Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Balancing strategic contributions and financial returns: a project portfolio selection model under uncertainty

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper constructs a project portfolio selection model from the strategic perspective. Two goals are proposed for the portfolio to achieve, i.e., strategic contributions and financial returns. The uncertainties involved are addressed with fuzzy real options. Then, a modified multi-objective genetic algorithm is designed to determine the portfolios. Finally, a real case is provided to validate the model’s effectiveness. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can optimize two objectives simultaneously and keep the plausible Pareto-optimal set which wins over the single-objective model solutions in achieving the shared value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbassi M, Ashrafi M, Sharifi Tashnizi E (2014) Selecting balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interdependencies: a cross-entropy based methodology. Technovation 34(1):54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves MJ, Almeida M (2007) MOTGA: a multiobjective Tchebycheff based genetic algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem. Comput Oper Res 34(11):3458–3470

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arratia MNM, López IF, Schaeffer SE, Cruz-Reyes L (2016) Static R&D project portfolio selection in public organizations. Decis Support Syst 84:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednyagin D, Gnansounou E (2011) Real options valuation of fusion energy R&D programme. Energy Policy 39(1):116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya R, Kumar P, Kar S (2011) Fuzzy R&D portfolio selection of interdependent projects. Comput Math Appl 62(10):3857–3870

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Birgisson I (2012) Project portfolio management in new product development organizations application of accepted PPM theories in practice (master’s thesis), Chalmers University of technology

  • Chiang IR, Nunez MA (2013) Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios. Inf Technol Manag 14(2):143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiranjit Changdar, Mahapatra GS, Pal Rajat Kumar (2015) An improved genetic algorithm based approach to solve constrained knapsack problem in fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):2276–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Reyes L, Fernandez E, Sanchez P, Coello Coello CA, Gomez C (2017) Incorporation of implicit decision-maker preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimization using a multi-criteria classification method. Appl Soft Comput J 50:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira LL, Freitas AA, Tinós R (2018) Multi-objective genetic algorithms in the study of the genetic code’s adaptability. Inf Sci 425:48–61

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • De Reyck B, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lockett M, Calderini SR, Moura M, Sloper A (2005) The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. Int J Proj Manag 23(7):524–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh F, Collan M, Modarres M (2012) A practical approach to R&D portfolio selection using the fuzzy pay-off method. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(4):615–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalashnikov V, Benita F, López-Ramos F, Hernández-Luna A (2017) Bi-objective project portfolio selection in Lean Six Sigma. Int J Prod Econ 186:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak E (2006) A generalized fuzzy optimization framework for R&D project selection using real options valuation. In: Computational science and its applications-ICCSA, pp 918–927

  • Khalili-Damghani K, Sadi-Nezhad S, Lotfi FH, Tavana M (2013) A hybrid fuzzy rule-based multi-criteria framework for sustainable project portfolio selection. Inf Sci 220:442–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Gu H, Zhang L (2013) A hybrid genetic algorithm-fuzzy c -means approach for incomplete data clustering based on nearest-neighbor intervals. Soft Comput 17(10):1787–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesiö J, Salo A (2012) Scenario-based portfolio selection of investment projects with incomplete probability and utility information. Eur J Oper Res 217(1):162–172

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin FT (2008) Solving the knapsack problem with imprecise weight coefficients using genetic algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):133–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2015) A new optimization model for project portfolio selection under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Arab J Sci Eng 40(11):3351–3361

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nassif LN, Filho JCS, Nogueira JM (2013) Project portfolio selection in public administration using fuzzy logic. Proc Soc Behav Sci 74:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Escobedo JL, Azzaro-Pantel C, Pibouleau L (2012) Multiobjective strategies for New Product Development in the pharmaceutical industry. Comput Chem Eng 37:278–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piroozfard H, Wong KY, Wong WP (2018) Minimizing total carbon footprint and total late work criterion in flexible job shop scheduling by using an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relich M, Pawlewski P (2017) A fuzzy weighted average approach for selecting portfolio of new product development projects. Neurocomputing 231:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu L, Jiang P, Zhou Q, Shao X, Hu J, Meng X (2018) An on-line variable fidelity metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for engineering design optimization. Appl Soft Comput 66:438–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolga AÇ (2012) A real options approach for software development projects using fuzzy electre. J Mult Valued Logic Soft Comput 18:541–560

  • Wang J, Wang J, Hwang W (2007) A fuzzy set approach for R & D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model A fuzzy set approach for R & D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega 35:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2011) Fuzzy real options for risky project evaluation using least squares Monte-Carlo simulation. IEEE Syst J 5(3):385–395

  • Xu XF, Zhang W, Li N, Xu HL (2015) A bi-level programming model of resource matching for collaborative logistics network in supply uncertainty environment. J Frankl Inst 352:3873–3884

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XF, Hao J, Deng YR, Wang Y (2017) Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 560(7):684–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan S, Ji X (2017) Portfolio selection model of oil projects under uncertain environment. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2619-2

  • Yassine AA, Mostafa O, Browning TR (2017) Scheduling multiple, resource-constrained, iterative, product development projects with genetic algorithms. Comput Ind Eng 107:39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You CJ, Lee CKM, Chen SL, Jiao RJ (2012) A real option theoretic fuzzy evaluation model for enterprise resource planning investment. J Eng Technol Manag JET-M 29(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71172123), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015JM7382), Social Science Foundation in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015R005), Soft Science Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2015KRM039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by X. Li.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Wang, L., Li, S. et al. Balancing strategic contributions and financial returns: a project portfolio selection model under uncertainty. Soft Comput 22, 5547–5559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3294-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3294-7

Keywords

Navigation