Abstract
Scaling properties of modular quantum systems will dominate the future of quantum computing as well as the potential role of quantum mechanics in classical computing. We undertake a brief journey through length- and time-scales in order to locate pertinent control schemes. It is argued that ‘‘quantum benefits’’ are more likely to survive in ‘‘imbodied’’ systems like coherently driven materials, sensors or robots than in abstract digital computation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schroeder M (1991) Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. H Freeman and Company, New York
Landauer R (1999) Physica A 263:63
Nielsen MA, Chuang IL (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schönhage A (1979) In: Automata, Languages and Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 71, p 520, Springer
Abrams DS, Lloyd S (1998) Phys Rev Lett 81:3992
Zak M (1999) In: Lecture Notes in Comp Science vol 1509 p 160, Springer
Alicki R (2000) LANL preprint quant-ph/0006018
Lavor C et al. (2003) LANL preprint quant-ph/0303175
Mahler G, Weberuss VA (1998) Quantum Networks, (2nd edition). Springer, Berlin New York
Josza R, Linden N (2002) LANL preprint quant-ph/0201143
Lubkin E (1978) Math Phys 19:1028
Skyora S (1974) J Statist Phys 11:17
Mahler G, Otte A, Stollsteimer M (2003) Int J Circ Theory Appl 31:3
Thirring W (1983) A Course in Mathematical Physics 4: Quantum Mechanics of Large Systems. Springer, Heidelberg
Gemmer J, Otte A, Mahler G (2001) Phys Rev Lett 68:1927
Gemmer J, Mahler G (2003) Eur Phys J B 31:249
Jensen RV, Shankar R (1985) Phys Rev Lett 54:1879
Michel M, Hartmann H, Gemmer J, Mahler G (2003) Eur Phys J B 34:325
Wolf SA et al. (2001) Science 294:1488
Mahler G, May V, Schreiber M (eds)(1996) Molecular Electronics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Wang KL (2002) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:235
Lozovik YE et al. (2003) Phys Lett A 313:112
Lent CS et al. (1993) Appl Phys Lett 62:714
Girlanda M, Macucci M (2002) J Appl Phys 92:536
Moore GE (1975) Int Elec Devices Mtg, Technical Digest IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, 75:11
Skinner AJ, Kane BE (2002) LANL preprint, quant-ph/0206159
Steane AM (2003) LANL preprint, quant-ph/0304016
Quantum roadmap: http://qist.lanl.gov
Hamann SE et al. (1998) Phys Rev Lett 80:4149
Chiorescu I et al. (2003) Science 299:1869
Benioff P (2000) LANL preprint quant-ph/0003006
Hau L (1999) Nature 397:594
Hogg T, Chase JG (1996) In: PhysComp96, New England Complex Systems Institute. Toffoli T, Biafore M, Leao J (eds) p 147
H Cruse et al. (2002) In: Ayers J, Davis JL, Rudolph A (eds) Neurotechnology for Biomimetic Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 283
Zeh HD (1996) In: Giulini D et al. (eds) Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin New York, p 5
http://www.foresight.org
Nielsen MA (2002) LANL preprint, quant-ph/0210005
Beth T, private communication
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahler, G. Quantum mechanics and classical computing . Informatik Forsch. Entw. 21, 91–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-006-0015-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-006-0015-8