Clavel R, Sidler T (2002) Robotic micro-assembly of scaffold/cell constructs with a shape memory alloy gripper. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1483–1488

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Burdet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tee, K., Burdet, E., Chew, C. et al. A model of force and impedance in human arm movements. Biol. Cybern. 90, 368–375 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0484-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0484-4

Keywords

Navigation