Skip to main content
Log in

A simple population protocol for fast robust approximate majority

  • Published:
Distributed Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe and analyze a 3-state one-way population protocol to compute approximate majority in the model in which pairs of agents are drawn uniformly at random to interact. Given an initial configuration of x’s, y’s and blanks that contains at least one non-blank, the goal is for the agents to reach consensus on one of the values x or y. Additionally, the value chosen should be the majority non-blank initial value, provided it exceeds the minority by a sufficient margin. We prove that with high probability n agents reach consensus in O(n log n) interactions and the value chosen is the majority provided that its initial margin is at least \({\omega(\sqrt{n} \,{\rm log}\, n)}\). This protocol has the additional property of tolerating Byzantine behavior in \({o(\sqrt{n})}\) of the agents, making it the first known population protocol that tolerates Byzantine agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alon N. and Spencer J.H. (1992). The Probabilistic Method. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin D., Aspnes J., Diamadi Z., Fischer M.J. and Peralta R. (2006). Computation in networks of passively mobile finite-state sensors. Distrib. Comput. 18(4): 235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Angluin, D., Aspnes, J., Eisenstat, D.: Fast computation by population protocols with a leader. In: Distributed Computing: 20th International Symposium, DISC 2006: Stockholm, Sweden, September 2006: Proceedings, pp. 61–75 (2006)

  4. Angluin D., Aspnes J., Eisenstat D. and Ruppert E. (2007). The computational power of population protocols. Distrib. Comput. 20(4): 279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aspnes J. and Ruppert E. (2007). An introduction to population protocols. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Theor. Comput. Sci. 93: 98–117

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow Y.S., Robbins H. and Siegmund D. (1991). The Theory of Optimal Stopping. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ezhilchelvan, P., Mostefaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Randomized multivalued consensus. In: ISORC ’01: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, p. 195. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2001)

  8. Feller W. (1958). An Introduction to Probability and its Applications, vol. 1, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gillespie D.T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81(25): 2340–2361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillespie D.T. (1992). A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation. Physica A 188: 404–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimmet G.R. and Stirzaker D.R. (1992). Probability and Random Processes, 2nd edn. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz, T.G.: Approximation of Population Processes. No. 36 in CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1981)

  13. Mostefaoui A., Raynal M. and Tronel F. (2000). From binary consensus to multivalued consensus in asynchronous message-passing systems. Inform. Proces. Lett. 73(5–6): 2007–212

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wormald N.C. (1995). Differential equations for random processes and random graphs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5(4): 1217–1235

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Aspnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angluin, D., Aspnes, J. & Eisenstat, D. A simple population protocol for fast robust approximate majority. Distrib. Comput. 21, 87–102 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-008-0059-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-008-0059-z

Keywords

Navigation