Skip to main content
Log in

Particle swarm optimization with expanding neighborhood topology for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a new algorithmic nature-inspired approach that uses particle swarm optimization (PSO) with different neighborhood topologies, for successfully solving one of the most computationally complex problems, the permutation flowshop scheduling problem (PFSP). The PFSP belongs to the class of combinatorial optimization problems characterized as NP-hard and, thus, heuristic and metaheuristic techniques have been used in order to find high quality solutions in reasonable computational time. The proposed algorithm for the solution of the PFSP, the PSO with expanding neighborhood topology, combines a PSO algorithm, the variable neighborhood search strategy and a path relinking strategy. As, in general, the structure of the social network affects strongly a PSO algorithm, the proposed method using an expanding neighborhood topology manages to increase the performance of the algorithm. As the algorithm starts from a small size neighborhood and by increasing (expanding) in each iteration the size of the neighborhood, it ends to a neighborhood that includes all the swarm, and it manages to take advantage of the exploration abilities of a global neighborhood structure and of the exploitation abilities of a local neighborhood structure. In order to test the effectiveness and the efficiency of the proposed method, we use a set of benchmark instances of different sizes and compare the proposed method with a number of other PSO algorithms and other algorithms from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks A, Vincent J, Anyakoha C (2007) A review of particle swarm optimization. Part I: background and development. Nat Comput 6(4):467–484

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banks A, Vincent J, Anyakoha C (2008) A review of particle swarm optimization. Part II: hybridisation, combinatorial, multicriteria and constrained optimization, and indicative applications. Nat Comput 7:109–124

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-H, Chang P-C, Cheng TCE, Zhang Q (2012) A self-guided genetic algorithm for permutation flowshop scheduling problems. Comput Oper Res 39:1450–1457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm: explosion, stability and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dueck G, Scheurer T (1990) Threshold accepting: a general purpose optimization algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing. J Comput Phys 90:161–175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction. 2nd edn. Wiley, England

  • Gajpal Y, Rajendran C (2006) An ant-colony optimization algorithm for minimizing the completion-time variance of jobs in flowshops. Int J Prod Econ 101(2):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS, Sethi R (1976) The complexity of flowshop and jobshop scheduling. Math Oper Res 1:117–129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glover F, Laguna M, Marti R (2003) Scatter search and path relinking: advances and applications. Handbook of metaheuristics. In: Glover F, Kochenberger GA (eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 1–36

  • Grabowski J, Wodecki M (2004) A very fast Tabu search algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with makespan criterion. Comput Oper Res 31:1891–1909

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta JND, Stafford EF Jr (2006) Flowshop scheduling research after five decades. Eur J Oper Res 169:699–711

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Mladenovic N (2001) Variable neighborhood search: principles and applications. Eur J Oper Res 130:449–467

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jarboui B, Ibrahim S, Siarry P, Rebai A (2008) A combinatorial particle swarm optimisation for solving permutation flow shop problems. Comput Ind Eng 54:526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S (1954) Optimal two-and-three stage production schedules with setup times included. Naval Res Logistics Q 1:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc AESF Annu Tech Conf 1995 IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 4:1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J (1997) The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 303–308

  • Lian Z, Gu X, Jiao B (2006) A similar particle swarm optimization algorithm for permutation flowshop scheduling to minimize makespan. Appl Math Comput 175(1):773–785

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C-J, Tseng C-T, Luarn P (2007) A discrete version of particle swarm optimization for flowshop scheduling problems. Comput Oper Res 34:3099–3111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtblau D (2002) Discrete optimization using mathematica. World multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (SCI 2002). In: Callaos N, Ebisuzaki T, Starr B, Abe JM, Lichtblau D (eds) International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, vol 16, pp 169–174

  • Liu B, Wang L, Jin Y-H (2007) An effective PSO-based memetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics Part B Cybernetics 37(1):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y-F, Liu S-Y (2011) A hybrid discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Appl Soft Comput. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.10.024

  • Lourenco HR, Martin O, Stϋtzle T (2002) Iterated local search. Handbook of metaheuristics. Vol. 57 of Operations Research and Management Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 321–353

  • Morton TE, Pentico DW (1993) Heuristic scheduling systems with applications to production systems and project management. Wiley, New York

  • Nowicki E, Smutnicki C (1996) A fast Tabu search algorithm for the permutation flow-shop problem. Eur J Oper Res 91:160–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Q-K, Tasgetiren MF, Liang Y-C (2008) A discrete differential evolution algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Comput Ind Eng 55:795–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo M (1995) Scheduling. Theory, algorithms, and systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  • Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization. An overview. Swarm Intell. 1:33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran C, Ziegler H (2004) Ant-colony algorithms for permutation flowshop scheduling to minimize makespan/total flowtime of jobs. Eur J Oper Res 155(2):426–438

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran C, Ziegler H (2005) Two ant-colony algorithms for minimizing total flowtime in permutation flowshops. Comput Ind Eng 48(4):789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz R, Maroto C (2005) A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics. Eur J Oper Res 165:479–494

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz R, Stützle T (2007) A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 177:2033–2049

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz R, Maroto C, Alcaraz J (2006) Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem. Omega 34:461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of 1998 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp 69–73

  • Suganthan PN (1999) Particle swarm optimiser with neighborhood operator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1958–1962

  • Taillard E (1993) Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems. Eur J Oper Res 64:278–285

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tasgetiren M, Liang Y, Sevkli M, Gencyilmaz G (2007) A particle swarm optimization algorithm for makespan and total flow time minimization in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem. Eur J Oper Res 177:1930–1947

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng L-Y, Lin Y-T (2009) A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 198:84–92

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng L-Y, Lin Y-T (2010) A genetic local search algorithm for minimizing total flowtime in the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Int J Prod Econ 127:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallada E, Ruiz R (2009) Cooperative metaheuristics for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 193:365–376

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ying KC, Liao CJ (2004) An ant colony system for permutation flow-shop sequencing. Comput Oper Res 31:791–801

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Ning J, Ouyang D (2010) A hybrid alternate two phases particle swarm optimization algorithm for flow shop scheduling problem. Comput Ind Eng 58:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Sun J, Zhu X, Yang Q (2008) An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for flowshop scheduling problem. Inf Process Lett 108:204–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zobolas GI, Tarantilis CD, Ioannou G (2009) Minimizing makespan in permutation flow shop scheduling problems using a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm. Comput Oper Res 36:1249–1267

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yannis Marinakis.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Alba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M. Particle swarm optimization with expanding neighborhood topology for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Soft Comput 17, 1159–1173 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-0992-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-0992-z

Keywords

Navigation