Skip to main content
Log in

An approach based on combining Choquet integral and TOPSIS methods to uncertain MAGDM problems

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we considered the defined intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs) on real numbers and proposed a new method based on Hamacher operators to operate with membership and non-membership degrees of the given IFN in aggregation process. Also, a new method will be introduced to compute the distance between IFNs. These methods will be applied to solve multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, in which IFNs were used to model the arising uncertainty from human judgments or assessments. To do it, Choquet integral, as a powerful tool in both independent and interactive criteria, will be used individually or as a tool to provide appropriate conditions for application of TOPSIS method. The applicability of these methods is illustrated by numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashtiani B, Haghighirad F, Montazer GA (2009) Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 9:457–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1983) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Sgurev V (ed) VII ITKR’S Session Sofia Jone

  • Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin

  • Beg I, Rashid T (2014) Multi-criteria trapezoidal valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making with Choquet integral based TOPSIS. Opsearch 51(1):98–129

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boran FE, Genc S, Kurt M, Akay D (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with a TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 36:11363–11368

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Denoeux T (2014) Dempster-Shafer theory: Introduction. In: connections with rough sets and application to clustering, invited talk, 9th International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2014), Shanghai, China, October 24–26

  • Garg H (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators with entropy weight and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Iranian J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 43:597–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Agarwalb N, Tripathib A (2017) Some improved interactive aggregation operators under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment and their application to decision making process. Sci Iranica E 24(5):2581–2604

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P et al (2018) Multi-attribute group decision making based on extended TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 69:554–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomesa LFAM, Machadoa MAS (2013) Criteria interactions in multiple criteria decision aiding: a Choquet formulation for the TODIM method. Proc Comp Sci 17:324–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M, Labreuche C (2010) A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Ann Oper Res 175:247–286

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M, Roubens M (2000) Application of the Choquet integral in multicriteria decision making. In: Grabisch M, Murofushi T, Sugeno M (eds) Fuzzy measures and integrals: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Wurzburg, pp 415–434

  • Haishenga Z, Guohuab Q, Yongc Z, Zenglianga L, Chunhuab L, Xuxian Y (2018) A extended intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral correlation coefficient based on Shapley index in multi-criteria decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(2):2051–2062

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher H (1978) Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer Aussagen undderen Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione. In: Trappl R, Klir GJ (eds) Progress in Cybernetics and systems research, vol 3. Hemisphere, Washington DC, pp 276–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JY (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:505–513

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Wang Y (2014) Multi-attribute group decision making with unknown decision expert weights information in the framework of interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Math Prob Eng https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/635476

  • Kakati P, Borkotokey S (2020) Generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher generalized Shapley Choquet integral operators for multicriteria decision making. Iranian J Fuzzy Syst 17(1):121–139

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ke D, Song Y, Quan W (2018) New distance measure for atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision making. Symmetry 10:429. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keikha A, Nehi HM (2016) Operations and ranking methods for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers: a review and new methods. Int J Intell Syst Appl 1:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Klement E, Mesiar R, Pap E (2000) Triangular Norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty and information, foundations of generalized information theory. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 29(11):971–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Qin R, Gao CY, Wu XL, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera F (2019) Score-HeDLiSF: a score function of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based on hesitant degrees and linguistic scale functions: an application to unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic MULTIMOORA. Inf Fus 48:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2018) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the art survey. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(7):2084–2110

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigo JM (2015a) Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(4):1211–1227

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigo JM (2015b) Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl Based Syst 76:127–138

  • Liu F, Yuan XH (2007) Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy set. Fuzzy Syst Math 21:88–91

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li DF, Nan JX, Zhang MJ (2010) A ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to decision making. Int J Comput Intell Syst 3(5):522–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DF (2008) A note on using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly. Microelectron Reliabil 48:17–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao XB, Wu M, Dong J-Y et al (2019) A new method for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making: application to the selection of financial technologies. Appl Soft Comput J 77:155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Nan J, Zhang M (2014) Extensions of the TOPSIS for multiattribute decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. J Inf Comput Sci 11(5):1635–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayagam VLG, Muralikrishnan S, Sivaraman G (2011) Multi-criteria decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 38:1464–1467

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvathi R, Malathi C (2012) Arithmetic operations on symmetric trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int J Soft Comput Eng (IJSCE) 2(2):2231–2307

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak H (2003) Uncertain Science...Uncertain World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiang WJ, Zhong Z (2008) Programming method of multicriteria decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy number with incomplete certain information. Control Decis 23(10):1145–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP, Poovarasan V (2015) A robust MAGDM method for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Pure Appl Math 101(5):753–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseline SS, Amirtharaj ECH (2013) A new ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers with distance method based on the circumcenter of centroids. Int J Appl Math Statist Sci (IJAMSS) 2(4):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury S, Wang BH (1998) On generalized Hamacher families of triangular operators. Int J Approx Reason 19:419–439

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M (1993) Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization. Plenum Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Son MJ, Park JH, Ko KH (2019) Some hesitant fuzzy hamacher power-aggregation operators for multiple attribute decision making. Mathematics 7:594. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7070594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1997) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:505–518

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson M (1989) Ignorance and Uncertainty: emerging paradigms. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Yi W, Chen X (2015) Hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multicriteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 26:325–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Huang JJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making methods and application. CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos KI, Sergiadis GD (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy information-applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 28:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S-P, Xu J (2017) A method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers application to trustworthy service selection. Sci Iranica E 24(2):794–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ, Nie R, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2013) New operators on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their applications in system fault analysis. Inf Sci 251:79–95

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yang R, Leung KS (2010) Nonlinear Integrals and Their Application in Data Mining. Adv Fuzzy Syst—Appl Theory https://doi.org/10.1142/6861

  • Wang WZ, Liu XW (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. Int J Intell Syst 26:1049–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ, Zhang Z (2008) Programming method of multicriteria decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy number with incomplete certain information. Control Decis 23(10):1145–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Wan S (2020) Possibility degree and divergence degree based method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Expert Syst Appl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112929

  • Wang JQ, Zhang Z (2009) Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. J Syst Eng Electron 20(2):321–326

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Mendel J (2019) Multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic variables and complete unknown weight information. Iranian J Fuzzy Syst 16(4):145–157

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Leung KS, Wong ML, Fang J, Xu K (2000) Nonlinear nonnegative multi-regressions based on Choquet integrals. Int J Approx Reason 25:71–87

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Xin X (2005) Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 26:2063–2069

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei CP (2011) A new method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int J Knowl Syst Sci 2(1):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu XL, Liao HC (2019) A consensus based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance sore method. Euro J Oper Res 272(3):1017–1027

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Wang Z, Heng PA, Leung K (2005) Fuzzy numbers and fuzzification of the Choquet integral. Fuzzy Sets Syst 153:95–113

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Klir GL (2016) Several new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher hybrid operators and their application to multi-criteria group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 18:5

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MJ, Nan JX (2013) A compromise ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems. Iranian J Fuzzy Syst 10(6):21–37

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Chang W (2014) Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the Hamacher operation with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application. Jf Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:1087–1094

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran (No. ...). We thank our colleagues from Velayat University who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research, although they may not agree with all of the interpretations/conclusions of this paper. We would also like to show our gratitude to the Editors for sharing their pearls of wisdom with us, to anonymous Reviewers for their comments on the manuscript, although any errors are our own and should not tarnish the reputations of these esteemed persons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abazar Keikha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keikha, A., Garg, H. & Mishmast Nehi, H. An approach based on combining Choquet integral and TOPSIS methods to uncertain MAGDM problems. Soft Comput 25, 7181–7195 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05682-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05682-9

Keywords

Navigation