Abstract
We studied the relationship between perceptual switching in the Necker cube and long-distance transient phase synchronization in EEG. Transient periods of response related synchrony between parietal and frontal areas were observed. They start 800–600, ms prior to the switch response and occur in pairs. Four types of pairs could be distinguished, two of which are accompanied by transient alpha band activity in the occipital area. The results indicate that perceptual switching processes involve parietal and frontal areas; these are the ones that are normally associated with various cognitive processes. Sensory information in the visual areas is involved in some, but not in all, of switching processes. The intrinsic variability, as well as the participating areas, points to the role of strategic cognitive processes in perceptual switching.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attneave F (1971) Multistability in perception. Sci Am 225(6):63–71
Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N (2001) Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nat Neurosci 4(6):645–650
Borsellino A, De Marco A, Allazetta A, Rinesi S, Bartolini B (1972) Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10(3):139–144
Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215
Cossart R, Aronov D, Yuste R (2003) Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex. Nature 423(6937):283–288
Crick F, Koch C (2003) A framework for consciousness. Nat Neurosci 6(2):119–126
Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21
Driver J, Mattingley JB (1998) Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nat Neurosci 1(1):17–22
Engel AK, Singer W (2001) Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 5(1):16–25
Fiser J, Chiu C, Weliky M (2004) Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision. Nature 431(7008):573–578
Gong P, Nikolaev AR, van Leeuwen C (2003) Scale-invariant fluctuations of the dynamical synchronization in human brain electrical activity. Neurosci Lett 336(1):33–36
Gross J, Schmitz F, Schnitzler I, Kessler K, Shapiro K, Hommel B, Schnitzler A (2004) Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(35):13050–13055
Ikegaya Y, Aaron G, Cossart R, Aronov D, Lampl I, Ferster D, Yuste R (2004) Synfire chains and cortical songs: temporal modules of cortical activity. Science 304(5670):559–564
Inui T, Tanaka S, Okada T, Nishizawa S, Katayama M, Konishi J (2000) Neural substrates for depth perception of the Necker cube; a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 282(3):145–148
İşoğlu-Alkaç Ü, Başar-Eroğlu C, Ademoğlu A, Demiralp T, Miener M, Stadler M (1998) Analysis of the electroencephalographic activity during the Necker cube reversals by means of the wavelet transform. Biol Cybern 79:437–42
Ito J, Nikolaev AR, Luman M, Aukes MF, Nakatani C, van Leeuwen C (2003) Perceptual switching, eye movements, and the bus paradox. Perception 32(6):681–698
Kenet T, Bibitchkov D, Tsodyks M, Grinvald A, Arieli A (2003) Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes. Nature 425(6961):954–956
Kleinschmidt A, Buchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc Biol Sci 265(1413):2427–2433
Kornmeier J, Bach M (2004) Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology 41(1):1–8
Kornmeier J, Bach M (2005) The Necker cube – an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vis Res 45(8):955–960
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8(4):194–208
Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3(7):254–264
Le Van Quyen M, Foucher J, Lachaux J, Rodriguez E, Lutz A, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (2001) Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony. J Neurosci Methods 111(2):83–98
Lehky SR (1995) Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proc Biol Sci 259(1354):71–76
Mao BQ, Hamzei-Sichani F, Aronov D, Froemke RC, Yuste R (2001) Dynamics of spontaneous activity in neocortical slices. Neuron 32(5):883–898
Mast FW, Kosslyn SM (2002) Visual mental images can be ambiguous: insights from individual differences in spatial transformation abilities. Cognition 86(1):57–70
Meenan JP, Miller LA (1994) Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 32(9):1145–1149
Murata T, Matsui N, Miyauchi S, Kakita Y, Yanagida T (2003) Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry. Neuroreport 14(10):1347–1352
Nakatani H, van Leeuwen C (2005) Individual differences in perceptual switching rates; the role of occipital alpha and frontal theta band activity. Biol Cybern 93(5):343–354
Peterson MA, Kihlstrom JF, Rose PM, Glisky ML (1992) Mental images can be ambiguous: reconstruals and reference-frame reversals. Mem Cognit 20(2):107–123
Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard SA, Johnson R Jr, Miller GA, Ritter W, Ruchkin DS, Rugg MD, Taylor MJ (2000) Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37(2):127–152
Press WH, Teukolshy SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1993) Numerical Recipes in C (Japanese translation). Gijutsu Hyoron Sha : 460–463
Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C (2002) Nat Rev Neurosci 3(4):261–270
Revonsuo A, Wilenius-Emet M, Kuusela J, Lehto M (1997) The neural generation of a unified illusion in human vision. Neuroreport 8(18):3867–3870
Ricci C, Blundo C (1990) Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 28(11):1163–1173
Rock I, Hall S, Davis J (1994) Why do ambiguous figures reverse?. Acta Psychol (Amst) 87(1):33–59
Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Renault B, Varela FJ (2002) Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397(6718):430–433
Shevelev IA, Kostelianetz NB, Kamenkovich VM, Sharaev GA (1991) EEG alpha-wave in the visual cortex: check of the hypothesis of the scanning process. Int J Psychophysiol 11(2):195–201
Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J (2001) The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2(4):229–239
VanRullen R, Koch C (2003) Is perception discrete or continuous?. Trends Cogn Sci 7(5):207–213
Zhou YH, Gao JB, White KD, Merk I, Yao K (2004) Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biol Cybern 90:256–263
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakatani, H., van Leeuwen, C. Transient Synchrony of Distant Brain Areas and Perceptual Switching in Ambiguous Figures. Biol Cybern 94, 445–457 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0057-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0057-9