Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multilateral remedial actions and the proposal for the cost sharing among European transmission system operators (TSOs): lessons learnt from 25.03.2013 (case study)

  • CIGRE 2014
  • Published:
e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most important task for the European transmission system network operations (TSOs) is to ensure the grid security and the non-interruptible electricity supply avoiding blackouts and, at the same time, enabling the electricity trading in the Internal European Electricity Market (IEEM). In framework of TSO Security Cooperation (TSC), whose aim is to enhance the coordination among the participating TSOs, the cost-sharing principle as well as the ex-post concept of remedial actions activation analysis is to be developed. Due to the different reasons it could happen that remedial actions (such as cross-border redispatch and countertrading) are identified as necessary during the different timeframes: from capacity calculation, over the operational planning phase to close-to-real-time operation. Those measures are used for the different purposes, e.g. for guarantying physical firmness of scheduled energy transactions, maintaining the predefined voltage level and/or ensuring system security.

This paper aims to analyse the possible causes of redispatch deployment and to introduce fair cost sharing principles among TSOs for the activation of multilateral remedial actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Notes

  1. Measure between non-neighbouring TSOs whose costs are currently paid based on “requester-pays” methodology.

  2. Activation of redispatch measures when energy flows originating in Germany exceed a predetermined threshold. 50 Hertz paid the costs incurred for the application of this method in the pilot phase.

  3. It should be noted that Cause 1 is completely included in the overloaded part of the line and Cause 2 only partially (with 3 MW as a difference between line loading in IDCF and PATL).

  4. In such case only Cause 2 would be considered and costs sharing would be as follows: 50 Hertz (48.5 %), MAVIR (25.5 %), APG (18.4 %), HEP-OPS (4.2 %), Tennet DE (2.6 %), other TSC TSOs (0.8 %).

References

  1. Vukasovic, M., Apostolovic, M. (2009): A line-wise method for the allocation of physical transmission rights and its influence on physical and financial firmness. In 6th international conference on the European electricity market, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  2. UCTE (2009): UCTE operational handbook, Appendix 3: Operational security. Final version (approved by SC on 19 March 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. BNetzA, URE (2013): Short term approaches to tackle loop flows 50 Hz-PSE Agreement. In 2nd ACER workshop on loop flows, June 2013, Slovenia. A joint presentation of BNetzA und URE

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan Vukasovic.

Additional information

Paper submitted for the CIGRE Session 2014, SC C5, Paris, France, August 24–29, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vukasovic, M., Vujasinovic, Z. Multilateral remedial actions and the proposal for the cost sharing among European transmission system operators (TSOs): lessons learnt from 25.03.2013 (case study). Elektrotech. Inftech. 131, 366–371 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-014-0235-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-014-0235-8

Keywords

Navigation