Skip to main content
Log in

A Class of Algorithms for Collision Resolution with Multiplicity Estimation

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wireless connectivity in pervasive computing has ephemeral character and can be used for creating ad hoc networks, sensor networks, connection with RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags etc. The communication tasks in such wireless networks often involve an inquiry over a shared channel, which can be invoked for: discovery of neighboring devices in ad hoc networks, counting the number of RFID tags that have a certain property, estimating the mean value contained in a group of sensors etc. Such an inquiry solicits replies from possibly large number of terminals n. This necessitates the usage of algorithms for resolving batch collisions (conflicts) with unknown conflict multiplicity n. In this paper we present a novel approach to the problem of collision resolution for batch conflicts. We show how the conventional tree algorithms for collision resolution can be used to obtain progressively accurate estimation of the multiplicity. We use the estimation to propose a more efficient binary tree algorithm, termed Estimating Binary Tree (EBT) algorithm. The EBT algorithm is suited for implementation when the conflicting nodes are passive, such as e.g. RFID tags. We extend the approach to design the Interval Estimation Conflict Resolution (IECR) algorithm. For n→∞ we prove that the efficiency achieved by IECR for batch arrivals is identical with the efficiency that Gallager’s FCFS algorithm achieves for Poisson packet arrivals. For finite n, the simulation results show that IECR is, to the best of our knowledge, the most efficient batch resolution algorithm reported to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chlamtac, I., Conti, M., Liu, J.: Mobile ad hoc networking: Imperatives and challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. J. 1(1), (2003)

  2. Akylidiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayrici, E.: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(8), 102–116 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hush, D.R., Wood, C.: Analysis of tree algorithms for RFID arbitration. In: Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Boston, USA, August 1998

  4. Cidon, I., Sidi, M.: Conflict multiplicity estimation and batch resolution algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 34, 101–110 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes, J.F.: An adaptive technique for local distribution. IEEE Trans. Commun. 26, 1178–1186 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Capetanakis, J.I.: Tree algorithms for packet broadcast channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 25, 505–515 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsybakov, B.S., Mikhailov, V.A.: Free synchronous packet access in broadcast channel with feedback. Probl. Pereda. Inf. 14(4), 32–59 (1978)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallager, R.G.: Conflict resolution in random access broadcast networks. In: Proc. AFOSR Workshop Commun. Theory Appl., Provincetown, MA, September 1978, pp. 74–76 (1978)

  9. Greenberg, A.G., Flajolet, P., Ladner, R.E.: Estimating the multiplicities of conflict to speed their resolution in multiple access channels. J. ACM 34(2), 289–325 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Massey, J.L.: Collision-Resolution Algorithms and Random-Access Communications. CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 265, pp. 73–137. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vvedenskaya, N.D., Pinsker, M.S.: Non-optimality of the part-and-try algorithm. In: Abstracts Intl. Workshop Conv. Codes, Multiuser Comm., Sochi, USSR, pp. 141–148 (1983)

  12. Mosely, J., Humblet, P.: A class of efficient contention resolution algorithms for multiple access channels. IEEE Trans. Commun. 33(2), 145–151 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motwani, R., Raghavan, P.: Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Berstekas, D., Gallager, R.: Data Networks, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rom, R., Sidi, M.: Multiple Access Protocols: Performance and Analysis. Springer, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tay, Y.C., Jamieson, K., Balakrishnan, H.: Collision-minimizing CSMA and its applications to wireless sensor networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 22(6), 1048–1057 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Molle, M.L., Polyzos, G.C.: Conflict resolution algorithms and their performance analysis. Tech. Rep. CS93-300, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, UCSD, July 1993

  18. Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, IEEE Std. 802.11 (1997)

  20. Leon-Garcia, A.: Probability and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petar Popovski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popovski, P., Fitzek, F.H.P. & Prasad, R. A Class of Algorithms for Collision Resolution with Multiplicity Estimation. Algorithmica 49, 286–317 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-007-9082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-007-9082-x

Keywords

Navigation