Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A differential evolution based algorithm for breaking the visual steganalytic system

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image steganography is the process of sending messages secretly by hiding the message in image content. Steganalytic techniques are used to detect whether an image contains a hidden message by analyzing various image features between stego-images (the images containing hidden messages) and cover-images (the images containing no hidden messages). In the past, genetic algorithm (GA) was applied to design a robust steganographic system that breaks the steganalytic systems. However, GA consumes too much time to converge to the optimal solution. In this paper, we use a different evolutionary approach, named differential evolution (DE), to increase the performance of the steganographic system. The key element that DE is distinguished from other population based approaches is differential mutation, which aims to find the global optimum of a multidimensional, multimodal function. Experimental results show that the application of the DE based steganography not only improves the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) of the stego-image, but also promotes the normalized correlation (NC) of the extracted secret message for the same number of iterations. It is observed that the percentage increase in PSNR values ranges from 5% to 13% and that of NC values ranges from 0.8% to 3%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avcibas I, Memon N, Sankur B (2003) Steganalysis using image quality metrics. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(2): 221–229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer H, Schwefel H (2004) Evolution strategies—a comprehensive introduction. Nat Comput 1: 3–52

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FC, Huang HC, Hang HM (2007) Layered access control schemes on watermarked scalable media. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol 49(3): 443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox IJ, Miller M, Bloom J (2001) Digital watermarking: principles & practice. Morgan Kaufmann, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridrich J, Goljan M, Hogea D (2003) New methodology for breaking steganographic techniques for JPEGs. In: Proc. of SPIE Electronic Imaging, Santa Clara, CA, pp 143–155

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Karboga D, Okdem S (2004) A simple and global optimization algorithm for engineering problems: differential evolution algorithm. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 12(1): 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler GC (2004) An overview of steganography for the computer forensics examiner. Forensic Sci Commun 6(3): 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan JS, Huang HC, Jain LC (eds) (2004) Intelligent watermarking techniques. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Price K, Storn R, Lampinen J (2005) Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Provos N, Honeyman P (2003) Hide and seek: an introduction to steganography. IEEE Secur Priv Mag 1(3): 32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh CS, Huang HC, Wang FH, Pan JS (2004) Genetic watermarking based on transform domain techniques. Pattern Recognit 37(3): 555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih FY (2007) Digital watermarking and steganography: fundamentals and techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayner P (2002) Disappearing cryptography: information hiding: steganography and watermarking, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfeld A, Pfitzmann A (1999a) Attacks on steganographic systems breaking the steganographic utilities Ezstego, Jsteg, Steganos and S-tools and some lessons learned. In: Proc. of Third Intl. Workshop on Information Hiding, Dresden, Germany, pp 61–76

  • Westfeld A, Pfitzmann A (1999b) Attacks on steganographic systems. In: Proc. of Third Intl. Workshop on Information Hiding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, vol 1768, pp 61–76

  • Wu Y, Shih FY (2006) Genetic algorithm based methodology for breaking the steganalytic systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 36(1): 24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computing Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA

    Frank Y. Shih & Venkata Gopal Edupuganti

Authors
  1. Frank Y. Shih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Venkata Gopal Edupuganti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Y. Shih.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shih, F.Y., Edupuganti, V.G. A differential evolution based algorithm for breaking the visual steganalytic system. Soft Comput 13, 345–353 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0330-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0330-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation