Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public transport customer satisfaction evaluation using an extended thermodynamic method: a case study of Shanghai, China

  • Application of soft computing
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public transport plays an essential role in helping people escape from the congested traffic in large and crowded cities. Evaluating customer satisfaction is the key to the continuous quality improvement of public transport services. This work proposes a new public transport customer satisfaction evaluation approach based on an extended thermodynamic method with q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. First, we use the q-ROFSs to handle the ambiguity and uncertainty of customer satisfaction evaluation information for public transport. Then, we extend the thermodynamic method to determine the customer satisfaction levels of public transport lines. Moreover, the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis method is utilized to specify the weights of evaluation criteria as it is simple and time-saving. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is illustrated with a customer satisfaction evaluation of the rail transit network in Shanghai, China. Results showed that Line 7 has the highest customer satisfaction and Line 2 has the lowest customer satisfaction among the considered rail transit lines. Besides, nine evaluation criteria need to be optimized to improve the customer satisfaction level of Line 2 and the most critical one is train crowding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen J, Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G, Ortúzar JDD (2019) The role of critical incidents and involvement in transit satisfaction and loyalty. Transp Policy 75:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen J, Eboli L, Mazzulla G, Ortúzar JD (2020) Effect of critical incidents on public transport satisfaction and loyalty: An ordinal probit SEM-MIMIC approach. Transportation 47(2):827–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin N, Celik E, Gumus AT (2015) A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 77:61–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Balali A, Hakimelahi A, Valipour A (2020) Identification and prioritization of passive energy consumption optimization measures in the building industry: An Iranian case study. J Build Eng 30:101239

    Google Scholar 

  • Balki MK, Erdoğan S, Aydın S, Sayin C (2020) The optimization of engine operating parameters via SWARA and ARAS hybrid method in a small SI engine using alternative fuels. J Clean Prod 258:120685

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilişik ÖN, Şeker Ş, Aydın N, Güngör N, Baraçlı H (2018) Passenger satisfaction evaluation of public transportation in Istanbul by using fuzzy quality function deployment methodology. Arab J Sci Eng 44(3):2811–2824

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelebi D, İmre Ş (2020) Measuring crowding-related comfort in public transport. Transp Plan Technol 43(7):735–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Darko AP, Liang D (2020) Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103259

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oña J (2020) The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 142:296–318

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oña J (2021) Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: a cross-country analysis. Transp Policy 100:129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • de Aquino JT, de Melo FJC, Jerônimo TB, de Medeiros DD (2019) Evaluation of quality in public transport services: the use of quality dimensions as an input for fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(1):176–193

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oña R, de Abreu e Silva J, Muñoz-Monge C, de Oña J (2018) Users’ satisfaction evolution of a metropolitan transit system in a context of economic downturn. Int J Sustain Transp 12(1):66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Du WS (2018) Minkowski-type distance measures for generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 33(4):802–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan CY, Liu HC, Zhang LJ, Shi H (2019) An extended alternative queuing method with linguistic Z-numbers and its application for green supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(8):2510–2523

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon M, Marquet O, Gràcia-Lavedan E, Ambròs A, Götschi T, Nazelle AD, Panis LI, Gerike R, Brand C, Dons E, Eriksson U, Iacorossi F, Ávila-Palència I, Cole-Hunter T, Nieuwenhuisjen MJ (2020) What explains public transport use? Evidence from seven European cities. Transp Policy 99:362–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong JW, Li Q, Yin L, Liu HC (2020) Undergraduate teaching audit and evaluation using an extended MABAC method under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Int J Intell Syst 35(12):1912–1933

    Google Scholar 

  • Güner S (2018) Measuring the quality of public transportation systems and ranking the bus transit routes using multi-criteria decision making techniques. Case Stud Transp Policy 6(2):214–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren J (2020) The effect of public transport quality on car ownership—A source of wider benefits? Res Transp Econ 83:100957

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrelja R, Khan J, Pettersson F (2020) How to create efficient public transport systems? A systematic review of critical problems and approaches for addressing the problems. Transp Policy 98:186–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Keršulienė V, Zavadskas E, Turskis Z (2010) Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J Bus Econ Manag 11(2):243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MJ, Ali MI, Kumam P (2021) A new ranking technique for q-rung orthopair fuzzy values. Int J Intell Syst 36(1):558–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiani Mavi R, Zarbakhshnia N, Khazraei A (2018) Bus rapid transit (BRT): a simulation and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. Transp Policy 72:187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishankumar R, Gowtham Y, Ahmed I, Ravichandran KS, Kar S (2020) Solving green supplier selection problem using q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based decision framework with unknown weight information. Appl Soft Comput 94:106431

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu Gündoğdu F, Duleba S, Moslem S, Aydın S (2021) Evaluating public transport service quality using picture fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and linear assignment model. Appl Soft Comput 100:106920

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X-H, Huang L, Li Q, Liu H-C (2020) Passenger satisfaction evaluation of public transportation using Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method under large group environment. Sustainability 12(12):4996

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Wu D, Huang Y, Ren P, Xu Z, Verma M (2018) Green logistic provider selection with a hesitant fuzzy linguistic thermodynamic method integrating cumulative prospect theory and PROMETHEE. Sustainability 10(4):1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Zhang H, Zhang C, Wu X, Mardani A, Al-Barakati A (2020) A q-rung orthopair fuzzy GLDS method for investment evaluation of be angel capital in China. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(1):103–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJH, Hsu CC, Chen YS (2014) Improving transportation service quality based on information fusion. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 67:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang P (2018) Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):259–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang Y (2020) Multiple attribute decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetic mean operators. Inf Sci 518:181–210

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang Y, Xu M, Xu G (2019) Emergency alternative evaluation using extended trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy thermodynamic approach with prospect theory. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(6):1801–1817

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Chen SM, Wang P (2020) Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 50(10):3741–3756

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeini MA, Zandieh M, Najafi SE, Sajadi SM (2020) Analyzing the development of the third-generation biodiesel production from microalgae by a novel hybrid decision-making method: the case of Iran. Energy 195:116895

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassereddine M, Eskandari H (2017) An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 106:427–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni A, Zhang C, Hu Y, Lu W, Li H (2020) Influence mechanism of the corporate image on passenger satisfaction with public transport in China. Transp Policy 94:54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Huang H (2020) Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with CRITIC for financial risk evaluation. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26:695–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Quddus M, Rahman F, Monsuur F, de Ona J, Enoch M (2019) Analyzing bus passengers’ satisfaction in Dhaka using discrete choice models. Transp Res Rec 2673:758–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani P, Mishra AR (2020) Multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for fuel technology selection using q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Sustain Prod Consum 24:90–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren P, Xu Z, Hao Z (2017a) Hesitant fuzzy thermodynamic method for emergency decision making based on prospect theory. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2531–2543

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren P, Xu Z, Liao H, Zeng XJ (2017b) A thermodynamic method of intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM to assist the hierarchical medical system in China. Inf Sci 420:490–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltanpour A, Mesbah M, Habibian M (2020) Customer satisfaction in urban rail: A study on transferability of structural equation models. Public Trans 12(1):123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Soza-Parra J, Raveau S, Muñoz JC, Cats O (2019) The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 126:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahanisaz S, shokuhyar S (2020) Evaluation of passenger satisfaction with service quality: A consecutive method applied to the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management 83

  • Verma M, Rajasankar J (2017) A thermodynamical approach towards group multi-criteria decision making (GMCDM) and its application to human resource selection. Appl Soft Comput 52:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente P, Suleman A, Reis E (2020) Index of satisfaction with public transport: A fuzzy clustering approach. Sustainability 12(22):9759

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhang Z, Sun H (2018) Assessing customer satisfaction of urban rail transit network in Tianjin based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision model. Discret Dyn Nat Soc 2018:4205136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wei G, Lu J, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Wei C, Zhang Y (2019) Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision-making and their application to enterprise resource planning systems selection. Int J Intell Syst 34(10):2429–2458

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Liang D, Xu Z, Ye D (2020) The evaluation of mobile health apps: A psychological perception-based probabilistic linguistic belief thermodynamic multiple attribute decision making method. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1801361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Gao H, Wei Y (2018) Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(7):1426–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2017) Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(5):1222–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Yücenur GN, Çaylak GG, Postalcıoğlu M (2020) An integrated solution with SWARA& COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility. Renew Energy 145:2587–2597

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu Y, Lu W, Xiao G (2019) Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: Evidence from Chinese public transport service. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 120:149–164

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the respected editor and the anonymous referees for their insightful and constructive comments, which helped to improve the overall quality of this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61773250), the major project of the National Social Science Foundation of China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Chen, QY., Liu, Z. et al. Public transport customer satisfaction evaluation using an extended thermodynamic method: a case study of Shanghai, China. Soft Comput 25, 10901–10914 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05790-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05790-6

Keywords

Navigation