Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuroscience from a mathematical perspective: key concepts, scales and scaling hypothesis, universality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the question of whether neuroscience allows for mathematical descriptions and whether an interaction between experimental and theoretical neuroscience can be expected to benefit both of them. It is argued that a mathematization of natural phenomena never happens by itself. First, appropriate key concepts must be found that are intimately connected with the phenomena one wishes to describe and explain mathematically. Second, the scale on, and not beyond, which a specific description can hold must be specified. Different scales allow for different conceptual and mathematical descriptions. This is the scaling hypothesis. Third, can a mathematical description be universally valid and, if so, how? Here we put forth the argument that universals also exist in theoretical neuroscience, that evolution proves the rule, and that theoretical neuroscience is a domain with still lots of space for new developments initiated by an intensive interaction with experiment. Finally, major insight is provided by a careful analysis of the way in which particular brain structures respond to perceptual input and in so doing induce action in an animal’s surroundings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This meaning of proving stems from the Latin probare, meaning testing; cf. Rall JE (1994) Proof positive. Nature 370:322. His conclusion, though, is false.

References

  1. Barth FG (ed) (1985) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein J (1902) Untersuchungen zur Thermodynamik der bioelektrischen Ströme. Pflügers Arch 92:521–562 [English translation in: Boylan JW (ed) (1971) Founders of experimental physiology. JF Lehmanns Verlag, München, pp 258–299]. For more detailed information, see: Seyfarth E-A (2006) Julius Bernstein (1839–1917): pioneer neurobiologist and biophysicist. Biol Cybern 94:2–8

  3. Bonhoeffer KF (1948) Activation of passive iron as a model for the excitation of nerve. J Gen Physiol 32:69–79. Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer had a brilliant career as a physical chemist, and outside of neuroscience, he is mainly credited for his work on ortho- and parahydrogen. He was the son of the equally famous Karl Bonhoeffer, who held the psychiatry chair at Berlin’s Charité hospital. See the obituary of Moelwyn-Hughes EA (1957) Nature 180:16–17. For a more extensive and impartial review of both the scientist and the circumstances of his professional life, one may consult Schindewolf U (2002) Zur Erinnerung an Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer (1899–1957). BunsenMagazin 4(6):139–146

  4. Braitenberg V (1992) Manifesto of brain sciences. In: Aertsen A, Braitenberg V (eds) Information processing in the cortex. Springer, Berlin, pp 473–477 [reprinted in Biol Cybern 108(5). doi:10.1007/s00422-014-0630-6]

  5. Braitenberg V (2000) Informationsbiologie. Laborjournal 8/2000:18–20

  6. To become acquainted with the intellectual diversity of Valentino Braitenberg’s views on the close relations between neuroscience and philosophy, see his complete list of his publications in: Hosp I, Schüz A, Braitenberg Z (2011) Tentakel des Geistes: Begegnungen mit Valentin Braitenberg. Raetia/Arunda, Bozen/Bolzano, pp 302–317

  7. Brownell PH (1977) Compressional and surface waves in sand: used by desert scorpions to locate prey. Science 1977:479–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brownell PH, Farley RD (1979) Detection of vibrations in sand by tarsal sense organs of the nocturnal scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis. J Comp Physiol 131:23–30; Orientation to vibrations in sand by the nocturnal scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis: mechanism of target localization. J Comp Physiol 131:31–38

  9. Brownell PH, van Hemmen JL (2001) Vibration sensitivity and a computational theory for prey-localizing behavior in sand scorpions. Am Zool 41(5):1229–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brownell PH, Polis G (eds) (2001) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chalmers DJ (2000) What is a neural correlate of consciousness? In: Metzinger T (ed) Neural correlates of consciousness: empirical and conceptual questions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Wang W, Tyler-Kabara EC, Weber DJ, McMorland AJC, Velliste M, Boninger ML, Schwartz AB (2013) High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet 381:557–564

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Damasio A (2010) Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dijksterhuis EJ (1961) The mechanization of the world picture. Oxford University Press, Oxford. The German translation Die Mechanisierung des Weltbildes was published by Springer (Heidelberg) in 1956. For the Dutch original, De mechanisering van het wereldbeeld (Meulenhoff, Amsterdam, 1950), the author received the Dutch state prize for literature (P.C. Hooft Prize) in 1952

  15. Dijksterhuis EJ (1970) Simon Stevin: science in the Netherlands around 1600. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Dirac PAM (1930) Quantum mechanics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 4th edn. 1958. For a more detailed explanation, see also Messiah A (1961) Quantum mechanics, vol 1, chap 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  17. Ermentrout GB, Terman DH (2010) Mathematical foundations of neuroscience. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. de Finetti B (1974/75) Theory of probability, vols I & II. Wiley, London

  19. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE (1986) Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233:1416–1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerstner W, Kempter R, van Hemmen JL, Wagner H (1996) A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature 383:76–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heisenberg W (1931) Kausalgesetz und Quantenmechanik. Erkenntnis 2:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Hemmen JL (2006) What is a neuronal map, how does it arise, and what is it good for? In: van Hemmen JL, Sejnowski TJ (eds) 23 Problems in systems neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 83–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. van Hemmen JL (2007) Biology and mathematics: a fruitful merger of two cultures. Biol Cybern 97:1–3. The examples that follow are due to this paper.

  24. van Hemmen JL, Schwartz AB (2008) Population vector code: a geometric universal as actuator. Biol Cybern 98:509–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. The impetus to writing the present paper stems from a meeting devoted to Homo neurobiologicus, which was organized by the Hanns Seidel Foundation in Munich, June 21 & 22, 2012. Nevertheless, without Valentino Braitenberg the paper at hand would never have been finished. The text just referred to is a compact German version on a similar issue, which has appeared as the meeting’s spin-off in: Höfling S and Tretter F (eds) (2013) Homo neurobiologicus. Hanns Seidel Stiftung, München, Argumente und Materialien zum Zeitgeschehen 87:71–82

  26. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapfer C, Seidl AH, Schweizer H, Grothe B (2002) Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons. Nat Neurosci 5:247–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kekulé A (1872) Über einige Condensationsproducte des Aldehyds. Ann d Chem u Pharm 162:77–124

  29. Koch C (1999) Biophysics of computation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts, Englewood, CO. See Koch, Damasio [13], and Northoff [42] for an expert sampling of the huge literature on the subject of consciousness

  31. Konishi M (1993) Listening with two ears. Sci Am 268(4):34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Küchenhoff H (2008) Coin tossing and spinning—useful classroom experiments for teaching statistics. In: Shalabh, Heumann C (eds) Recent advances in linear models and related areas: essays in honour of Helge Toutenburg. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 417–426

  33. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; later, enlarged, editions appeared in 1970, 1996, and 2012

  34. Lang HH (1980) Surface wave sensitivity of the back swimmer Notonecta glauca. Naturw 67:204–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leibold C (2007) Private communication

  36. Luksch H (2009) Optic tectum: sensorimotor integration. In: Squire LR (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience, vol 7. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 263–269

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275:213–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1943) A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphey RK, Mendenhall B (1973) Localization of receptors controlling orientation to prey by the back swimmer Notonecta undulata. J Comp Physiol A 84:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murphey RK (1973) Mutual inhibition and the organization of a non-visual orientation in Notonecta. J Comp Physiol A 84:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Newton I (1687) Philosophae naturalis principia mathematica. Streater, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Northoff G (2014) Unlocking the brain. Vol 2: Consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York

  43. Pfister J-P, Gerstner W (2006) Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci 26:9673–9682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schüz A (2013) Private communication

  45. Simonyi K (2012) A cultural history of physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smolin L (2006) The trouble with physics. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. The author is a very outspoken critic of modern string theory. As such, his book is quite controversial but underlines the vital importance of an open scientific discussion

  47. Stevin S (1586) De beghinselen der weeghconst. Van Raphelinghen/Plantijn, Leyden. See also Dijksterhuis [14, Fig. 27], and his book on Stevin [15]. Simon Stevin was a universal scientist. In 1605, for instance, inspired by the work of Vincenzo Galilei (father of Galileo), he was the first scientist in the West to mention equal temperament in music theory. He was unable at that time to accurately calculate the 12th root of 2 and therefore divided the octave into 12 steps; cf. Dijksterhuis [15, Chap. XI]

  48. Stürzl W, Kempter R, van Hemmen JL (2000) Theory of arachnid prey localization. Phys Rev Lett 84:5668–5671

  49. Velliste M, Perel S, Spalding MC, Whitford AS, Schwartz AB (2008) Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 453:1098–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

It is the author’s great pleasure to thank Henk Broer (Groningen), Robert Miller (Otago), Georg Northoff (Ottawa), Almut Schüz (Tübingen), and Theo Wobbes (Nijmegen) for constructive feedback. He acknowledges financial support from the BMBF through the BCCN—Munich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Leo van Hemmen.

Additional information

This article forms part of a special issue of Biological Cybernetics entitled “Structural Aspects of Biological Cybernetics: Valentino Braitenberg, Neuroanatomy, and Brain Function”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Hemmen, J.L. Neuroscience from a mathematical perspective: key concepts, scales and scaling hypothesis, universality. Biol Cybern 108, 701–712 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-014-0609-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-014-0609-3

Keywords

Navigation