Skip to main content
Log in

Transitive Matrices, Strict Preference Order and Ordinal Evaluation Operators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let X ={x 1, x 2, ..., x n } be a set of alternatives and a ij a positive number expressing how much the alternative x i is preferred to the alternative x j . Under suitable hypothesis of no indifference and transitivity over the pairwise comparison matrix A=(a ij ), the actual qualitative ranking on the set X is achievable. Then a coherent priority vector is a vector giving a weighted ranking agreeing with the actual ranking and an ordinal evaluation operator is a functional F that, acting on the row vectors \(\underline{a}_{i}\) , translates A in a coherent priority vector. In this paper we focus our attention on the matrix A, looking for conditions ensuring the existence of coherent priority vectors. Then, given a type of matrices, we look for ordinal evaluation operators, including OWA operators, associated to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aczel J (1966) Lectures on functional equations and their application. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aczel J, Saaty TL (1983) Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. J Math Psychol 27:93–102

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Basile L, D’Apuzzo L (1996) Ordering for classes of aggregation operators. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. NJ, 4.2:145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Basile L, D’Apuzzo L (1997) Ranking and weak consistency in the A.H.P. Context. Rivista di matematica per le scienze economiche e sociali 20(1)

  5. Basile L, D’Apuzzo L (2002) Weak consistency and quasi-linear means imply the actual ranking. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 10(3):227–239

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Krovac J (1987) Ranking alternatives-comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices. Eur J Operat Res 32:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Narasimhan R (1982) A geometric averaging procedure for constructing super transitive approximation to binary comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8:53–56

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts FS (1979) Measurement theory with applications to decisionmaking, utility, and social sciences. Encyclopedia Math Appl, vol. 7. Giancarlo Rota (eds). Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts

  9. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 32:841–855

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty TL (1988) Decision making for leaders. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saaty TL (1990) Eigenvector and logarithmitc lest squares. Eur J Operat Res 48:156–160

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. In: IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Basile.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basile, L., D’Apuzzo, L. Transitive Matrices, Strict Preference Order and Ordinal Evaluation Operators. Soft Comput 10, 933–940 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0020-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0020-z

Keywords

Navigation