Abstract
We consider the issue of how to read out the information from nonstationary spike train ensembles. Based on the theory of censored data in statistics, we propose a ‘censored’ maximum-likelihood estimator (CMLE) for decoding the input in an unbiased way when the spike activity is observed over time windows of finite length. Compared with a rate-based, moment estimator, the CMLE is proved consistently more efficient, particularly with nonstationary inputs. Using our approach, we show that a dynamical input to a group of neurons can be inferred accurately and with high temporal resolution (50 ms) using as few as about one spike per neuron within each decoding window. By applying our theoretical results to a population coding setting, we then demonstrate that a spiking neural network can encode spatial information in such a way to allow fast and precise tracking of a moving target.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amari S, Nakahara H (2005) Difficulty of singularity in population coding. Neural Comput 17:839–858
Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Brown EN, Kaas RE, Mitra PP (2004) Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 7:456–461
Feng JF (2004) Computational neuroscience: a comprehensive approach. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Feng J, Ding M (2004) Decoding spikes in a spiking neuronal network. J Phys A Math Gen 37:5713–5727
Gerstner W, Kistler WM (2002) Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Gnedenko BV, Belyayev YK, Solovyev AD (1969) Mathematical methods of reliability theory. Academic, New York
Harris KD (2004) Hallucinations and nonsensory correlates of neural activity. Behav Brain Sci 27:796–796
Hollander M, Pena EA (2004) Nonparametric methods in reliability. Stat Sci 19:644–651
Horton P, Nicol A, Kendrick K, Feng JF (2005) Applications of multi-variate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to multi-electrode array electrophysiology data. J Neurosci Methods 166:22–41
Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (1997) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Paz R, Wise SP, Vaadia E (2004) Viewing and doing: similar cortical mechanisms for perceptual and motor learning. Trends Neurosci 27:496–503
Peng XM, Van Essen DC (2005) Peaked encoding of relative luminance in macaque areas V1 and V2. J Neurophysiol 93:1620–1632
Pettitt AN, Kelly JM, Gao JT (1998) Bias correction for censored data with exponential lifetimes. Statist Sinica 8:941–963
Raffi M, Siegel RM (2005) Functional architecture of spatial attention in the parietal cortex of the behaving monkey. J Neurosci 25:5171–5186
Rolls ET, Tovee MJ (1994) Processing speed in the cerebral cortex and the neurophysiology of visual masking. Proc R Soc Lond 257:9–15
Rossoni E, Feng J (2006) Non-parametric approach to extract information from interspike intervals. J Neurosci Methods 150:30–40
Sanger TD (2003) Neural population codes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:238–249
Schaette R, Gollisch T, Herz AVM (2005) Spike-train variability of auditory neurons in vivo: dynamic responses follow predictions from constant stimuli. J Neurophysiol 93:3270–3281
Shadlen MN, Newsome WT (1998) The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J Neurosci 18:3870–3896
Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381:520–522
Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to theoretical neurobiology: nonlinear and stochastic theories. Cambridge University Press, New York
Verbeek A (1989) The compactification of generalised linear models. In: Decorli A, Frances B, Gilchrist R and Seebeer G (eds) Statistical modelling. Springer, New York, pp 314–327
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossoni, E., Feng, J. Decoding spike train ensembles: tracking a moving stimulus. Biol Cybern 96, 99–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0106-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0106-4