Abstract
This paper constructs a project portfolio selection model from the strategic perspective. Two goals are proposed for the portfolio to achieve, i.e., strategic contributions and financial returns. The uncertainties involved are addressed with fuzzy real options. Then, a modified multi-objective genetic algorithm is designed to determine the portfolios. Finally, a real case is provided to validate the model’s effectiveness. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can optimize two objectives simultaneously and keep the plausible Pareto-optimal set which wins over the single-objective model solutions in achieving the shared value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbassi M, Ashrafi M, Sharifi Tashnizi E (2014) Selecting balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interdependencies: a cross-entropy based methodology. Technovation 34(1):54–63
Alves MJ, Almeida M (2007) MOTGA: a multiobjective Tchebycheff based genetic algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem. Comput Oper Res 34(11):3458–3470
Arratia MNM, López IF, Schaeffer SE, Cruz-Reyes L (2016) Static R&D project portfolio selection in public organizations. Decis Support Syst 84:53–63
Bednyagin D, Gnansounou E (2011) Real options valuation of fusion energy R&D programme. Energy Policy 39(1):116–130
Bhattacharyya R, Kumar P, Kar S (2011) Fuzzy R&D portfolio selection of interdependent projects. Comput Math Appl 62(10):3857–3870
Birgisson I (2012) Project portfolio management in new product development organizations application of accepted PPM theories in practice (master’s thesis), Chalmers University of technology
Chiang IR, Nunez MA (2013) Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios. Inf Technol Manag 14(2):143–157
Chiranjit Changdar, Mahapatra GS, Pal Rajat Kumar (2015) An improved genetic algorithm based approach to solve constrained knapsack problem in fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):2276–2286
Cruz-Reyes L, Fernandez E, Sanchez P, Coello Coello CA, Gomez C (2017) Incorporation of implicit decision-maker preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimization using a multi-criteria classification method. Appl Soft Comput J 50:48–57
De Oliveira LL, Freitas AA, Tinós R (2018) Multi-objective genetic algorithms in the study of the genetic code’s adaptability. Inf Sci 425:48–61
De Reyck B, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lockett M, Calderini SR, Moura M, Sloper A (2005) The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. Int J Proj Manag 23(7):524–537
Hassanzadeh F, Collan M, Modarres M (2012) A practical approach to R&D portfolio selection using the fuzzy pay-off method. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(4):615–622
Kalashnikov V, Benita F, López-Ramos F, Hernández-Luna A (2017) Bi-objective project portfolio selection in Lean Six Sigma. Int J Prod Econ 186:81–88
Karsak E (2006) A generalized fuzzy optimization framework for R&D project selection using real options valuation. In: Computational science and its applications-ICCSA, pp 918–927
Khalili-Damghani K, Sadi-Nezhad S, Lotfi FH, Tavana M (2013) A hybrid fuzzy rule-based multi-criteria framework for sustainable project portfolio selection. Inf Sci 220:442–462
Li D, Gu H, Zhang L (2013) A hybrid genetic algorithm-fuzzy c -means approach for incomplete data clustering based on nearest-neighbor intervals. Soft Comput 17(10):1787–1796
Liesiö J, Salo A (2012) Scenario-based portfolio selection of investment projects with incomplete probability and utility information. Eur J Oper Res 217(1):162–172
Lin FT (2008) Solving the knapsack problem with imprecise weight coefficients using genetic algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):133–145
Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2015) A new optimization model for project portfolio selection under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Arab J Sci Eng 40(11):3351–3361
Nassif LN, Filho JCS, Nogueira JM (2013) Project portfolio selection in public administration using fuzzy logic. Proc Soc Behav Sci 74:41–50
Perez-Escobedo JL, Azzaro-Pantel C, Pibouleau L (2012) Multiobjective strategies for New Product Development in the pharmaceutical industry. Comput Chem Eng 37:278–296
Piroozfard H, Wong KY, Wong WP (2018) Minimizing total carbon footprint and total late work criterion in flexible job shop scheduling by using an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:267–283
Relich M, Pawlewski P (2017) A fuzzy weighted average approach for selecting portfolio of new product development projects. Neurocomputing 231:19–27
Shu L, Jiang P, Zhou Q, Shao X, Hu J, Meng X (2018) An on-line variable fidelity metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for engineering design optimization. Appl Soft Comput 66:438–448
Tolga AÇ (2012) A real options approach for software development projects using fuzzy electre. J Mult Valued Logic Soft Comput 18:541–560
Wang J, Wang J, Hwang W (2007) A fuzzy set approach for R & D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model A fuzzy set approach for R & D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega 35:247–257
Wang Q, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2011) Fuzzy real options for risky project evaluation using least squares Monte-Carlo simulation. IEEE Syst J 5(3):385–395
Xu XF, Zhang W, Li N, Xu HL (2015) A bi-level programming model of resource matching for collaborative logistics network in supply uncertainty environment. J Frankl Inst 352:3873–3884
Xu XF, Hao J, Deng YR, Wang Y (2017) Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 560(7):684–691
Yan S, Ji X (2017) Portfolio selection model of oil projects under uncertain environment. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2619-2
Yassine AA, Mostafa O, Browning TR (2017) Scheduling multiple, resource-constrained, iterative, product development projects with genetic algorithms. Comput Ind Eng 107:39–56
You CJ, Lee CKM, Chen SL, Jiao RJ (2012) A real option theoretic fuzzy evaluation model for enterprise resource planning investment. J Eng Technol Manag JET-M 29(1):47–61
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71172123), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015JM7382), Social Science Foundation in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015R005), Soft Science Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015KRM039).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Communicated by X. Li.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Wang, L., Li, S. et al. Balancing strategic contributions and financial returns: a project portfolio selection model under uncertainty. Soft Comput 22, 5547–5559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3294-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3294-7