Abstract.
It is well known that the human postural control system responds to motion of the visual scene, but the implicit assumptions it makes about the visual environment and what quantities, if any, it estimates about the visual environment are unknown. This study compares the behavior of four models of the human postural control system to experimental data. Three include internal models that estimate the state of the visual environment, implicitly assuming its dynamics to be that of a linear stochastic process (respectively, a random walk, a general first-order process, and a general second-order process). In each case, all of the coefficients that describe the process are estimated by an adaptive scheme based on maximum likelihood. The fourth model does not estimate the state of the visual environment. It adjusts sensory weights to minimize the mean square of the control signal without making any specific assumptions about the dynamic properties of the environmental motion.
We find that both having an internal model of the visual environment and its type make a significant difference in how the postural system responds to motion of the visual scene. Notably, the second-order process model outperforms the human postural system in its response to sinusoidal stimulation. Specifically, the second-order process model can correctly identify the frequency of the stimulus and completely compensate so that the motion of the visual scene has no effect on sway. In this case the postural control system extracts the same information from the visual modality as it does when the visual scene is stationary. The fourth model that does not simulate the motion of the visual environment is the only one that reproduces the experimentally observed result that, across different frequencies of sinusoidal stimulation, the gain with respect to the stimulus drops as the amplitude of the stimulus increases but the phase remains roughly constant. Our results suggest that the human postural control system does not estimate the state of the visual environment to respond to sinusoidal stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L Arnold (1974) Stochastic differential equations: theory and applications Wiley New York
AV Balakrishnan (1973) Stochastic differential systems: I. Filtering and control Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
T Brandt J Dichgans E Koenig (1973) ArticleTitleDifferential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception Exp Brain Res 16 476–491
T Brandt ER Wist J Dichgans (1975) ArticleTitleForeground and background in dynamic spatial orientation Percept Psychophys 17 497–503
AE Bryson YC Ho (1975) Applied optimal control Hemisphere Washington, DC
FB Horak JM Macpherson (1996) Postural orientation and equilibrium J Shepard L Rowell (Eds) Handbook of physiology Oxford University Press New York 255–292
JJ Jeka T Kiemel R Creath F Horak R Peterka (2004) ArticleTitleControlling human upright stance: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration J Neurophysiol 92 2368–2379
T Kiemel KS Oie JJ Jeka (2002) ArticleTitleMultisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway Biol Cybern 87 262–277 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00422-002-0333-2 Occurrence Handle12386742
ID Loram M Lakie (2002) ArticleTitleDirect measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability J Physiol 545 1041–1053 Occurrence Handle10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025049
PG Morasso V Sanguineti (2002) ArticleTitleAnkle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing J Neurophysiol 88 2157–2162
PG Morasso M Schieppati (1999) ArticleTitleCan muscle stiffness alone stabilize upright standing? J Neurophysiol 83 1622–1626
KA Myers BD Tapley (1976) ArticleTitleAdaptive sequential estimation with unknown noise statistics IEEE Trans Automat Control 22 520–523
KS Oie T Kiemel JJ Jeka (2002) ArticleTitleMultisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture Cogn Brain Res 14 164–167
RJ Peterka (2000) ArticleTitlePostural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis Biol Cybern 82 335–343 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004220050587 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3mtFaisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10804065
RJ Peterka (2002) ArticleTitleSensorimotor integration in human postural control J Neurophysiol 88 1097–1118
RJ Peterka MS Benolken (1995) ArticleTitleRole of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway Exp Brain Res 105 101–110 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00242186 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD287ktVQ%3D Occurrence Handle7589307
WH Press SA Teukolsky WT Vetterlin BP Flannery (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
Ravaioli E, Oie KS, Kiemel T, Chiari L, Jeka, JJ (2004) Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation. Exp Brain Res, E-Pub, 9 October 2004
A Shumway-Cook MH Woollacott (2001) Motor control: theory and practical applications Lippincott Philadelphia
N Teasdale GE Stelmach A Breunig (1991) ArticleTitlePostural sway characteristics of the elderly under normal and altered visual and support surface conditions J Gerontol 46 B238–B244 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2czjt10%3D Occurrence Handle1940075
H Kooij ParticleVan der R Jacobs B Koopman H Grootenboer (1999) ArticleTitleA multisensory integration model of human stance control Biol Cybern 80 299–308 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004220050527 Occurrence Handle10365423
H Kooij ParticleVan der R Jacobs B Koopman F Helm ParticleVan der (2001) ArticleTitleAn adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control Biol Cybern 84 103–115 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004220000196 Occurrence Handle11205347
DA Winter A Patla F Prince M Ishac K Gielo-Perczak (1998) ArticleTitleStiffness control of balance in quiet standing J Neurophysiol 80 1211–1221 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvislSlsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9744933
L Wolfson R Whipple P Amerman J Kaplan A Kleinberg (1985) ArticleTitleGait and balance in the elderly Clin Geriatr Med 1 649–659 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC287ivFQ%3D Occurrence Handle3913514
DM Wolpert Z Ghahramani MI Jordan (1995) ArticleTitleAn internal model for sensorimotor integration Science 269 1880–1882 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXotlKqtbw%3D Occurrence Handle7569931
MH Woollacott A Shumway-Cook L Nashner (1986) ArticleTitleAging and postural control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination Int J Aging Hum Dev 23 97–114 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC28vltlA%3D Occurrence Handle3557634
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carver, S., Kiemel, T., van der Kooij, H. et al. Comparing internal models of the dynamics of the visual environment. Biol Cybern 92, 147–163 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0535-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0535-x