Skip to main content
Log in

A fuzzified Pareto multiobjective cuckoo search algorithm for power losses minimization incorporating SVC

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an application of multiobjective cuckoo search (MOCS) algorithm for reduction in transmission line losses by placing static VAR compensator (SVC) at an optimal location. MOCS algorithm is an extension of the infamous cuckoo search algorithm. The multiobjective optimizations considered in this paper include active power loss and reactive power loss, active power loss and investment cost of SVC. The Pareto-optimal solution which is obtained by using the Pareto-optimal method gives the solution to the multiobjective problem. The fuzzy logic approach is used to obtain best trade-off solutions from the Pareto-optimal solution. A standard IEEE 30 bus test system is considered for testing the efficacy of the proposed methodology. The results show that installation of SVC and application of MOCS algorithm is effective in power loss reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel Moamen MA, Narayana Prasad P (2003) Power flow control and transmission loss minimization model with TCSC for practical power networks. In: IEEE power engineering society general meeting, Toronto, Canada, pp 880–884

  • Ambriz Perez H, Acha E, Fuerte Esquivel CR (2000) Advanced SVC models for Newton–Raphson load flow and newton optimal power flow studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civicioglu P, Besdok E (2013) A conceptual comparison of the cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution and artificial bee colony algorithms. Artif Intell Rev 39(4):315–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbex S, Cherkaoui R, Germond AJ (2001) Optimal location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(3):537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L (2000) Understanding FACTS: concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission Systems. IEEE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Idris RM, Khairuddin A, Mustafa MW (2009) Optimal allocation of FACTS devices for ATC enhancement using bees algorithm. In: IEEE power engineering conference, Adelaide, Australia pp 313–320

  • Kumar Pradeep, Kumar Niranjan, Akella Ashok Kumar (2016) Comparative analysis of voltage and current source inverter based DSTATCOM systems. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 24(5):3838–3851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Li MS, Tang WJ, Wu QH (2007) Optimal location of FACTS devices by a bacterial swarming algorithm for reactive power planning. In: IEEE evolutionary computation, Singapore, pp 2344–2349

  • Mahdad Belkacem, Srairi Kamel (2014) Optimal location and control of combined SVC–TCSC controller to enhance power system loadability. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5(3):427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani Sankar M, Seksena SBL (2017) A cost effective voltage sag compensator for distribution system. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(1):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlyukevich I (2007) Levy flights, non-local search and simulated annealing. J Comput Phys 226(2):1830–1844

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan M, Slochanal SMR, Venkatesh P, Prince Stephen Abraham J (2007) Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electr Pow Syst Res 77(3–4):276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen Husam I, Rashed Ghamgeen I, Cheng SJ (2011) Optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC for enhancing power system security based on differential evolution algorithm. Int J Electr Power 33(1):94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solmaz K, Amin MH, Hazlie Bin M (2015) Comparative study of multi-objective optimal power flow based on particle swarm, evolutionary programming, and genetic algorithm. Electr Eng 97(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan GM, Raposo EP, da Luz MGE (2008) Lévy flights and super diffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches. Phys Life Rev 5(3):133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via l´evy flights. In: IEEE world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing, Coimbatore, India, pp 210–214

  • Yang XS, Deb S (2010) Engineering optimization by cuckoo search. Int J Math Model Numer Optim 1(4):330–343

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS, Deb S (2011) Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization. Comput Oper Res 40(6):1616–1624

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mani Sankar Matta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nartu, T.R., Matta, M.S., Koratana, S. et al. A fuzzified Pareto multiobjective cuckoo search algorithm for power losses minimization incorporating SVC. Soft Comput 23, 10811–10820 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3634-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3634-7

Keywords

Navigation