Skip to main content
Log in

Water security evaluation based on the TODIM method with probabilistic linguistic term sets

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, water security is becoming increasingly prominent and the water security problem becomes a primary bottleneck restricting China’s future sustainable development. Water security in China is thus worth conducting an in-depth study. This paper aims to explore an effective water security evaluation method. Based on the proposed definition of water security, an evaluation index system of water security is first built from the perspective of “pressure–state–response” conceptual model. Considering the indicators’ uncertainty and the decision makers’ (DMs’) limited knowledge, the DMs usually use linguistic terms to express their judgements. As a new type of linguistic variable, probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) not only allows the DMs to express their judgements with multiple linguistic terms but also can reflect the DMs’ different preference degrees over these possible linguistic terms. For the water security issue under probabilistic linguistic environment, a programming model is developed to derive the attribute weights. Then, the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese for interactive multi-criteria decision making) method, which considers the psychological factors of the DMs, is used to evaluate water security based on the PLTS. Furthermore, a case study is conducted and some discussions and comparative analysis are carried out according to the case results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker K (2012) Water security: research challenges and opportunities. Science 337:914–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YT, Liu HL, Bao AM, Chen X, Wang L (2015) Evaluation of urban water resource security under urban expansion using a system dynamics model. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 15:1259–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook C, Bakker K (2012) Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Glob Environ Change 22:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai WY, Zhang R, Cheng ZY et al (2015) Research on water ecological security index system in Lanzhou based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Arid Zone Res 4:025

    Google Scholar 

  • French S, Hartley R, Thomas LC, White DJ (1983) Multi-objective decision making: based on the proceedings of a conference on multi-objective decision making. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak AK, House-Peters L, Varady RG, Scott CA (2018) Water security: a review of place-based research. Environ Sci Policy 82:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership (2000) Towards water security: a framework for action. Global Water Partnership (GWP), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Jin CL (2014) Urban water security evaluation system based on water poverty index. J Hydroelectr Eng 33:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Jin CL, Li YX, Zhou ZL (2017) A novel water poverty index model for evaluation of Chinese regional water security. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/82/1/012029

  • Han BL, Liu HX, Wang RS (2015) Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods. Ecol Model 318:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y (2015) China’s water security: current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environ Sci Policy 54:106–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang YP, Liang X, Liang HM (2017) An I-TODIM method for multi-attribute decision making with interval numbers. Soft Comput 21:5489–5506

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–292

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li CH, Sun L, Jia JX, Cai YP, Wang X (2016) Risk assessment of water pollution sources based on an integrated k-means clustering and set pair analysis method in the region of Shiyan. China Sci Total Environ 557:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DL, Wu SY, Liu LB, Liang Z, Li SC (2017) Evaluating regional water security through a freshwater ecosystem service flow model: a case study in Beijing-Tianjian-Hebei region. China Ecol Indic 81:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl Based Syst 76:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KK, Li CH, Cai YP, Xu M, Xia XH (2014) Comprehensive evaluation of water resources security in the Yellow River basin based on a fuzzy multi-attribute decision analysis approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1605–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu SB, Bao HJ, Pan HL (2016) Urban water security evaluation based on similarity measure model of vague sets. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:15944–15950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Jiang SZ, Zheng YR, Chang TT, Peng WF (2016) Application of water poverty index based on the entropy weight method to water security evaluation of Sichuan Province. J Sichuan Normal Univ (Nat Sci) 4:029

    Google Scholar 

  • Men BH, Liu HY (2018) Water resource system vulnerability assessment of the Heihe River Basin based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model under the changing environment. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang Q, Xu ZS, Wang H (2016) Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao DG, Yang FS, Xiao C, Tan XZ (2012) Evaluation of water security: an integrated approach applied in Wuhan urban agglomeration. China Water Sci Technol 66:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa BR, Ishidaira H, Pandey VP, Bhandari TM, Shakya NM (2018) Evaluation of water security in kathmandu valley before and after water transfer from another Basin. Water 10:224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veettil AV, Mishra AK (2016) Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts. J Hydrol 542:589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei RJ, Liang C, Ren C, Zhao L (2013) Variable fuzzy recognition method of water resources security evaluation in Songhua Dam. South North Water Transf Water Sci Technol 11:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2012) Linguistic decision making: theory and methods. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yao JP, Ren YT, Wei S, Pei W (2018) Assessing the complex adaptability of regional water security systems based on a unified co-evolutionary model. J Hydroinf 20:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin S, Guan DJ, Su WC, Gao WJ (2017) Integrated assessment and scenarios simulation of urban water security system in the southwest of China with system dynamics analysis. Water Sci Technol 76:2255–2267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu HZ, Han M (2015) TOPSIS evaluation of water resource security in Shandong Province based on fuzzy matter-element model. Saf Environ Eng 6:001

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–I. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Wang LC (2015) Assessment of water resource security in Chongqing City of China: what has been done and what remains to be done? Nat Hazards 75:2751–2772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Wang H, Liao HC (2016) Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 49:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeshui Xu.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71571123, 71771155, 71501135, 71771156), the Young scholars high level academic team construction project at Sichuan University (skgt201501), and the Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars at SCU (No. 2016SCU04A23).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Xu, Z. & Liao, H. Water security evaluation based on the TODIM method with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Soft Comput 23, 6215–6230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3276-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3276-9

Keywords

Navigation