Skip to main content
Log in

Conductance-based refractory density approach: comparison with experimental data and generalization to lognormal distribution of input current

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conductance-based refractory density (CBRD) approach is an efficient tool for modeling interacting neuronal populations. The model describes the firing activity of a statistical ensemble of uncoupled Hodgkin–Huxley-like neurons, each receiving individual Gaussian noise and a common time-varying deterministic input. However, the approach requires experimental validation and extension to cases of distributed input signals (or input weights) among different neurons of such an ensemble. Here the CBRD model is verified by comparing with experimental data and then generalized for a lognormal (LN) distribution of the input weights. The model with equal weights is shown to reproduce efficiently the post-spike time histograms and the membrane voltage of experimental multiple trial response of single neurons to a step-wise current injection. The responses reveal a more rapid reaction of the firing-rate than voltage. Slow adaptive potassium channels strongly affected the shape of the responses. Next, a computationally efficient CBRD model is derived for a population with the LN input weight distribution and is compared with the original model with equal input weights. The analysis shows that the LN distribution: (1) provides a faster response, (2) eliminates oscillations, (3) leads to higher sensitivity to weak stimuli, and (4) increases the coefficient of variation of interspike intervals. In addition, a simplified firing-rate type model is tested, showing improved precision in the case of a LN distribution of weights. The CBRD approach is recommended for complex, biophysically detailed simulations of interacting neuronal populations, while the modified firing-rate type model is recommended for computationally reduced simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borg-Graham L (1999) Interpretations of data and mechanisms for hippocampal pyramidal cell models. Cereb Cortex 13:19–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brette R (2015) What is the most realistic single-compartment model of spike initiation? PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brunel N, Hakim V (1999) Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput 11:1621–1671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchin AJ, Chizhov AV (2010) Modified firing-rate model reproduces synchronization of a neuronal population receiving complex input. Opt Mem Neural Netw 19:166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain N, Iyer R, Koch C, Mihalas S (2016) The computational properties of a simplified cortical column model. PLoS Comput Biol 12(9):e1005045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chizhov AV (2014) Conductance-based refractory density model of primary visual cortex. J Comput Neurosci 36(2):297–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chizhov AV, Graham LJ (2007) Population model of hippocampal pyramidal neurons, linking a refractory density approach to conductance-based neurons. Phys Rev E 75:011924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chizhov AV, Graham LJ (2008) Efficient evaluation of neuron populations receiving colored-noise current based on a refractory density method. Phys Rev E 77:011910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chizhov AV, Rodrigues S, Terry JR (2007) A comparative analysis of a firing-rate model and a conductance-based neural population model. Phys Lett A 369:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou C, Bugmann G (2001) Coefficient of variation vs. mean interspike interval curves: what do they tell us about the brain? Neurocomputing 38–40:1141–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert J, van Hemmen JL (2001) Modeling neuronal assemblies: theory and implementation. Neural Comput 13:1923–1974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud-Trocmé N, van Vreeswijk C, Hansel D, Brunel N (2003) How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J Neurosci 23:11628–11640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner W, Kistler WM (2002) Noise in spiking neuron models. In: Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 147–200

  • Gerstner W, Kistler WM, Naud R, Paninski L (2014) Introduction: neurons and mathematics. In: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition. Cambridge University Press (CUP), Cambridge, pp 395–416

  • Harrison L, David O, Friston K (2007) Neuronal models of ensemble dynamics. In: Statistical parametric mapping. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam

  • Ilin V, Malyshev A, Wolf F, Volgushev M (2013) Fast computations in cortical ensembles require rapid initiation of action potentials. J Neurosci 33:2281–2292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer R, Menon V, Buice M, Koch C, Mihalas S (2013) The influence of synaptic weight distribution on neuronal population dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesma PIM (1968) Diffusion models for the stochastic activity of neurons. In: Caianiello ER (ed) Neural Networks: Proceedings of the School on Neural Networks Ravello, June 1967. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 116–144

  • Knight BW (1972) Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. J Gen Physiol 59:734–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knight BW, Omurtag A, Sirovich L (2000) The approach of a neuron population firing rate to a new equilibrium: an exact theoretical result. Neural Comput 12:1045–1055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopell N, Ermentrout GB, Whittington MA, Traub RD (2000) Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Neurobiology 97(4):1867–1872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lansky P, Sanda P, He J (2006) The parameters of the stochastic leaky integrate-and-fire neuronal model. J Comput Neurosci 21:211–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naud R, Gerstner W (2012) Coding and decoding with adapting neurons: a population approach to the peri-stimulus time histogram. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nykamp DQ, Tranchina D (2000) A population density approach that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: analysis and an application to orientation tuning. J Comput Neurosci 8(1):19–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omurtag A, Knight BW, Sirovich L (2000) Dynamics of neuronal populations: the equilibrium solution. SIAM J Appl Math 60:2009–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payeur A, Maler L, Longtin A (2015) Oscillatory like behavior in feedforward neuronal networks. Phys Rev E 92(1):012703

  • Shriki O, Hansel D, Sompolinsky H (2003) Rate models for conductance-based cortical neuronal networks. Neural Comput 15:1809–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Softky WR, Koch C (1993) The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J Neurosci 13:334–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Sjostrom PJ, Reigl M, Nelson S, Chklovskii DB (2005) Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits. PLoS Biol 3:e68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tchumatchenko T, Malyshev A, Wolf F, Volgushev M (2011) Ultrafast population encoding by cortical neurons. J Neurosci 31:12171–12179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teramae JN, Fukai T (2014) Computational implications of lognormally distributed synaptic weights. Proc IEEE 102:500–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volgushev M (2015) Cortical specializations underlying fast computations. Neuroscientist 22:145–164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project 16-15-10201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton V. Chizhov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chizhov, A.V. Conductance-based refractory density approach: comparison with experimental data and generalization to lognormal distribution of input current. Biol Cybern 111, 353–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0727-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0727-9

Keywords

Navigation