Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric identification of robotic systems with stable time-varying Hopfield networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a novel method for on-line identification of non-linear systems is proposed based upon the optimisation methodology with Hopfield neural networks. The original Hopfield model is adapted so that the weights of the resulting network are time-varying. A rigorous analytical study proves that, under mild assumptions, the estimations provided by the method converge to the actual parameter values in the case of constant parameters, or to a bounded neighbourhood of the parameters when these are time-varying. Time-varying parameters, often appearing in mechanical systems, are dealt with by the neural estimator in a more natural way than by least squares techniques. Both sudden and slow continuous variations are considered. Besides, in contrast to the gradient method, the neural estimator does not critically depend on the adjustment of the gain. The proposed method is applied to the identification of a robotic system with a flexible link. A reduced output prediction error and an accurate estimation of parameters are observed in simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ODE :

Ordinary differential equation

LIP :

Linear in the parameters (system)

References

  1. Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Slotine J-J, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control. Prentice Hall, London

  3. Unbehauen H (1996) Some new trends in identification and modeling of nonlinear dynamical systems. Appl Math Comput 78:279–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Spong MW, Vidyasagar M (1989) Robot dynamics and control. Wiley, New York

  5. Sastry S, Bodson M (1989) Adaptive control: stability, convergence, and robustness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marino R (1997) Adaptive control of nonlinear systems: basic results and applications. Annu Rev Contr 21:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Narendra KS, Parthasarathy K (1990) Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE T Neural Netw 1:4–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poznyak AS, Sanchez E, Yu W (2001) Differential neural networks for robust nonlinear control. World Scientific Publishing, New Jersey

  9. Atencia M, Joya G, Sandoval F (2003) Modelling the HIV-AIDS Cuban epidemics with Hopfield neural networks. In: Mira J et al (eds) Artificial neural nets. Problem solving methods. Lecture notes on computer science, vol 2687. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 449–456

  10. Hrycej T (1997) Neurocontrol: towards an industrial control technology. Wiley, New York

  11. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3088–3092

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tank D, Hopfield JJ (1985) Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol Cybern 52:141–152

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith KA (1999) Neural networks for combinatorial optimization: a review of more than a decade of research. INFORMS J Comput 11(1):15–34

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Abe S (1989) Theories on the Hopfield neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’89), Washington, DC, June 1989 1:557–564

  15. Joya G, Atencia M, Sandoval F (2002) Hopfield neural networks for optimization: study of the different dynamics. Neurocomputing 43(1–4):219–237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khalil HK (2002) Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

  17. Horn RA, Johnson CR (1985) Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  18. Atencia M (2004) Stability in neural systems with feedback. Application to control (in Spanish). Univesidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benosman M, Boyer F, Le Vey G, Primault D (2002) Flexible link manipulators: from modeling to control. J Intell Robot Syst 34(4):357–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atencia M, Joya G, Sandoval F (2004) Gray box identification with Hopfield neural networks. Rev Invest Operac (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by project no. TIC2001-1758, funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (MCYT) and FEDER funds. The comments of the anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Atencia.

Additional information

This is a considerably extended version of a paper presented at the conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (EANN), held in September 2003 at Málaga, Spain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atencia, M., Joya, G. & Sandoval, F. Parametric identification of robotic systems with stable time-varying Hopfield networks. Neural Comput & Applic 13, 270–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0421-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0421-4

Keywords

Navigation