Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positioning–pricing problem of heterogeneous duopoly with uncertain consumer preferences

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small- and medium-sized firms in China have competed passively with advantaged enterprises since 2000, and the prosperity indexes have always been in the recession. This paper aims to find the optimal positioning–pricing strategies for disadvantaged small- and medium-sized firms and explore the complex influence of consumer preference uncertainty in the optimal strategies in duopoly market. In order to do so, the classic Hotelling model is modified to be a heterogeneous duopoly game model under consumer preference uncertainty. By using the backward recurrence algorithm, we first get the optimal equilibrium and then figure out the expected equilibrium solution through mathematical expectation method. The computational results show that disadvantaged enterprises could survive themselves in fierce competition as long as they choose appropriate strategies. In addition, consumer preference uncertainty plays a significant role in affecting the optimal strategy decisions of positioning and pricing in duopoly since producers can hardly obtain complete and perfect information about the market. Specifically, the increased uncertainty of consumer preference generally raises the expected equilibrium price and profit of duopoly enterprises. However, the expected equilibrium profit of the advantaged enterprise in a duopoly decreases with consumer preference uncertainty increasing under certain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hotelling assumed the firms producing a homogeneous good at a constant and equal marginal cost.

  2. The unit cost c in this paper can be regarded as the enterprise’s “location cost”, similarly the cost to achieve specific positioning.

  3. In this paper, product quality level is reflected on the failure rate. Specifically, the lower failure rate, the higher level of product quality.

References

  • Aguirre I, Arroyuelos AMM (2001) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy: the role of the pricing game rules. Econ Bull 12(2):1–7

  • Anderson EG, Parker GG (2002) Project sourcing decisions in the presence of learning costs [C]. University of Texas Austin, Working paper

  • Anderson SP, Palma D, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete choice theory of product differentiation Cambridge. The MIT Press, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian S, Bhardwaj P (2004) When not all conflict is bad: manufacturing-marketing conflict and strategic incentive design. Manag Sci 50(4):489–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Khosla I, Sinha KK et al (1998) Quality and competition. Manag Sci 44(9):1179–1192

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F, Manceau D (1999) Persuasive advertising in Hotelling’s model of product differentiation. Int J Ind Org 17(4):557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Riordan MH (2007) Price and variety in the spokes model. Econ J 117(522):897–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi WC-Y (2007) Quality choice and the coase problem. Econ Lett 64(1):107–115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coibion O, Einav L, Hallak JC et al (2007) Equilibrium demand elasticities across quality segments. Int J Ind Org 25(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’aspremont A, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On hotellings “stability” in competition. Econometrica 47(5):1145–1150

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diao XJ, Yang DL, Ren YW (2009) Extended Hotelling model-based firms’ competitive strategies [J]. Chin J Manage 6(7): 867–872

  • Economides N (1999) Quality choice and vertical integration. Int J Ind Org 17(6):903–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eston BC, Lipsey RG (1975) The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Rev Econ Stud 42(1):27–49

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J (2010) Principle of minimum differentiation or that of maximum differentiation—on the hotelling model and its development. Rev Ind Econ 9(2):27–46

  • Gronroos C (1983) Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, Report. pp 83-104

  • Gu F, Huang PQ, Zhou DS (2002) Strategy of minimum product differentiation under heterogeneity. J Syst Eng 17(5):467–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter JF (1997) Hotelling’s competition with demand location uncertainty. Int J Ind Org 15(3):327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar US, Pitbladdo RC (1997) Quality, class, and competition. Manag Sci 43(1):27–39

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Chhajed D (2002) Product design with multiple quality-type attributes. Manag Sci 48(11):1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Serfes K (2005) Imperfect price discrimination in a vertical differentiation model. Int J Ind Org 23(5–6):341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Fan X, Wu J (2005) Research on the reason of price competition in quick-frozen food industry with price-quality value model. Issues Agric Econ S1:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi N (2007) Price and quality competition: the effect of differentiation and vertical integration. Eur J Oper Res 180(2):907–921

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi N, Yamada Y (2008) A note on price and quality competition between asymmetric firms. Eur J Oper Res 187(2):571–581

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Netz JS, Taylor BA (2002) Maximum or minimum differentiation? Location patterns of retail outlets. Rev Econ Stat 84(1):162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee BD (1996) Consumer heterogeneity and strategic quality decisions. Manag Sci 42(2):157–172

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald B, Lázló S (1996) Location in the Hotelling duopoly model with demand uncertainty. Eur Econ Rev 40(7):1453–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salop SC (1979) Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J Econ 10(1):141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer G, Zhang ZJ (2002) Competitive one-to-one promotions. Manag Sci 48(9):1143–1160

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Tian P, Zhao L (2013) Consumer heterogeneity and pricing strategies: a quality-price competition model. J Syst Manag 22(3):349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Syam NB, Ruan R, Hess JD et al (2005) Customized products: a competitive analysis. Mark Sci 24(4):569–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takatoshi T, Thisse JF (1995) Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition. Int J Ind Org 13(2):213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Liang L, Fu Y et al (2006) The analysis of multi-product quality difference discrimination and the optimal quality and pricing strategy under single monopolistic manufacturer. Syst Eng Theory Pract 1:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Cai S, Tang Y (2006) Study of customer utility and enterprise profit based on quality information asymmetry degree. Chin J Manag Sci 14(1):88–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (NSSFC) Grant Number 14AZD130. The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Yun Yao, Hua Zhao, Yin Chen, Deng Xu & Yong Long

Authors
  1. Yun Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hua Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deng Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yong Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Long.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Y. Ni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Zhao, H., Chen, Y. et al. Positioning–pricing problem of heterogeneous duopoly with uncertain consumer preferences. Soft Comput 22, 5775–5782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2643-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2643-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation