Skip to main content
Log in

On a variety of hemi-implicative semilattices

  • Foundations
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hemi-implicative semilattice is an algebra \((A,\wedge ,\rightarrow ,1)\) of type (2, 2, 0) such that \((A,\wedge ,1)\) is a bounded semilattice and the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. 1.

    for every \(a,b,c\in A\), if \(a\le b\rightarrow c\) then \(a\wedge b\le c\) and

  2. 2.

    for every \(a\in A\), \(a\rightarrow a = 1\).

The class of hemi-implicative semilattices forms a variety. In this paper we introduce and study a proper subvariety of the variety of hemi-implicative semilattices, \(\mathsf {ShIS}\), which also properly contains some varieties of interest for algebraic logic. Our main goal is to show a representation theorem for \(\mathsf {ShIS}\). More precisely, we prove that every algebra of \(\mathsf {ShIS}\) is isomorphic to a subalgebra of a member of \(\mathsf {ShIS}\) whose underlying bounded semilattice is the bounded semilattice of upsets of a poset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Let \((A,\le )\) be a poset. If any two elements \(a, b \in A\) have a greatest lower bound (i.e., an infimum), which is denoted by \(a\wedge b\), then the algebra \((A,\wedge )\) is called a meet semilattice. Throughout this article we write semilattice in place of meet semilattice. A semilattice \((A,\wedge )\) is said to be bounded if it has a greatest element; in this case we write \((A,\wedge ,1)\), where 1 is the greatest element of \((A,\le )\).

  2. Hemi-implicative lattices were originally introduced in [13] under the name of weak implicative lattices.

  3. It is interesting to note that \(\mathsf {RWH}\cap \mathsf {Hil}^{l}= \mathsf {Hey}\), where \(\mathsf {Hey}\) is the variety of Heyting algebras. Indeed, it is immediate that \(\mathsf {Hey}\subseteq \mathsf {RWH}\cap \mathsf {Hil}^{l}\). Conversely, let \(A\in \mathsf {RWH}\cap \mathsf {Hil}^{l}\) and \(a\in A\). Since \(1\rightarrow a = a\) then it follows from [5, Proposition 4.20] and [5, Proposition 4.22] that \(A\in \mathsf {Hey}\). Therefore, \(\mathsf {RWH}\cap \mathsf {Hil}^{l}= \mathsf {Hey}\).

References

  1. Balbes R, Dwinger P (1974) Distributive lattices. University of Missouri Press

  2. Bezhanishvili N, Gehrke M (2011) Finitely generated free Heyting algebras via Birkhoff duality and coalgebra. Logical Methods Comput Sci 7:1–24

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Castiglioni JL, San Martín HJ (2018) l-Hemi-Implicative Semilattices. Studia Logica 106:675–690

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Celani SA, Esteban M (2017) Spectral-like duality for distributive Hilbert algebras with infimum. Algebra Universalis 78:193–213

  5. Celani SA, Jansana R (2005) Bounded distributive lattices with strict implication. Math Logic Q 51(3):219–246

  6. Cirulis J (2011) Weak relative pseudocomplements in semilattices. Demostratio Mathematica 44(4):651–672

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Diego A (1965) Sobre Algebras de Hilbert. Notas de Lógica Matemática. Instituto de Matemática, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca

  8. Epstein G, Horn A (1976) Logics which are characterized by subresiduated lattices. Z Math Logik Grundlagen Math 22:199–210

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Figallo AV, Ramón G, Saad S (2003) A note on the Hilbert algebras with infimum. Math Contemp 24:23–37

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nemitz W (1965) Implicative semi-lattices. Trans Am Math Soc 117:128–142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sankappanavar HP (2007) Semi-Heyting algebras: an abstraction from Heyting algebras. Actas del IX Congreso Dr. Antonio A. R. Monteiro, Bahía Blanca

  12. Sankappanavar HP (2011) Expansions of semi-heyting algebras I: discriminator varieties. Studia Logica 98:27–81

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. San Martín HJ (2017) On congruences in weak implicative semi-lattices. Soft Comput 21(12):3167–3176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET-Argentina), Universidad Nacional de La Plata [PPID/X047] and a subvention of Cicitca (Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Argentina).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernán Javier San Martín.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All the authors have equally contributed in the making of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castiglioni, J.L., Fernández, V., Mallea, H.F. et al. On a variety of hemi-implicative semilattices. Soft Comput 26, 3187–3195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06807-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06807-4

Keywords

Navigation