Abstract
Memorizing the past information for later environments is an effective and widely employed approach to optimize dynamic problems. Although the existing explicit memories for dynamic optimization differ widely in the literature, all of them organize memory entries in a linear list. This naive structure leads to problems, such as heavy computational overhead and small memory capacity, and thus restricts the performance of the memories. In this paper, the binary space partition tree is adopted to organize the memory entries, and then a memory tree is constructed. The memory tree partitions the search space into regions. In order to make use of the memory tree, a neighbor shift strategy is proposed. When a new individual is generated in a region that has never been visited since the last change, the new individual is shifted to the neighboring memory individual of that region, if it is less fit than the memory individual. The proposed approach can be easily combined with many population-based algorithms for dynamic optimization in the real space. As examples, the proposed approach was combined with a basic particle swarm optimizer and two state-of-the-art dynamic optimizers. The experimental results showed that it significantly enhanced the performance of the three optimizers on various test problems. The proposed approach demonstrates the importance of memory structure in memory approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The cycle length means is the number of states or problem instances in a cyclic dynamic problem.
References
Barlow GJ (2011) Improving memory for optimization and learning in dynamic environments. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Bendtsen CN, Krink T (2002) Dynamic memory model for non-stationary optimization. In: Proceedings 2002 Congress Evolutionary Computation, pp 145–150
Bird S, Li X (2006) Enhancing the robustness of a speciation-based pso. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, pp 843–850
Bird S, Li X (2007) Using regression to improve local convergence. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2007
Blackwell T, Branke J (2006) Multiswarms, exclusion, and anti-convergence in dynamic environments. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(4):459–472
Bosman (2005) Learning, anticipation and time deception in evolutionary online dynamic optimization. In: GECCO’05, Washington, pp 39–47
Branke J (1999) Memory enhanced evolutionary algorithms for changing optimization problems. In: The 1999 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Washington, pp 1875–1882
Branke J (2002) Evolutionary optimization in dynamic environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Branke J, Kaußler T, Schmidt C, Schmeck H (2000) A multi-population approach to dynamic optimization problems
Brest J, Zamuda A, Boskovic B, Maucec MS, Zumer V (2009) Dynamic optimization using self-adaptive differential evolution. In: The 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Trondheim, pp 415–422
Cao Y, Luo W (2010) A novel updating strategy for associative memory scheme in cyclic dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence, Suzhou
Cedeno W, Vemuri VR (1997) On the use of niching for dynamic landscapes. In: The 1997 International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 361–366
Chow CK, Yuen SY (2011) An evolutionary algorithm that makes decision based on the entire previous search history. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 15(6):741–769
Chow CK, Yuen SY (2012) A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that diversifies population by its density. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16(2):149–172
Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm—explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73
Cobb HG (1990) An investigation into the use of hypermutation as an adaptive operator in genetic algorithms having continuous, time-dependent nonstationary environments. Technical Report AIC-90-001, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington
Dasgupta D, McGregor DR (1992) Nonstationary function optimization using the structured genetic algorithm
Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) New optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the 1995 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, pp 39–43
Eggermont J, Lenaerts T (2002) Dynamic optimization using evolutionary algorithms with a case-based, memory
Fred G (1989) Tabu search part i. ORSA J Comput 1(3):190–206
Jin Y, Branke J (2005) Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments—a survey. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 9(3):303–317
Karaman A, Uyar S, Eryigit G (2005) The memory indexing evolutionary algorithm for dynamic environments. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3449. Heidelberg, D-69121, Germany, pp 563–573
Kennedy J, Mendes R (2002) Population structure and particle swarm performance. In: The 2002 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1671–1675
Lee SK, Moon BR (2009) Genetic algorithm with adaptive elitism-based immigrants for dynamic optimization problems. In: The 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, Montreal, pp 1865–1866
Li X (2004) Adaptively choosing neighbourhood bests using species in a particle swarm optimizer for multimodal function optimization. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp 105–116
Li X, Branke J, Blackwell T (2006) Particle swarm with speciation and adaptation in a dynamic environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Li C, Yang S, Nguyen TT, Yu EL, Yao X, Jin Y, Beyer HG, Suganthan PN (2008) Benchmark generator for cec 2009 competition on dynamic optimization. Department of Computer Science, University of Leicester, Technical report, UK
Liu L, Yang S, Wang D (2010) Particle swarm optimization with composite particles in dynamic environments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B 40(6):1634–1648
Mostaghim S, Teich J, Tyagi A (2002) Comparison of data structures for storing pareto-sets in moeas. CEC ’02 1:843–848
Nguyen TT, Yang Z, Bonsall S (2012a) Dynamic time-linkage problems—the challenges. In: 2012 9th IEEE RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, Research, Innovation, and Vision, Ho Chi Minh City
Nguyen TT, Yang S, Branke J (2012b) Evolutionary dynamic optimization: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol Comput 6:1–24
Parrott D, Li X (2006) Locating and tracking multiple dynamic optima by a particle swarm model using speciation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(4):440–458
Ramsey CL, Grefenstette JJ (1993) Case-based initialization of genetic algorithms. In: the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 84–91
Richter H, Yang S (2009) Learning behavior in abstract memory schemes for dynamic optimization problems. Soft Comput 13(12):1163–1173
Salomon R (1996) Re-evaluating genetic algorithm performance under coordinate rotation of benchmark functions. A survey of some theoretical and practical aspects of genetic algorithms. Biosystems 39(3):263–278
Schütze O (2003) A new data structure for the nondominance problem in multi-objective, Optimization
Simöes A, Costa E (2007a) Improving memory’s usage in evolutionary algorithms for changing environments. In: The 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Singapore, pp 276–283
Simöes A, Costa E (2007b) Variable-size memory evolutionary algorithm to deal with dynamic environments. In: Applications of evolutionary computing, vol. 4448. Springer, Berlin, pp 617–626
Tinós R, Yang S (2007) A self-organizing random immigrants genetic algorithm for dynamic optimization problems. Gen Progr Evolv Mach 8(3):255–286
Urbanowicz RJ, Moore JH (2009) Learning classifier systems: a complete introduction, review, and roadmap. J Artif Evol Appl 2009
Ursem RK (2000) Multinational gas: multimodal optimization techniques in dynamic environments. In: The 2000 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, vol. 1, Riviera Hotel, Las Vegas, pp 19–26
Uyar AS, Harmanci AE (2005) A new population based adaptive domination change mechanism for diploid genetic algorithms in dynamic environments. Soft Comput 9(11):803–814
Vavak F, Fogarty TC, Jukes K (1996) A genetic algorithm with variable range of local search for tracking changing environments. In: Parallel Problem Solving from, Nature, pp 376–385
Vavak F, Jukes K, Fogarty TC (1997) Learning the local search range for genetic optimisation in nonstationary environments. In: IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 355–360
Yang S (2003) Non-stationary problem optimization using the primal-dual genetic algorithm. In: the 2003 IEEE Congress On Evolutionary Computation, vol 3, pp 2246–2253
Yang S (2005) Memory-based immigrants for genetic algorithms in dynamic environments. In: The 2005 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, vol 2, Washington, pp 1115–1122
Yang S (2007) Genetic algorithms with elitism-based immigrants for chaning optimization problems. In: EvoWorkshops 2007: applications of evolutionary, computing, vol 4448, pp 627–636
Yang S, Tinós R (2007) A hybrid immigrants scheme for genetic algorithms in dynamic environments. Intern J Autom Comput 4(3):243–254
Yang S (2008) Genetic algorithms with memory- and elitism-based immigrants in dynamic environments. Evol Comput 16(3):385–416
Yang S, Yao X (2008) Population-based incremental learning with associative memory for dynamic environments. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(5):542–561
Yang S, Li C (2010) A clustering particle swarm optimizer for locating and tracking multiple optima in dynamic environments. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14(6):959–974
Yu EL, Suganthan PN (2009) Evolutionary programming with ensemble of explicit memories for dynamic optimization. In: The 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Trondheim, pp 431–438
Yuen SY, Chow CK (2009) A genetic algorithm that adaptively mutates and never revisits. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(2):454–472
Zhu T, Luo W, Li Z (2011) An adaptive strategy for updating the memory in evolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments, Paris
Acknowledgments
This work is partly supported by the 2006-2007 Excellent Young and Middle-aged Academic Leader Development Program of Anhui Province Research Experiment Bases. We would like to thank Dr. Stefan Bird and Dr. Changhe Li for the source codes of SPSO and CPSO, respectively. We also would like to express our great appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which contribute a lot to the improvement of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Castiglione.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, T., Luo, W. & Yue, L. Dynamic optimization facilitated by the memory tree. Soft Comput 19, 547–566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1273-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1273-1