Skip to main content
Log in

Stumbling with optimal phase reset during gait can prevent a humanoid from falling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human biped walking shows phase- dependent transient changes in gait trajectory in response to external brief force perturbations. Such responses, referred to as the stumbling reactions, are usually accompanied with phase reset of the walking rhythm. Our previous studies provided evidence, based on a human gait experiment and analyses of mathematical models of gait in the sagittal plane, that an appropriate amount of phase reset in response to a perturbation depended on the gait phase at the perturbation and could play an important role for preventing the walker from a fall, thus increasing gait stability. In this paper, we provide a further material that supports this evidence by a gait experiment on a biped humanoid. In the experiment, the impulsive force perturbations were applied using push-impacts by a pendulum-like hammer to the back of the robot during gait. The responses of the external perturbations were managed by resetting the gait phase with different delays or advancements. The results showed that appropriate amounts of phase resetting contributed to the avoidance of falling against the perturbation during the three-dimensional robot gait. A parallelism with human gait stumbling reactions was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collins S, Ruina A, Tedrake R, Wisse M (2005) Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Sci Mag 307:1082–1085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic MR, Gerasimenko Y, Pinter MM (1998) Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann NY Acad Sci 860:360–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forner Cordero A, Koopman HJFM, van der Helm FCT (2003) Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations. Gait Posture 18:47–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forner Cordero A, Koopman HJFM, van der Helm FCT (2004) Mechanical model of the recovery from stumbling. Biol Cybern 91:212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forssberg H (1979) Stumbling corrective reaction: a phase-dependent compensatory reaction during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 42(4):936–953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Brooks V (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system II. Waverly Press, Baltimore, pp 1179–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai K, Hirose M, Haikawa Y, Takenaka T (1998) The development of Honda humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1321–1326

  • Kawato M (1981) Transient and steady state phase response curves of limit cycle oscillators. J Math Biol 12:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi M, Nomura T, Sato S (2000) Phase-dependent response during human locomotion to impulsive perturbation and its interpretation based on neural mechanism (in Japanese). Trans Jpn Soc Med Biol Eng (BME) 38(1):20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeer T (1990) Passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res 9: 62–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi J, Morimoto J, Endo G, Cheng G, Schaal S, Kawato M (2004) Learning from demonstration and adaptation of biped locomotion. Robot Auton Syst 47:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schillings AM, van Wezel BM, Mulder T, Duysens J (1999) Widespread short-latency stretch reflexes and their modulation stumbling over obstacles. Brain Res 816:480–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schillings AM, van Wezel BM, Mulder T, Duysens J (2000) Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. J Neurophysiol 83:2093–2102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taga G (1995) A model of the neuro–musculo–skeletal system for human locomotion. Biol Cybern 73:97–111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya K, Aoi K, Tsujita K (2003) Locomotion control of a biped locomotion robot using nonlinear oscillators. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1745–1750

  • Van der Linde RQ (1999) Passive bipedal walking with phasic muscle contraction. Biol Cybern 81:227–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vukobratovic M, Borovac B, Surla D, Stokic D (1990) Biped locomotion. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree AT (1980) The geometry of biological time. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki T, Nomura T, Sato S (2003a) Possible functional roles of phase resetting during walking. Biol Cybern 88:468–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki T, Nomura T, Sato S (2003b) Phase reset and dynamic stability during human gait. Biosystems 71:221–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taishin Nomura.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakanishi, M., Nomura, T. & Sato, S. Stumbling with optimal phase reset during gait can prevent a humanoid from falling. Biol Cybern 95, 503–515 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0102-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0102-8

Keywords

Navigation