Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of non-redundant objective sets based on the spatial similarity ratio

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization is a challenging task in many disciplines. Although a number of algorithms have simplified this problem by degenerating redundant objectives into low-dimensional sets, there is currently no consensus method for evaluating their performance. In this paper, we propose an evaluation method that uses a spatial similarity ratio (SSR) to determine the quality of non-redundant objective sets (NRSs). We consider the reduction of all NRSs of three functions from 5D to 2D or 3D using our SSR-based method, and compare the results to those given by an inverted generational distance-based method. The results demonstrate that our method is more accurate, as it takes information from both the non-redundant and redundant objective sets into consideration. In addition, using the proposed SSR-based approach, no prior knowledge of the true Pareto set is required. Therefore, we can conclude that our SSR-based method is feasible for the assessment of non-redundant objective sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brockhoff D, Zitzler E (2007) Dimensionality reduction in multiobjective optimization: the minimum objective subset problem. Oper Res Proc 2006:423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff D, Zitzler E (2009) Objective reduction in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: theory and applications. Evol Comput 17(2):135–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff D, Zitzler E (2006) Are all objectives necessary? On dimensionality reduction in evolutionary multiobjective pptimization. In: 9th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature-PPSN IX, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 533–542

  • Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Veldhuizen DAV (2007) Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2013) Two approaches for single and multi-objective dynamic optimization. Metaheuristics Dyn Optim 433:99–116

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Saxena DK (2005) On finding pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems. Kangal Rep 200511:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Saxena DK (2006) Searching for Pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In: 2006 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Vancouver, Canada, pp 3353–3360

  • di Pierro F (2006) Many-objective evolutionary algorithms and applications to water resources engineering. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, University of Exeter, Devon, UK

  • Jaimes AL (2011) Techniques to deal with many-objective optimization problems using evolutionary algorithms. Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute

  • Laumanns M, Thiele L, Deb K, Zitzler E (2002) Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evol Comput 10(3):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Motoda H, Setiono R, Zhao Z (2010) Feature selection: an ever evolving frontier in data mining. In: 4th workshop on feature selection in Data Mining. Hyderabad, India, pp 4–13

  • López Jaimes A, Coello Coello CA, Chakraborty D (2008) Objective reduction using a feature selection technique. In: 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 673–680

  • Saxena DK, Deb K (2008) Dimensionality reduction of objectives and constraints in multi-objective optimization problems: a system design perspective’. In: 2008 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Hong Kong, China, pp 3204–3211

  • Saxena DK, Deb K (2007) Non-linear dimensionality reduction procedures for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems: employing correntropy and a novel maximum variance unfolding. Evol Multi-Criterion Optim 4403:772–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seah C-W, Ong Y-S, Tsang I-W, Jiang S (2012) Pareto rank learning in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: 2012 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Brisbane, Australia, pp 1–8

  • Yuan Y, Yuan J, Du H, Li L (2012) An improved multi-objective ant colony algorithm for building life cycle energy consumption optimisation. Int J Comput Appl Technol 43(1):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the support of the Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2014GK3027), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61379062, 61372049), the Science Research Project of the Education Office of Hunan Province (Grant No. 12A135, 12C0378), the Hunan Province Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 14JJ2072, 13JJ8006), the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate (Grant No. CX2013A011), and the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhua Zheng.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, J., Zheng, J., Deng, C. et al. An evaluation of non-redundant objective sets based on the spatial similarity ratio. Soft Comput 19, 2275–2286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1409-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1409-3

Keywords

Navigation