Abstract
Recent years has seen Chinese enterprises competing to broaden the scope of business through the internationalization strategy. The proliferation of the strategy is attributable to the favorable environment created by the Chinese government with the increasingly stringent requirements on corporate social responsibility. The external pressure of social responsibility has also stimulated the fulfillment of social responsibility within the enterprises. Against this backdrop, this paper constructs a mathematical model with the constraint of external social responsibility pressure and applies the model to examine the effect of the internationalization strategy of Chinese enterprises on enterprise value. The research finds that: First, the internationalization strategy enhances the enterprise value; the stakeholders will jointly promote the strategy once they are aware of its significance. Second, with the increase in the external pressure of social responsibility, the enterprises will promote enterprise value through the implementation of social responsibility. Third, the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility contributes to the proliferation of internationalization strategy and further enhances the long-term enterprise value. These modeling conclusions are validated through an empirical test. This research enriches the exploration into the internationalization strategy of enterprises in emerging markets and pioneers the study on the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility from the external angle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buckley PJ, Casson MC (2009) The internalization theory of the multinational enterprise: a review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1563–1580
Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc Rev 38(3):268–295
Chih HL, Chih HH, Chen TY (2010) On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: international evidence on the financial industry. J Bus Ethics 93(1):115–135
Collins JM (1990) A market performance comparison of U.S. firms active in domestic developed and developing countries. J Int Bus Stud 21(2):271–287
Duru A, Reeb DM (2002) International diversification and analysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. Account Rev 77(2):415–433
Gugler P, Shi J (2009) Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: lost war in pertaining global competitiveness. J Bus Ethics 87(1):3–24
Liu B, Wang XF, Li JM (2007) Model analysis of implementing corporate social responsibility strategic innovations. Sci Technol Prog Policy 24(4):111–115
Marano V, Kostova T (2016) Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practice in multinational enterprise. J Manag Stud 53(1):18–54
Marano V, Tashman P, Kostova T (2017) Escaping the iron cage: liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprise. J Int Bus Stud 48(3):386–408
Martin D, Sayrak A (2003) Corporate diversification and shareholder value: a survey of recent literature. J Corp Finance 9(1):37–57
Mittoo UR, Zhang Z (2008) The capital structure of multinational corporations: Canadian versus U.S. evidence. J Corp Finance 14(5):706–720
Qi WH, Liu YJ (2013) Analysis on social responsibility regulation of food enterprise based on principal-agent model. Sci Technol Econ 26(5):101–105
Sun WF, Huang ZH (2014) International diversification, industrial diversification and corporation innovation input. R&D Manag 26(1):52–62
Sun WF, Sun HP (2014) International diversification, agency cost and capital structure: empirical evidence from chinese listing corporations. Syst Eng Theory Pract 34(1):2556–2564
Vallentin S (2015) Governmentalities of CSR: Danish government policy as a reflection of political difference. J Bus Ethics 127(1):33–47
Wang JJ (2005) The study of constraint condition on corporate social responsibility. Technol Econ 23(3):30–33
Wang XL, Fan G, Ma GR (2017) Business environment index for China’s provinces 2017 report. Social Sciences Academic Press(CHINA), Beijing
Wei F, Chen LR (2011) Industrial diversification, geographic diversification and corporate performance. J Shanxi Finance Econ Univ 33(9):83–89
Yan HF, Wang J, Wu B, Wu QQ (2017) The influence of host country institutional quality and mark size on corporate social responsibility of emerging market multinationals. Luojia Manag Rev 23(4):29–43
Yang B, Chen W, Lin C, Song L (2016) Analysis on the cultural conflict strategy of chinese enterprises’ transnational operation under the strategy of ‘the belt and road initiative’. Manag World 32(9):174–175
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (Project No. 16XJY014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by Y. Ni.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, B., Lin, C. & Ren, C. Internationalization strategy, social responsibility pressure and enterprise value. Soft Comput 24, 2487–2494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3425-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3425-1