Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidential model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the uncertainty existing in real-world, intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) are used to model uncertain information in multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM). The intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM problems have gained great popularity recently. But, most of the current methods depend on various aggregation operators that may provide unreasonable collective intuitionistic fuzzy values of alternatives to be ranked. To solve such problem, a new method is developed based on evidence theory and IFSs. First, the mathematical relation between IFSs and evidence theory is analyzed, followed by the transformation from intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation information to basic belief assignment in evidence theory. Then, a new intuitionistic fuzzy weighted evidential (IFWE) average operator is introduced based on the operation of evidence discounting and evidence combination rule. We also develop a possibility-based ranking method for intuitionistic fuzzy values (IFVs) to obtain the linear ordering of IFVs. The proposed evidential model uses the IFWE average operator to aggregate the decision matrix and the attribute weight that is given by each decision maker, based on which each decision maker’s aggregated decision matrix can be obtained. Based on the decision matrices of all decision makers and the weights of the decision makers, the aggregated intuitionistic fuzzy value of each alternative can be obtained by the IFWE average operator. Finally, the preference order of all alternatives can be obtained by the possibility-based ranking method. Comparative analysis based on several application examples of MAGDM demonstrates that the proposed method can overcome the drawbacks of existing methods for MAGDM in intuitionistic fuzzy environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications. Springer, Heildelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Bustince H, Goswami DP, Mukherjee UK, Pal NR (2011) On averaging operators for Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:1116–1124

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boran FE (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11363–11368

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Burillo P (1996) Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):403–405

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chai J, Liu JNK (2010) A novel multicriteria group decision making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy SIR method. In: Proceedings of the 2010 World Automation Congress, Kobe, Japan

  • Chen SM, Tan JM (1994) Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 67:163–172

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Cheng SH, Chiou CH (2015) A new method for fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Guangzhou, China

  • Chen SM, Cheng SH, Chiou CH (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf Fusion 27:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple valued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38:325–339

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Facchinetti G, Ricci R, Muzzioli S (1998) Note on ranking fuzzy triangular numbers. Int J Intell Syst 13:613–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan C, Song Y, Fu Q, Lei L, Wang X (2018a) New operators for aggregating intuitionistic fuzzy information with their application in decision making. IEEE Access 6(1):27214–27238

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan C, Song Y, Lei L, Wang X, Bai S (2018b) Evidence reasoning for temporal uncertain information based on relative reliability evaluation. Expert Syst Appl 113:264–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Florea MC, Jousselme A-L, Bosse E (2009) Robust combination rules for evidence theory. Inf Fus 10(2):183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Gau WL, Buehrer DJ (1993) Vague sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(2):610–614

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hong DH, Choi CH (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:103–113

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hong DH, Kim C (1999) A note on similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. Inf Sci 115:83–96

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li DF (2009) Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using IFS. Appl Soft Comput 9(1):219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DF (2011) The GOWA operator based approach to multiattribute decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Math Comput Model 53:1182–1196

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, He W (2013) Intuitionistic fuzzy PRI-AND and PRI-OR aggregation operators. Inf Fus 14:450–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P (2014) Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P (2018) Two-dimensional uncertain linguistic generalized normalized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean and its application to multiple-attribute decision making. Sci Iran 25(1):450–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Liu J (2018) Some q-Rung Orthopai fuzzy bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):315–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Tang G (2018) Some intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized interactive einstein choquet operators and their application in decision making. IEEE ACCESS 6:72357–72371

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HW, Wang GJ (2007) Multi-criteria decision making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur J Oper Res 179:220–233

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang P (2018a) Multiple-attribute decision making based on archimedean bonferroni operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(5):834–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang P (2018b) Some q-Rung Orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):259–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Zhang X (2018) Approach to multi-attributes decision making with intuitionistic linguistic information based on dempster-shafer evidence theory. IEEE ACCESS 6:52969–52981

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Chen SM, Wang P (2018) Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Publ Online. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2852948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memari A, Dargi A, Jokar MRA, Ahmad R, Rahim ARA (2019) Sustainable supplier selection: a multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Manuf Syst 50:9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara Y (1998) User oriented ranking criteria and its application to fuzzy mathematical programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94:275–276

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara Y, Sasaki M, Gen M (1992) On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients. Comput Ind Eng 23:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Y, Pedrycz W (2016) A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making. Eur J Oper Res 249:677–682

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P (2005) Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int J Approx Reason 38(2):133–147

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Wang X, Lei L, Xue A (2015) A novel similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its applications. Appl Intell 42:252–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Wang X, Zhu J, Lei L (2018) Sensor dynamic reliability evaluation based on evidence and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Intell 48:3950–3962

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Wang X, Quan W, Huang W (2019) A new approach to construct similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 23(6):1985–1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control Cybern. 31(4):1055–1057

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Ma B, Chen X (2009) Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operator based on fuzzy measure for multi-criteria group decision making. In: Proceedings of the 2009 sixth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, Tianjin, China, pp 545–549

  • Wang X, Song Y (2018) Uncertainty measure in evidence theory with its applications. Appl Intell 48(7):1672–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Xu J, Wang W (2009) Intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making based on projection method. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Chinese control and decision conference, Guilin, China, pp 17–19

  • Wei G (2010) Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 10(2):423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen L (2010) Intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supply chain information collaboration partner selection. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International conference of information science and management engineering, Xian, China, pp 43–46

  • Xia MM, Xu ZS, Zhu B (2012) Some issues on intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm. Knowl-Based Syst 31:78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2007a) Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 6(3):221–236

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2007b) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:1179–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2010) A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Group Decis Negot 19(1):57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2011) Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl-Based Syst 24(6):749–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Gen Syst 35:417–433

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yager RR (2008) Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 48(1):246–262

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8:123–139

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Chen Z (2012) The quasi-arithmetic intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operators. Knowl-Based Syst 27:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Wang YM, Xu DL, Chin KS (2006) The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 171(1):309–343

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Han D, Han C (2013) Discounted combination of unreliable evidence using degree of disagreement. Int J Approx Reason 54:1197–1216

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Z (2014) TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Inform Sci 277:141–153

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1986) A simple view of the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Mag 2:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Su W (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted distance operator. Knowl-Based Syst 24(8):1224–1232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Under Grant Nos. 61703426, 61273275, 61876189, 61806219 and 61503407, and supported by Young Talent Fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China, Under Grant No. 20190108.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Air and Missile Defense, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an, 710051, China

    Qiang Fu, Yafei Song, Cheng-li Fan, Lei Lei & Xiaodan Wang

Authors
  1. Qiang Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yafei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng-li Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lei Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaodan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yafei Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, Q., Song, Y., Fan, Cl. et al. Evidential model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Soft Comput 24, 7615–7635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04389-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04389-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation